HoC Kinsey Scale
TSR's model parliament.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning | 16-05-2013 | |
-
View Poll Results: Where do you stand?
0-Exclusively heterosexual 18 33.96% 1-Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexua 11 20.75% 2-Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual 9 16.98% 3-Equally heterosexual and homosexual. 3 5.66% 4-Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual 4 7.55% 5-Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual 3 5.66% 6-Exclusively homosexual 4 7.55% X-Asexual, Non-Sexual 1 1.89%
-
HoC Kinsey Scale
So, due to a discussion in the bar I thought I would be nosey and ask everyone, out of interest, where they feel they sit on the Kinsey Scale.
Maybe we can find a HOC average and see collectively homosexual, or not, we are
Here are the descriptions:
Rating Description
0 Exclusively heterosexual
1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual.
4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6 Exclusively homosexual
X Asexual, Non-Sexual
Have fun
-
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleDo you ever look at a guy and think phwoar?(Original post by CyclopsRock)
I'm as straight as a massive, throbbing, gay cock.
No, but really, I don't even understand the difference between 1 and 5, so I assume that makes me 0. -
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleI can appreciate a good looking guy, but in no less a platonic way than I can appreciate a good steak or a cute dog.(Original post by MacCuishy)
Do you ever look at a guy and think phwoar? -
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleProbably a 0 then. Maybe a 1, depends how much you appreciate them(Original post by CyclopsRock)
I can appreciate a good looking guy, but in no less a platonic way than I can appreciate a good steak or a cute dog.
-
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleHmmm(Original post by CyclopsRock)
I can appreciate a good looking guy, but in no less a platonic way than I can appreciate a good steak or a cute dog. -
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleYeah we did - I came across it browsing the MHoC.(Original post by TheCrackInTime)
2 - Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual (I'd say around 60/40)
I'm pretty sure we had one of these last year, so it'll be interesting to see how the new intake of MPs affects the overall results. -
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleI'm not sure about you being Alpha Male....(Original post by internetguru)
I have no interest in men so I guess this would make me a 0. Alpha male phwaaaaaaaaaa. -
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleMy MHoC history speaks for itself.(Original post by MacCuishy)
I'm not sure about you being Alpha Male....
- Submitting bills without talking to party first (Alpha Male leading the way)
- Submitting bills to rename the country no one else would be brave enough to submit (Fearless alpha male)
- Taking on other alpha males like tehFrance in irrelevant arguments (Alpha males never back down) -
Re: HoC Kinsey Scale(Original post by internetguru)
My MHoC history speaks for itself.
- Submitting bills without talking to party first (Alpha Male leading the way)
- Submitting bills to rename the country no one else would be brave enough to submit (Fearless alpha male)
- Taking on other alpha males like tehFrance in irrelevant arguments (Alpha males never back down)
I think you'll find tehFrance isn't exclusively heterosexual as you think he is.
But I do note the sarcasm, or I hope it is anyway
-
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleIs that what constitutes incidental homosexuality?(Original post by MacCuishy)
Do you ever look at a guy and think phwoar?
Some of you, gentlemen, seem to miss the biological nature of sexual attraction. Regardless of my opinion on sexual deviations – I am not going into those waters again – there is a qualitative difference between aesthetic appreciation of people of the same gender and homosexuality per se which you ought to bear in mind. Finally, I am indeed surprised that amongst 16 persons, only 1 out of 3 sees himself as heterosexual which is rather contradictory to statistics (yes, the sample is too limited).
-
Re: HoC Kinsey ScaleTrust me, I have been incidentally homosexual(Original post by Life_peer)
Is that what constitutes incidental homosexuality?
Some of you, gentlemen, seem to miss the biological nature of sexual attraction. Regardless of my opinion on sexual deviations – I am not going into those waters again – there is a qualitative difference between aesthetic appreciation of people of the same gender and homosexuality per se which you ought to bear in mind. Finally, I am indeed surprised that amongst 16 persons, only 1 out of 3 sees himself as heterosexual which is rather contradictory to statistics (yes, the sample is too limited).