The Male 'Fashion' Thread III

Want to know whether you should buy that dress, show off your new handbag or just discuss your favourite designers? This is the forum for you.

Announcements Posted on
Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera 21-05-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. rockrunride's Avatar
    • Section Moderator
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: North Four
    • Posts: 13,748
    The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    The third instalment of the now-thriving anguish at compromising manliness for looking darn good.

    The former thread can be found here.

    So

    (Original post by Marshyy)
    x
    and

    (Original post by py0alb)
    x
    Brands, yay or nay?
  2. kuks's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Location: Warwickshire
    • Posts: 5,686
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    Subbed.
  3. py0alb's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Location: the UK
    • Posts: 17,783
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    (Original post by rockrunride)
    The third instalment of the now-thriving anguish at compromising manliness for looking darn good.

    The former thread can be found here.

    So

    and

    Brands, yay or nay?
    Having an idea of a few different manufacturers that, in your experience, make good quality/value items, yay.

    Buying an item specifically because it is a certain cache brand with the intention of deriving social status from that association, nay.
  4. rockrunride's Avatar
    • Section Moderator
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: North Four
    • Posts: 13,748
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    (Original post by py0alb)
    Having an idea of a few different manufacturers that, in your experience, make good quality/value items, yay.

    Buying an item specifically because it is a certain cache brand with the intention of deriving social status from that association, nay.
    I think to an extent everyone buys stuff because of the name. For example Abercrombie make well-made clothes but are also a massive name; in fact they have become so big that it's impossible to buy anything from there without carrying the flashy stigma. Would there therefore exist, in your eyes, some brands that are nayworthy despite a reputation of producing quality goods?
  5. tehforum's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: England
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    awww yeah

    subbed
  6. py0alb's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Location: the UK
    • Posts: 17,783
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    (Original post by rockrunride)
    I think to an extent everyone buys stuff because of the name. For example Abercrombie make well-made clothes but are also a massive name; in fact they have become so big that it's impossible to buy anything from there without carrying the flashy stigma. Would there therefore exist, in your eyes, some brands that are nayworthy despite a reputation of producing quality goods?

    I will speak in general terms. When you buy an item of clothing (or indeed any commercial product), you pay £x for the product itself and a further £y for what marketing strategists call the "added value", that is the social and psychological kudos attached to that particular brand.

    Personally, I am only interested in paying for the product itself. I'm not interested in attempting to gain kudos amongst my peers by association with certain clothes retailers or manufacturers. Therefore I would prefer y to be as small as possible, preferably 0.

    The more fashionable the brand, the higher y will be. Hence the less likely I am to buy it. Not out of some kind of snobbery, but simply for that fact that fashionable or designer brands are a poor investment decision if you're just looking for the highest possible intrinsic quality/price ratio.
  7. Jingers's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: Birmingham/London
    • Posts: 8,237
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    If you're buying items purely based off of the name and you're just following trends then <<<<<
  8. SamF1992's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 635
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    Subbed.

    In regards to the brands thing. I do take notice of which brands I'm buying, not because I like to show off what brand I'm wearing, but because I know which brands fit me well and fit into my overall look. So I tend to look for Fred Perry polos, Brooks Brothers and Brutus shirts and so on.
  9. dudeydan's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 136
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    Subbed
    Also what do people think about this jacket:
    http://www.brandalley.co.uk/FSRayon/...9-Rayon-805045
    You'll probably need to be registered to see it.

    Cheers
  10. paddy's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: LonDonCheadle
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    About time we got to a 3rd thread :congrats:

    (Original post by cgvince)
    Opinions on this, was only £25 but im not completely sold on it,

    Attachment 152359
    I think I have it in red.

    It's a nice shirt, I'd have gotten the blue as well but I can't buy everythingi like otherwise I'd be broke.

    It's a lot more versatile in blue as well, should be pretty easy to wear (although I'd unroll the sleeves do there was no white showing, looks a bit cheap).

    (Original post by dudeydan)
    Subbed
    Also what do people think about this jacket:
    http://www.brandalley.co.uk/FSRayon/...9-Rayon-805045
    You'll probably need to be registered to see it.

    Cheers
    Nice enough, can't go wrong really.
  11. BSc.Pro.Logic's Avatar
    • Respected Member
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 214
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    Subbed :ahee:
  12. paddy's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: LonDonCheadle
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    When it comes to brands I think it's only natural that people are influenced by them, there's a reason brand management is a big deal in marketing. I wouldn't actively seek obviously branded stuff though, I do think that things like the comically large RL polo player and the Louis Vuitton signature monogram are pretty tacky, especially because you can't go anywhere in central London without seeing them.

    Personally I like to keep impartial, meaning even though I hate Topman I'll still have a look every now and then to see if their current collection is different. I mean I've thought River Island was a lot of Topman-like crap for a few years now but I really like a lot of the stuff they've got now.
  13. Tom_Sg's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: Somewhere
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    :cool:
  14. py0alb's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Location: the UK
    • Posts: 17,783
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    I think in many ways brands are a substitute for a sense of style. If you don't know enough about clothes to be able to judge what looks good for yourself, then perhaps the safe option is simply to buy something that is fashionable and/or visibly branded, because even though you look the same as everyone else, at least you won't be singled out for mockery. Its a route most teenagers take if we're honest.
  15. Tom_Sg's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: Somewhere
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    (Original post by py0alb)
    I think in many ways brands are a substitute for a sense of style. If you don't know enough about clothes to be able to judge what looks good for yourself, then perhaps the safe option is simply to buy something that is fashionable and/or visibly branded, because even though you look the same as everyone else, at least you won't be singled out for mockery. Its a route most teenagers take if we're honest.
    I had the same argument on a french forum.
  16. gimboid's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 121
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    opinions on these, got em for about £40 with voucher codes and a gift certificate i had:

  17. py0alb's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Location: the UK
    • Posts: 17,783
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    I hate those stupid square leather laces, they just constantly keep untying themselves. When I had a pair I just cut em off, tucked em in, and wore them as slip ons.

    I like mocassins in general, they're just a little cliched right now, having been rebranded as "boat shoes".
  18. rockrunride's Avatar
    • Section Moderator
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: North Four
    • Posts: 13,748
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    (Original post by gimboid)
    opinions on these, got em for about £40 with voucher codes and a gift certificate i had:

    Noice. I want a new pair of deckies. Scrimping on a Burton's pair didn't really work, and they've become my fall back pair for grubby nights out where they'll accumulate all types of vomit, piss, mud and alcohol. Would like to go for the real deal, eg a pair of Sperry or Sebago shoes. But to pay for the brand? Haha.
  19. Hectorious's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 433
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    Looks good to me (y)
  20. Tom_Sg's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: Somewhere
    Re: The Male 'Fashion' Thread III
    (Original post by py0alb)
    I hate those stupid square leather laces, they just constantly keep untying themselves. When I had a pair I just cut em off, tucked em in, and wore them as slip ons.

    I like mocassins in general, they're just a little cliched right now, having been rebranded as "boat shoes".
    I prefer mocassin .... I have worked for the brand Bobbies as a salesman. I ... recommend them !

    www.bobbies.fr

    :love:
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Useful resources
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.