Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?

Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. jackie11's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Location: Suffolk (moving to London sep 2013)
    • Posts: 574
    Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    Hi there

    Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
  2. JeremyB's Avatar
    • Junior Member
    • Posts: 28
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    Yes, it is x\ln x - x.

    You can find it using integration by parts.
  3. Hasufel's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 989
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    Yup. choose, as JB says, parts, using Ln(x) = Ln(x) x (1) - derive the Log part, integrate 1 for the other
  4. EEngWillow's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: Crawley
    • Posts: 3,032
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    How do you figuratively integrate a function? :confused:
  5. bahjat93's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 1,032
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    (Original post by jackie11)
    Hi there

    Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    I'm gonna take a guess and say you've got a C3 exam 2morrow.
    You should avoid integrating Ln X, that's why in integration by parts you make u=Ln x no matter what that way you only have to differentiate it and not integrate it.
    This method works because i tried it with a question and came out with the right answer.
  6. raheem94's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 5,512
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    Here is an example from my book:

  7. Hasufel's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 989
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    (Original post by EEngWillow)
    How do you figuratively integrate a function? :confused:
    Eh?

    NO!
    Last edited by Hasufel; 30-05-2012 at 19:42.
  8. levantine's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Location: Manchester
    • Posts: 534
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    (Original post by Hasufel)
    Eh?

    NO!
    well your question said "literally" and dont really know what you mean by using that word in this context?
  9. JonathanM's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 100
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    xln(x) - x + c
  10. tommm's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    It could be a misspelling of "illiterately".
  11. tommm's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    Re: Is there such a thing a literaly integrating ln x?
    On a more serious note - the posters who gave the answer are correct, but you should try it yourself. Integrate by parts, using the trick u = \ln x, \frac{dv}{dx} = 1. It may seem weird, but it works.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.