Step ii 2007 q6
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Step ii 2007 q6
I'm not sure if math questions for STEP are meant to be posted in separate posts. So I apologise if I haven't gotten it right. Feel free to merge this post.
Actual question:
.
.
I'm asking about chewwy's solution to Q6 in STEP II 2007:
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/atta...4&d=1183161671


First Question --- How would you see this trick --- to add
to the desired integral?
I know the question asks us to differentiate the functions but I still don't see this trick.
Then use
to get


Second Question --- I know how to integrate
by using the substitution
. But the STEP solution says that no calculus work is needed for this part --- the integration of
. I don't see the derivatives in the first part help me to get
?
Thanks a lot---Last edited by adrienne_om; 04-06-2012 at 19:12. -
Re: Step ii 2007 q6He seems to have used a less simplified form of the derivative of(Original post by adrienne_om)
I'm not sure if math questions for STEP are meant to be posted in separate posts. So I apologise if I haven't gotten it right. Feel free to merge this post.
Actual question:
.
.
I'm asking about chewwy's solution to Q6 in STEP II 2007:
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/atta...4&d=1183161671


First Question --- How would you see this trick --- to add
to the desired integral?
I know the question asks us to differentiate the functions but I still don't see this trick.
Then use
to get

. Namely, by the product rule,
. As soon as he saw that, it's obvious that he'll be able to evaluate an integral similar to that so he went for the addition-subtraction trick.
He then noted a different form of the above derivative:
(1)
and also:
(2)
Furthermore:
![= \dfrac{1}{2}\left(\dfrac{d}{dx}[x\sqrt{3+x^2}] -3\dfrac{d}{dx}[\ln(x+\sqrt{3+x^2})]\right) = \dfrac{1}{2}\left(\dfrac{d}{dx}[x\sqrt{3+x^2}] -3\dfrac{d}{dx}[\ln(x+\sqrt{3+x^2})]\right)](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/d4/d4d56683201bb052fcd10f6be47da2f8.png)
by (1) and (2), which is easy to integrate. He made a mistake in the last line of working - There's a small sign error.
I have to say, I think this is the long way of doing it. When I did the question, I noted that:


Using (2), the RHS is easy to integrate and you're done.Last edited by Farhan.Hanif93; 01-06-2012 at 21:13. Reason: LaTeX being buggy. -
Re: Step ii 2007 q6actually, one last question ---(Original post by Farhan.Hanif93)
I have to say, I think this is the long way of doing it. When I did the question, I noted that:


Using (2), the RHS is easy to integrate and you're done.
How did you see the above? It wasn't and is still not obvious to me. The only way I see it is ---

and it looks like only to be a very clever algebra trick ---
Thanks again ---Last edited by adrienne_om; 04-06-2012 at 19:11. -
Re: Step ii 2007 q6I think you've made a small typo at the start; it should be(Original post by adrienne_om)
actually, one last question ---
How did you see the above? It wasn't and is still not obvious to me. The only way I see it is ---

and it looks like only to be a very clever algebra trick ---
Thanks again ---
. My reasoning behind it was that I wanted to rewrite this derivative in terms of
AND a constant multiple of the same or other derivative. It was clear to me that
can be rewritten in that form so I did the working and it just fell out.
Last edited by Farhan.Hanif93; 03-06-2012 at 04:45.