You are Here: Home

# Gradient of unit vectors in Spherical Coords Tweet

Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
1. Gradient of unit vectors in Spherical Coords
Hi there,

I'm doing a past paper (second year physics) and it's asking about the gradient of a cartesian coordinate z in terms of and . The question is as follows:
In terms of spherical polar coordinates the Cartesian coordinates are given by
; and
Furthermore

(ii) Express in terms of and .
Okay, so I attempted to use the definition of gradient in spherical coordinates:

Where (I assume this is correct for spherical - it works in Cartesian at least!)
But this doesn't give the correct result when applied to the vector given in the question.
After a bit of playing around with it I realised that it works if

And this gives the correct value as provided in the mark scheme. I emailed my lecturer and he replied and said:
The correct formula is

this simply requires the function of a function rule.
Which seems to be in contradiction to every textbook and internet resource I can find. How can this be correct?

But taking what he said about a function of a function rule I deduce that

If I substitute df, dr etc for etc then it seems to work, but that doesn't feel 'right' as I'd have to define an infinitesimal change in these quantities to be equal to their gradient...which just sounds plain wrong to me.
So, anyone got any ideas about how this might be resolved?

Thanks for taking the time to read this - please don't let my beautiful latex-ing go to waste!

(oh and apparently this question is suppose to take under 5 minutes)
Last edited by Manitude; 02-06-2012 at 22:36.
2. Re: Gradient of unit vectors in Spherical Coords
Your lecturer's (vector) formula

is really, taking a component at a time, three scalar formulas in one:

Those all look to me like applications of the chain rule.
3. Re: Gradient of unit vectors in Spherical Coords
(Original post by Jonny W)
Your lecturer's (vector) formula

is really, taking a component at a time, three scalar formulas in one:

Those all look to me like applications of the chain rule.
Yes, I think I can see how this works. By taking the sum (with the appropriate unit vectors put in place?) and then factorising, the expressions for gradient can be obtained.

Thanks!