A question from 2007 Jane C4

Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. 041087's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 90
    A question from 2007 Jane C4
    hi guys,i have a question to ask which say the following
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	未命名.JPG 
Views:	27 
Size:	35.4 KB 
ID:	153495
    the marking stated that ln y = −ln(x−1) + 2ln(2x−3) + c,why so?
  2. notnek's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Location: Bangkok, Thailand
    Re: A question from 2007 Jane C4
    Which part don't you understand? Both of those fractions are in the form:

    \dfrac{kf'(x)}{f(x)}

    where f'(x) is the derivative of f(x). The integral of this form is given by

    k\ln(f(x)) + c

    Try differentiating the solution and it may make more sense.
  3. theandyguthrie's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Posts: 302
    Re: A question from 2007 Jane C4
    You can only take ln of the bottom to be the integral if the top of the fraction is equal to the derivative of the bottom.

    So we need to change the constant on the numerators, to be equal to the derivative of the denominator.


    For the first fraction the derivative of the bottom is 1.
    So we need to multiply by -1 to make it equal.
    And then we can take ln. Giving -ln(x-1)


    For the second fraction the derivative of the bottom is 2, and the top is 4.
    So we need to divide by 2, which means we much multiply by 2 to keep it equal.
    So then integral equal 2ln(2x-3)

    and then plus c
  4. AndrewJames's Avatar
    • Junior Member
    • Posts: 31
    Re: A question from 2007 Jane C4
    dy/ y = lny as it is just 1 /y dy , -1/(x-1)---> -ln(x-1) as it has no powers in the denominator. and 4/(2x-3)-----> 2ln(2x-3) because you do it like normal logs and would have 4ln(2x-3) but you have to divide by the differential of the denominator (2x-3) which in this case is 2 so it becomes 2ln(2x-3) also be aware that you could also move that two to become a power.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.