Hi! Are there any real advantages in studying something else first and then going on to do the grad law course? I mean wouldn't it be easier to get a job after a solid 3-year background in law? In my case, I've got an offer from Warwick Law School for the LLB. But then I also applied to Cambridge to study history and have an offer from Girton College. These are the two choices I'm willing to consider and I'm having a DAMN hard time deciding which one to choose. I want to practice law some day, but I really do enjoy studying history. However, history isnt a strictly vocational course, so I guess I am worried that if I take history Ill be at a disadvantage if I want to become a lawyer. Also, if you take the CPE route to qualification, can you apply to do an LLM (or do most unis require an undergraduate degree in law)? Any advice/insights welcome!