The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 300
Original post by Hopple
Dunno what the rape figures were back in the old days before porn, but I'd bet it was a heck of a lot higher than it is now.


Ahh, but then attitudes towards women were even worse back then.

What was it the old wedding vows used to say, if you were a woman? "Love, honour and obey"? The men's vows omitted the obey.

Also, up until 1990, the law didn't recognise marital rape as rape, and domestic abuse wasn't outlawed until 1960s.
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by dizzy09
Actually, there's an interesting post on porn addiction in another thread; will see if I can find it, and add it later. But porn does provide a damaging view of women; not all men absorb it, but a lot of men do. Without damaging views of women, rape would actually decrease.


People become addicted to lots of things. Or to put it another way, reliant. Men rely on porn to satisfy their sexual urges and thats just the way it is. This damaging views of women business is nonsense. Male sexuality wants to see women engaged in sexual activities. If you find that to be a damaging view then thats your issue.

I also oppose prostitution, because of the high level of VAW that occurs through prostitution. It's a minority of men who turn to prostitution, and the number of women leaving the prostitution industry who later talk of being raped is alarming.


Legalization and regulation would increase social acceptability and so the number of men who turn to prostitution and also protect the women from rape and "VAW".
Reply 302
Original post by green.tea
People become addicted to lots of things. Or to put it another way, reliant. Men rely on porn to satisfy their sexual urges and thats just the way it is. This damaging views of women business is nonsense. Male sexuality wants to see women engaged in sexual activities. If you find that to be a damaging view then thats your issue.
Not all men interact with porn. And yes, men wish to see women engaged in sexual activity, but for me, there's the issue of women who are raped in making porn; it may be a minority, but how can you be fully sure the woman you're watching on screen hasn't been coerced or threatened into the industry?


Legalization and regulation would increase social acceptability and so the number of men who turn to prostitution and also protect the women from rape and "VAW".
I'm not sure it increasing the number of men who turn to prostitution is a good thing. I'm also unsure of the effects legislation has on increasing protection of women; I'll have a look for literature on the issue tomorrow (later today, even)

Just a quick aside; you believe pornography/prostitution is a good thing. Out of curiousity, how would you feel if your younger sister entered the industry? (If you don't have one, imagine.) Let's say 25 years down the line, you had an 18 year old daughter... Would you be willing for her to enter the industry?
Reply 303
Original post by dizzy09
If you aren't going to rape, they don't apply to you. 10 should be obvious to everyone, but alarmingly, following the Ched Evans case, I saw a tweet from a rather naive young man (18,19 I believe) who quite obviously stated "I thought it was only rape if she says no". It's not the case. If she shows any sign she doesn't want sex, and this is going to be stating the obvious to you, then you stop. Some men need rape defined to them.

So as a non-rapist, there's nothing I can do, as a man, to prevent rape? **** it, I'll still walk people home, and aim to go in a group for my own protection too.

This is true, wrt them not being prevention tips. However, the aftercare of survivors can go a long way to helping tackle attitudes about rape, thus possibly preventing a rape. I've heard women speak up and say "I didn't realise it was rape", and there's going to be men with the same issue. WRT getting out of an abusive relationship; it's easier said than done. I'm not sure if it's the same for men, but for women, leaving an abusive relationship can be the most dangerous period in a relationship. It's not as simple as "just leave". The victim needs to be aware they're being abused (you'd be surprised how many women brush their abuse off), they need an escape route, and they need to know they'll be supported if they leave.

Seems like you're saying women need more advice on how to avoid rape, or at least stop it happening again :s-smilie: Yes it's easier said than done, but women (and men) do need to leave abusive relationships.


No, I wouldn't say it'd be putting the woman at fault if she doesn't follow it; abusive relationships are extremely complex.

So why do you say it's putting women at fault if someone advises them on how to stay safe?

It does need to be recognised the risks the woman would be at in leaving a relationship. With regards to rape happening out of the blue; which it does... a lot; I think, wrt your comment about women being paranoid of men as a result, oh, this happens. Strangely enough, you know what helps? I found, as a rape survivor, that hearing male friends actively speaking out against violence against women, without knowing what I'd been through, helped restore that trust a little. It helped prove not every man was like my attackers. That's something women can't do quite as easily, especially when you consider how many women are raped in their lifetimes. I'm more trusting of men who challenge rape jokes, poor attitudes of women and victim blaming than I am of those who make rape jokes, victim blame and hold poor attitudes of women.


That's good to do, but again it won't really prevent rape, just help victims come back into society. I'm also unsure of why a rapist would be deterred from treating women like objects, unless you're talking about an eventual aim of massive social engineering to get men to never let a woman's appearance decide whether he goes to try and chat her up - something that would involve women changing their attitudes of image drastically too - and hope that alienates rapists to the extent that they try to conform.

But women aren't property; we're people.

I don't get what you're trying to say here :s-smilie: I wouldn't give a piece of property advice, but I would give a person advice, on how to protect themselves or their property.

Whereas it may make sense to say "Don't walk down a poorly lit alleyway at night", it makes no sense to me, as my house is down a poorly lit alleyway. Whereas it may make sense to say "Don't go out wearing a short skirt", it makes no sense to me, as what you wear has no bearing on your probability of being a rape victim. Whereas saying "have a friend walk you home" makes sense to you, it makes no sense to me, when my friends live 20 miles away from me, or when I was attacked by a friend who was supposed to be "protecting" me.

Not sure if this is making sense or not.


Just because some advice isn't relevant to you specifically doesn't mean it's bad to give it in general. You can stick an "if possible" on the end of the alley and friend advice and it would be sensible, but I'd have thought that was implied.


Original post by dizzy09
Ahh, but then attitudes of women were even worse back then.

What was it the old wedding vows used to say, if you were a woman? "Love, honour and obey"? The men's vows omitted the obey.

I think men had 'keep' instead, meaning to look after/provide for, but I see your point.

Also, up until 1990, the law didn't recognise marital rape as rape, and domestic abuse wasn't outlawed until 1960s.


How can you know that porn means more rape though?
Original post by dizzy09
Not all men interact with porn. And yes, men wish to see women engaged in sexual activity, but for me, there's the issue of women who are raped in making porn; it may be a minority, but how can you be fully sure the woman you're watching on screen hasn't been coerced or threatened into the industry?


Thats like saying how can you be sure the car your buying isnt stolen. If anything its an argument for greater acceptance and legitimisation of the industry.

I'm not sure it increasing the number of men who turn to prostitution is a good thing. I'm also unsure of the effects legislation has on increasing protection of women; I'll have a look for literature on the issue tomorrow (later today, even)


Its seems obvious that legalisation would bring establishments that could operate openly with security and legal protection of the type those involved in the underworld dont have due to fear of prosecution.

Just a quick aside; you believe pornography/prostitution is a good thing. Out of curiousity, how would you feel if your younger sister entered the industry? (If you don't have one, imagine.) Let's say 25 years down the line, you had an 18 year old daughter... Would you be willing for her to enter the industry?


Id certainly rather the law was changed to afford sisters and daughters who are prostitutes greater protection and also make the streets safer for everyone by giving people socially acceptable outlets. Same with porn.
I guess....


If he was good looking and she was an fat ugly mother****er.......

....... people would care 95% less....?
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 306
Original post by Hopple
So as a non-rapist, there's nothing I can do, as a man, to prevent rape? **** it, I'll still walk people home, and aim to go in a group for my own protection too.
I meant number 10 doesn't apply to you. But please, still challenge rape jokes, poor language wrt women. Please speak up, and please support rape survivors. If you feel a man is acting in a threatening manner towards a woman, step in. Seriously, something as simple as "Is this man bothering you", directed to the woman, not the man, can make the man aware that not only are you suspicious of him, but should he rape this woman, there's someone who's noted his behaviour.


Seems like you're saying women need more advice on how to avoid rape, or at least stop it happening again :s-smilie: Yes it's easier said than done, but women (and men) do need to leave abusive relationships.
No, women need advice on leaving abusive relationships. You can live in an abusive relationship, and never be raped. Or you can be raped in a relationship, and that's the first sign of any violence towards you. Helping women leave abusive relationships isn't advising them on how to avoid rape.



So why do you say it's putting women at fault if someone advises them on how to stay safe?

Let's suppose a woman ignores all the "advice" on avoiding rape. I'll go with some of the ones I've heard.
"Don't go out alone" - she goes out alone
"Don't go out after dark" - she goes out after dark
"Don't wear that dress" - and she wears it.

If she then gets raped, because these rape myths on how to stay safe exist, she'd then get told, either by other people, or by her subconscious, "You should have stayed in; it was after dark, you were alone, and you were wearing that dress..." That is deflecting responsibility on to the woman, and thus blaming her for being the victim of a crime. It also reinforces the belief that there's different types of rape, thus leading to victims of rape by a stranger being treated differently to victims of rape by an acquaintance, and victims of rape by a partner. Just one rape prevention tip to a woman, who subsequently gets raped regardless, can have a huge knock on effect on how she views the crime and her own responsibility as a result.



That's good to do, but again it won't really prevent rape, just help victims come back into society. I'm also unsure of why a rapist would be deterred from treating women like objects, unless you're talking about an eventual aim of massive social engineering to get men to never let a woman's appearance decide whether he goes to try and chat her up - something that would involve women changing their attitudes of image drastically too - and hope that alienates rapists to the extent that they try to conform.

Again, it's a knock on effect. When survivors speak out about rape, and their supporters speak out against rape, it sends out a message to the rapists among society, that rape won't be tolerated, and that survivors aren't willing to be silenced. It's working against the psych (I've forgotten the word) of the rapist, whose attacks rely on the survivor remaining silent. Speaking out against rape says "If you rape someone, we're not staying quiet about it," thus challenging the rapist fear, power and control tactic - You can't control someone if they're already in control. You could also look at it this way; is a rapist more likely to attack if he believes a woman will go to the police about it, or if he thinks she'll shut up, and he'll get away with it?


I don't get what you're trying to say here :s-smilie: I wouldn't give a piece of property advice, but I would give a person advice, on how to protect themselves or their property.
My point was, women aside, everything you listed was property. In listing women in that manner, you're arguing that women are property that need protecting.



Just because some advice isn't relevant to you specifically doesn't mean it's bad to give it in general. You can stick an "if possible" on the end of the alley and friend advice and it would be sensible, but I'd have thought that was implied.

OK, most rapes happen in the bedroom. Advice to women everywhere, stay out of the bedroom.

Do you see the problem there?



I think men had 'keep' instead, meaning to look after/provide for, but I see your point.

I don't even need to add anything to that, do I? :biggrin: So glad wedding vows have changed...



How can you know that porn means more rape though?
I think, IIRC, a VERY large number of rapists were/are porn users. I'll have to try and find the source. Again, this doesn't mean all porn users will be rapists, just that most rapists are porn users
Reply 307
Original post by green.tea
Thats like saying how can you be sure the car your buying isnt stolen. If anything its an argument for greater acceptance and legitimisation of the industry.

I think we're always going to look at this from opposing views, aren't we? :smile:



Its seems obvious that legalisation would bring establishments that could operate openly with security and legal protection of the type those involved in the underworld dont have due to fear of prosecution.
I don't agree with prostitutes being prosecuted; never have done. A large number of them are very vulnerable women. But I'd rather see a crack down on the men who use, and changes attitudes towards prostitution, which would mean prostitutes who had experienced sexual related violence would find it easier to come forward. I'd also rather see the fact so many women who enter prostitution come from poverty based backgrounds, or the care system challenged. It suggests we need to tackle poverty a lot more effectively than we are now, and we need to fix the care system. If the care system is putting girls at risk, it's not working.



Id certainly rather the law was changed to afford sisters and daughters who are prostitutes greater protection and also make the streets safer for everyone by giving people socially acceptable outlets. Same with porn.
I'd rather women weren't villified for it, but I'd also want to see an overhaul on a society which thinks porn and prostitution is an acceptable career choice for women.
Original post by dizzy09
I think we're always going to look at this from opposing views, aren't we? :smile:

I don't agree with prostitutes being prosecuted; never have done. A large number of them are very vulnerable women. But I'd rather see a crack down on the men who use, and changes attitudes towards prostitution, which would mean prostitutes who had experienced sexual related violence would find it easier to come forward. I'd also rather see the fact so many women who enter prostitution come from poverty based backgrounds, or the care system challenged. It suggests we need to tackle poverty a lot more effectively than we are now, and we need to fix the care system. If the care system is putting girls at risk, it's not working.

I'd rather women weren't villified for it, but I'd also want to see an overhaul on a society which thinks porn and prostitution is an acceptable career choice for women.


Your not being pragmatic.
Reply 309
Original post by Mistersjmcg
I guess....


If he was good looking and she was an fat ugly mother****er.......

....... people would care 95% less....?


I know I wouldn't care less. A rape is a rape, and each survivor should be treated with the same level of care and respect
Reply 310
Original post by dizzy09
I meant number 10 doesn't apply to you. But please, still challenge rape jokes, poor language wrt women. Please speak up, and please support rape survivors. If you feel a man is acting in a threatening manner towards a woman, step in. Seriously, something as simple as "Is this man bothering you", directed to the woman, not the man, can make the man aware that not only are you suspicious of him, but should he rape this woman, there's someone who's noted his behaviour.

Fair enough, but you should know, and I doubt I'm alone here, I'm not keen on being assumed to being a rapist - especially online when there isn't the immediate 'threat' of me in the same room. That whole page addressed me as someone who was thinking about raping women.

No, women need advice on leaving abusive relationships. You can live in an abusive relationship, and never be raped. Or you can be raped in a relationship, and that's the first sign of any violence towards you. Helping women leave abusive relationships isn't advising them on how to avoid rape.

That's hardly a distinction. You'd advise someone on how to avoid being the victim of (further) crime, but not rape?

Let's suppose a woman ignores all the "advice" on avoiding rape. I'll go with some of the ones I've heard.
"Don't go out alone" - she goes out alone
"Don't go out after dark" - she goes out after dark
"Don't wear that dress" - and she wears it.

If she then gets raped, because these rape myths on how to stay safe exist, she'd then get told, either by other people, or by her subconscious, "You should have stayed in; it was after dark, you were alone, and you were wearing that dress..." That is deflecting responsibility on to the woman, and thus blaming her for being the victim of a crime. It also reinforces the belief that there's different types of rape, thus leading to victims of rape by a stranger being treated differently to victims of rape by an acquaintance, and victims of rape by a partner. Just one rape prevention tip to a woman, who subsequently gets raped regardless, can have a huge knock on effect on how she views the crime and her own responsibility as a result.

I suppose the question is, then, if everyone were to take these precautions, how many fewer rapes would occur?
Again, it's a knock on effect. When survivors speak out about rape, and their supporters speak out against rape, it sends out a message to the rapists among society, that rape won't be tolerated, and that survivors aren't willing to be silenced. It's working against the psych (I've forgotten the word) of the rapist, whose attacks rely on the survivor remaining silent. Speaking out against rape says "If you rape someone, we're not staying quiet about it," thus challenging the rapist fear, power and control tactic - You can't control someone if they're already in control. You could also look at it this way; is a rapist more likely to attack if he believes a woman will go to the police about it, or if he thinks she'll shut up, and he'll get away with it?

Yeah, that makes sense. I still think it's reasonable to advise on how to avoid becoming a victim though, it might dissuade some from reporting but that needs to be addressed without leaving women with no preventative measures.

My point was, women aside, everything you listed was property. In listing women in that manner, you're arguing that women are property that need protecting.

No, I'm not saying women are property. How else can I phrase it? You still protect yourself.

You can have advice on avoiding being robbed or murdered, and I guess where it's a significant risk, how to avoid being kidnapped too.
OK, most rapes happen in the bedroom. Advice to women everywhere, stay out of the bedroom.

Do you see the problem there?

What can you do about these though? Except for get women to get out after the first time and warn other potential victims. And keep her eyes open for possible warning signs prior to being raped. Nobody else is going to know better than the two in teh relationship.
I don't even need to add anything to that, do I? :biggrin: So glad wedding vows have changed...

I think, IIRC, a VERY large number of rapists were/are porn users. I'll have to try and find the source. Again, this doesn't mean all porn users will be rapists, just that most rapists are porn users


I'd assume that was correlation only, any causation would be from their personality which made them want to look at porn and want to rape women.
Reply 311
Original post by Hopple
Fair enough, but you should know, and I doubt I'm alone here, I'm not keen on being assumed to being a rapist - especially online when there isn't the immediate 'threat' of me in the same room. That whole page addressed me as someone who was thinking about raping women.
The page didn't address you as a specific, it addressed you as a general. This is what happens when women talk candidly about rape; men get uncomfortable... Why is that? Do you not think telling us to not do x, y and z, so we don't get raped makes us uncomfortable?


That's hardly a distinction. You'd advise someone on how to avoid being the victim of (further) crime, but not rape?
Where domestic abuse is involved, there are usually warning signs. There aren't with rape. Once your friend tells you the warning signs of domestic abuse, you can advise them to leave. But you can't advise them on how to protect themselves if they make the decision to stay, and the relationship does turn abusive. But under your logic, for rape, seeing as there's no warning signs before a rape, then...well, women best never be in the presence of men.



I suppose the question is, then, if everyone were to take these precautions, how many fewer rapes would occur?
Not many; They account for less than 15% of all rapes. Some accounts put them as low as 10%, and some rapes occur in the day time. So, y'know...

Yeah, that makes sense. I still think it's reasonable to advise on how to avoid becoming a victim though, it might dissuade some from reporting but that needs to be addressed without leaving women with no preventative measures.
The reporting rate is 10 - 15%. We don't need more women put off reporting. And no, there's no way to "avoid" becoming a victim. How do women know who rapists are? I mean, it's not like they have "RAPIST" stamped on their forehead. So, how does a woman "avoid" getting raped by her boyfriend? Or her male friend? Or her father?


No, I'm not saying women are property. How else can I phrase it? You still protect yourself.
Funny how men are never told to protect themselves...

You can have advice on avoiding being robbed or murdered, and I guess where it's a significant risk, how to avoid being kidnapped too.
"DON'T GO OUT WEARING A SLIPKNOT HOODIE, YOU MIGHT GET MURDERED!"... Yeah, never heard that one before. I've heard advice on how to avoid being robbed, but that's to protect possessions. Never heard advice on how to avoid being murdered though. Or assaulted.

What can you do about these though? Except for get women to get out after the first time and warn other potential victims. And keep her eyes open for possible warning signs prior to being raped. Nobody else is going to know better than the two in teh relationship.
What warning signs come before being raped, then? Do enlighten me.


I'd assume that was correlation only, any causation would be from their personality which made them want to look at porn and want to rape women.
Actually, if you bear in mind porn is effectively rape; I mean, do you really believe that the woman on your monitor wants to have sex with every man she's put in front of? Is it really more justifiable if she's being paid to change her mind into having sex with them?
Reply 312
Original post by dizzy09
The page didn't address you as a specific, it addressed you as a general. This is what happens when women talk candidly about rape; men get uncomfortable... Why is that? Do you not think telling us to not do x, y and z, so we don't get raped makes us uncomfortable?

It assumes I am a rapist, not that I might be a victim. Perhaps I'm used to taking precautions and think they're sensible, but I think it's fair enough to dislike being assumed guilty?


Where domestic abuse is involved, there are usually warning signs. There aren't with rape. Once your friend tells you the warning signs of domestic abuse, you can advise them to leave. But you can't advise them on how to protect themselves if they make the decision to stay, and the relationship does turn abusive. But under your logic, for rape, seeing as there's no warning signs before a rape, then...well, women best never be in the presence of men.

What warning signs come before being raped, then? Do enlighten me.


I would say domestic abuse is a warning sign of rape. Not for all rape, of course, but a lot of what you're describing. Presumably they'd have seemed decent enough initially, then gone downhill.

Not many; They account for less than 15% of all rapes. Some accounts put them as low as 10%, and some rapes occur in the day time. So, y'know...

And how many rapes would there not have been without this advice out there?


The reporting rate is 10 - 15%. We don't need more women put off reporting. And no, there's no way to "avoid" becoming a victim. How do women know who rapists are? I mean, it's not like they have "RAPIST" stamped on their forehead. So, how does a woman "avoid" getting raped by her boyfriend? Or her male friend? Or her father?

Ok, at the very least she can avoid being raped again. I'm not saying all rapes can be avoided, but unless you're saying all such rapes come out of the blue, there will be warning signs that could help your chances.

Funny how men are never told to protect themselves...

"DON'T GO OUT WEARING A SLIPKNOT HOODIE, YOU MIGHT GET MURDERED!"... Yeah, never heard that one before. I've heard advice on how to avoid being robbed, but that's to protect possessions. Never heard advice on how to avoid being murdered though. Or assaulted.

I think rape is seen as a combination of worse and more likely, hence it is publicised more. I've been told various things for my own safety, like the stuff about avoiding quiet places, but I suppose you don't notice it as much as, for example, the posters on the tube about minicabs.

What would you want, for men to have adverts telling them they could be raped and how to avoid it? Personally, I don't think I'd be as fussed as you seem to be. Not taking unlicensed minicabs makes sense, staying in a group makes sense - the only thing that I might scoff at is not dresing revealingly, but you dismiss that too.
Actually, if you bear in mind porn is effectively rape; I mean, do you really believe that the woman on your monitor wants to have sex with every man she's put in front of? Is it really more justifiable if she's being paid to change her mind into having sex with them?


You could say the same for the man, he probably wouldn't have sex with all those women if he weren't paid. If you really wanted to count that as rape, then you'd be seriously diluting the meaning, as it is consensual.
Reply 313
Original post by Happydude
Let's face it, neither of the beatings your acquaintances received will be as psychologically damaging as a rape. Of course I wouldn't be comfortable in a position similar to which she was, but as a male I wouldn't have the fear of sexual assault.

Your scheme is extraneous. All that is needed is for bus drivers not to be morons. Leaving a girl stranded at 3am is a moronic thing to do. I don't care much for solutions or how similarly males may suffer after being rejected from a bus. She was raped.


I totally agree that rape is the most serious crime (barring murder at least), but in a situation where both genders are vulnerable on the street at night and you are fully able to help both I cannot see why you wouldn't, it's not as if they're mutually exclusive. By assisting women in this way you're shielding them not only from rape but also from murder, assault and mugging, things which men, especially smaller men, are equally vulnerable to. Men out alone and walking in the middle of the night have been killed, I'm sure sure you know that as well as I do - whether men are statistically less vulnerable to this I don't know, but why take any chances? The issue of vulnerability with this sort of crime is much more complex than mere gender. Helping one gender but not the other in society generally is to stumble into a disaster, and it just seems to be best avoided; in my own opinion it's right to not make that distinction. I would still suggest making these changes to the bus service even if the concept of rape didn't exist.

It was indeed a completely silly thing to do. Though the problem with from this point onwards simply waving people on who don't have their fare (whether male or female) is that it leaves the bus companies open to being abused; with your own suggestion no girl would ever need bus fare on a night out again, she could just say she doesn't have it - especially in the wake of a girl being so brutally raped after being turned away; all night-bus drivers will have that playing on their conscience if they turn customers away now, it's wrong for people to deliberately take advantage of that. Cynical, I know, but we live in a world where people would try it, and then the bus company's profits would be damaged through no fault of their own. It's right that we retain an incentive to pay wherever possible, but to retain a back-up where they are able to defer payment if they can't.
(edited 11 years ago)
There Is another GROUP who have just as much as blame as anyone
That's the people who try to scam there way on to buses and it's because people like them that this genuine, desperate, innocent girl couldn't get onto the bu
s :ashamed2:
Original post by dizzy09
I don't agree with prostitutes being prosecuted; never have done. A large number of them are very vulnerable women. But I'd rather see a crack down on the men who use, and changes attitudes towards prostitution, which would mean prostitutes who had experienced sexual related violence would find it easier to come forward. I'd also rather see the fact so many women who enter prostitution come from poverty based backgrounds, or the care system challenged. It suggests we need to tackle poverty a lot more effectively than we are now, and we need to fix the care system. If the care system is putting girls at risk, it's not working.


This seems rather simplistic and one-sided; whilst I completely agree that a more sensitive and caring approach should be taken towards women who have to resort to prostitution, I don't think the solution is as simple as shifting the balance towards an increased volume of men being arrested and punished. Despite what you may assume, the men who use prostitutes are likely just as vulnerable and troubled as the prostitutes (even if outwardly they may be arrogant and abusive, the trick is what's under the surface). Visiting prostitutes is not normal behaviour and instead it would surely be better that a focus is placed on the psychological problems which caused certain men to resort to visiting prostitutes, rather than simply criminalising them. A caring and understanding approach should be taken to both parties involved to assess how they ended up in that position. I feel that your implication is that prostitutes are poor, vulnerable and defenceless (probably true - and should be treated as such) whilst the men are perverts and barbarians who can't really be helped. As I said, I think that's rather one-sided.

Original post by dizzy09
Actually, if you bear in mind porn is effectively rape; I mean, do you really believe that the woman on your monitor wants to have sex with every man she's put in front of? Is it really more justifiable if she's being paid to change her mind into having sex with them?


Aren't you making rather sexist implications about the men involved in porn here? Again, you have to look at it from both sides; the implication here seems to be that the women have been dragged into porn out of desperation but conversely the men involved are there completely by choice and love their job; you cannot make that generalisation. If you aren't making that generalisation, why are the women being raped but not the men? Whilst it may be true that male porn stars have a better reputation among men than female ones do among women, that does not mean that the females involved regret their position and are actually rather choosy with their sexual partners whilst the men love it and will sleep with anything. It would be stereotyping to suggest otherwise. My suspicion is that actually a huge number of porn stars of both sex do it completely by choice, though that's not a position I can prove. A recurrent theme here however seems to be the idea that men will naturally take sex wherever they can get it, be it by paying for it or being paid to get it, as if that's normal behaviour, I don't think that's fair.

If you feel a man is acting in a threatening manner towards a woman, step in. Seriously, something as simple as "Is this man bothering you", directed to the woman, not the man, can make the man aware that not only are you suspicious of him, but should he rape this woman, there's someone who's noted his behaviour.


This works if the woman is indeed in danger, but if she's not she may take offence from the implication that she needs protecting and is defenceless and so on. I've seen it happen, with a kind of "I can take care of myself, thanks :rolleyes:" attitude in response.

On the other hand, I completely agree with this:


If she then gets raped, because these rape myths on how to stay safe exist, she'd then get told, either by other people, or by her subconscious, "You should have stayed in; it was after dark, you were alone, and you were wearing that dress..." That is deflecting responsibility on to the woman, and thus blaming her for being the victim of a crime. It also reinforces the belief that there's different types of rape, thus leading to victims of rape by a stranger being treated differently to victims of rape by an acquaintance, and victims of rape by a partner. Just one rape prevention tip to a woman, who subsequently gets raped regardless, can have a huge knock on effect on how she views the crime and her own responsibility as a result.


I agree absolutely that there's nothing worse than blaming the victim; a woman should be able to be anywhere, at any time wearing anything she chooses without the fear of rape. All too often I've heard people saying things like "She's just asking for it wearing something like that at night", and its hard to fathom how someone can take the approach that her choice of dress and location somehow justifies her being brutally raped. No one causes the rape but the rapist.
Reply 316
Not sure if someone's posted the link, but the bus company's decided to blame the driver and also imply that he should have paid the 20p out of his own pocket. Charity's charity, but you can't enforce it in company policy. Heck, if they have a "The driver has to pay up to 4% of your fare out of his own pocket if you say you don't have the money and it's late at night" policy that's ridiculous, why not lower the fare officially?
Original post by Hopple
Not sure if someone's posted the link, but the bus company's decided to blame the driver and also imply that he should have paid the 20p out of his own pocket. Charity's charity, but you can't enforce it in company policy. Heck, if they have a "The driver has to pay up to 4% of your fare out of his own pocket if you say you don't have the money and it's late at night" policy that's ridiculous, why not lower the fare officially?


I don't agree it should be out of his own pocket, but I do agree that if they're so much under late at night they should be able to be let on, or if there's a cash machine nearby and it's late at night they should be given time to go get some more money (and presumably if everyone else had already paid he'd even have the £15 change if she could only get a £20 note).
Reducing the fair to say £4.80 leaves the situation where someone might be 20p short of that, what then?
Reply 318
Original post by Hopple
It assumes I am a rapist, not that I might be a victim. Perhaps I'm used to taking precautions and think they're sensible, but I think it's fair enough to dislike being assumed guilty?
The article doesn't assume you're guilty :rolleyes:
It assumes that, unless you're having sex with people who don't want sex, you'll see point ten as irrelevant. But hey, women should be forced to constantly consider the risk of being raped; why shouldn't men be forced to consider the possibility their actions are rape?




I would say domestic abuse is a warning sign of rape. Not for all rape, of course, but a lot of what you're describing. Presumably they'd have seemed decent enough initially, then gone downhill.
Again, domestic abuse doesn't always come before rape in a relationship. In the cases where it does, a lot of DV victims don't connect what's happening to them as domestic abuse.


And how many rapes would there not have been without this advice out there?
There's no possible way of knowing that.



Ok, at the very least she can avoid being raped again. I'm not saying all rapes can be avoided, but unless you're saying all such rapes come out of the blue, there will be warning signs that could help your chances.
Oh, crikey... She can avoid being raped... :rolleyes: Really
This is effectively saying that if a woman gets raped, it's partly her fault for not seeing the warning signs. Again, what are these magical warning signs?




What would you want, for men to have adverts telling them they could be raped and how to avoid it? Personally, I don't think I'd be as fussed as you seem to be. Not taking unlicensed minicabs makes sense, staying in a group makes sense - the only thing that I might scoff at is not dresing revealingly, but you dismiss that too.
No, I'd rather see 100% of responsibility put on the rapist. Not "Oh, rape survivor didn't do this, that, x, y, z or call the pope to confess his or her sins on the way home... She should take some responsibility..." yada yada... Every time you say a woman should do x, y or z to prevent a rape, you're saying she should take some responsibility should a rape happen.

On a side note, I'm assuming you haven't heard of John Worboys, the black cab rapist? Try telling his survivors they should take a licensed cab at night; they did.


You could say the same for the man, he probably wouldn't have sex with all those women if he weren't paid. If you really wanted to count that as rape, then you'd be seriously diluting the meaning, as it is consensual.


May I refer you to this? It's a bit of an eye opener, uneasy reading, and extremely triggering. Women in porn are routinely raped for entertainment. And it has a knock on effect.
I think the passengers of the bus deserve more vitriol than the driver.


**** them all.



It should make me feel good that in situations like this I will always help out, but all it does is make me an even bigger misanthrope. ****ing humans.

Latest

Trending

Trending