(Original post by UniOfLife)
This is getting stupid. OK then, pork is bad for you is a true religious statement made by a religion that science hasn't discovered yet. Happy? I'll contend that science has not yet found the reason for why pork is bad. Now you cannot possibly ever disprove my statement.
Allow me, though, to take you back to your original statement which I took issue with:
"What has your religion taught you than (sic) science and secular morality would not have done?"
If we take this as a simple question then there are plenty such things, including not to eat pork.
However, you meant to ask "what observable facts has religion taught that observation cannot teach" which is clearly a stupid and empty question.