G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme

Physics exam discussion - share revision tips in preparation for GCSE, A Level and other physics exams and discuss how they went afterwards.

Announcements Posted on
Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera 21-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. joefoxon's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 125
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    Apparently it states on the Astronomy spec that on the delta lambda/lambda = v/c, you have to use the un-redshifted wavelength on the bottom, which would be the 480. I don't think it says that on the physics spec, so it may be ok to use 393.
  2. zabuzar's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 11
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    (Original post by joefoxon)
    Apparently it states on the Astronomy spec that on the delta lambda/lambda = v/c, you have to use the un-redshifted wavelength on the bottom, which would be the 480. I don't think it says that on the physics spec, so it may be ok to use 393.
    what do you mean physics spec?
    in the book it says : " where 'delta lambda' is the change of wavelength, and 'lambda' is the original wavelength"
  3. joefoxon's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 125
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    The specification.

    The original wavelength would be the one that wasn't redshifted, so the 480.
  4. zabuzar's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 11
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    god, you just gave me a heart attack
    wow
    look at the question paper again, its in the first post, the 480.0nm is the spectrum from distant galaxy
    it threw me off too that the redshifted one is so rounded and 'perfect' and the original isn't.
  5. joefoxon's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 125
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    But the one as viewed from Earth WILL be redshifted, so you want to use the 480.
  6. Pachydermal's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 11
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    if you look at the wording it says "spectrum of calcium as observed from a source on earth and from a distant galaxy" so the 393.4 one is the non redshifted one
  7. bdfzyt's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 115
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    can we get 1 mark if used 480.....?
  8. zabuzar's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 11
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    thank you
    at least i used the correct values
  9. rikhilrai's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 16
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    You have to use the 393.4 nm wavelength on the bottom of the equation d(lamda)/lamda = v/c.

    For the galaxy question:

    F = GMm/r^2
    = (6.67x10^-11 . 10^41 x 10^41)/(4x10^22)^2
  10. joefoxon's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 125
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    The source as observed from Earth was 393.4nm, the one from the galaxy was 480nm, you use the one from the galaxy, because it hasn't been redshifted.
  11. bdfzyt's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 115
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    (Original post by joefoxon)
    The source as observed from Earth was 393.4nm, the one from the galaxy was 480nm, you use the one from the galaxy, because it hasn't been redshifted.
    I also used 480. But it looks that we were wrong...
    I just wonder can we get at least 1 mark for that question..,
  12. rikhilrai's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 16
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    (Original post by joefoxon)
    The source as observed from Earth was 393.4nm, the one from the galaxy was 480nm, you use the one from the galaxy, because it hasn't been redshifted.
    Umm ... 480 nm is the wavelength observed from a distant galaxy, so I think that would be the one that was red-shifted.
  13. joefoxon's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 125
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    But we are observing the galaxy, not the Earth. And if you look at the galaxy from the galaxy. it won't be redshifted.
  14. rikhilrai's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 16
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    Hey joefoxon,
    Do you mind showing me your full working. I think I may be misunderstanding you.
    Cheers
  15. bdfzyt's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 115
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    In my opinion, the grade boundary is: A* 76, A 69, B62, C55...
    Anyone agree with me?
  16. Pachydermal's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 11
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    (Original post by joefoxon)
    But we are observing the galaxy, not the Earth. And if you look at the galaxy from the galaxy. it won't be redshifted.
    As i said a minute ago the wording was "the spectrum of calcium as observed from a source on the earth and from a distant galaxy" so you want to use the earth one as non redshifted
  17. rikhilrai's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 16
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    (Original post by Pachydermal)
    As i said a minute ago the wording was "the spectrum of calcium as observed from a source on the earth and from a distant galaxy" so you want to use the earth one as non redshifted
    Yep I agree ... thanks!
  18. Jamiethevamp's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 20
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    (Original post by zabuzar)
    i got 1320Mpc
    there was a decimal point and a digit after but i rounded to 3s.f.
    I used the value i got in my calculator and got 1320.79 then rounded to 1321? but when i wrote down the value i got i wrote 6.60x107, reckon i have still got the mark? :confused:
  19. joefoxon's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 125
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    (Original post by joefoxon)
    For the distance in MPc one I did:

    (480-393.4)/480 = v/3x10^8

    Got v ~ 5x10^7ms^-1

    Then divide by 50 to get about 1200. Can't remember the exact values though
    My working, for rikhilrai.

    The wavelengths given are the one of viewing the galaxy from the Earth, and one from viewing the galaxy from just next to the galaxy. You need to use the one from next to the galaxy (480), because from that point of view, the light would not be redshifted. By the time it reaches the Earth, there will be a shift.
  20. just george's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Posts: 357
    Re: G485 June 2012 Paper and unofficial mark scheme
    (Original post by joefoxon)
    My working, for rikhilrai.

    The wavelengths given are the one of viewing the galaxy from the Earth, and one from viewing the galaxy from just next to the galaxy. You need to use the one from next to the galaxy (480), because from that point of view, the light would not be redshifted. By the time it reaches the Earth, there will be a shift.
    hmm if you are right about this then that is officially the ****test wording i have ever seen :L
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.