Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
x

Unlock these great extras with your FREE membership

  • One-on-one advice about results day and Clearing
  • Free access to our personal statement wizard
  • Customise TSR to suit how you want to use it

Oxford to give Scots more of my taxmoney - after the Government already has!

Announcements Posted on
Find your uni forum to get talking to other applicants, existing students and your future course-mates 27-07-2015
  1. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jb_keep_walking)
    Vote 'Yes'!
    Salmond want's to keep the Queen, remain part of the EU, keep the pound, agree to keeping UK nuclear weapons based in Scotland.

    Whatever it is you think your voting 'Yes' to, it's not independence.
  2. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Cyanohydrin)
    Erm..no we absolutely do not! Scotland is in a considerable deficit at this very moment (as is almost all the western world).
    It does, in the same way the EU does. It does not spend all of the borrowed money it is given by someone else.
  3. Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisawhitmore)
    presumably, money being finite, this is coming out of the taxpayer's contribution.
    Utter garbage. Oxford Uni has numerous and diverse sources of funding.
  4. Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Electronica)
    Scotland operates on a budget surplus year in, year out
    Entirely wrong. In the last GERS report, Scotland was running a £6.4 billion deficit - and before you try and weasel out of it, that was including all oil revenues and so forth.

    At the end of the day the UK government wants to ringfence the financial sector and take it out on the ordinary individual - when most Scottish people just want rid of all the Conservatives' bull**** about competitiveness.
    If most Scottish people believed anything of the sort, they'd be idiots. They'd also be ****ting in their own greenhouse considering the masses of jobs in Scotland dependent on the financial sector.

    and it's because all the public spending - transport etc - for the UK is concentrated on London and nowhere else. I also feel sorry for the North of England.
    As do I, considering that places like Scotland get disproportionately high public spending whilst the North East and so forth get utterly shafted.
  5. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by L i b)
    Utter garbage. Oxford Uni has numerous and diverse sources of funding.
    How many are Scottish Government only? The more Oxford spends on one part of the UK, the less there is to spend on the rest.
  6. Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisawhitmore)
    How many are Scottish Government only? The more Oxford spends on one part of the UK, the less there is to spend on the rest.
    The university is not egalitarian in its spending. If it believes there is a problem in recruiting able candidates from certain places, then it can - and will - spend money on trying to attract them.
  7. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by L i b)
    The university is not egalitarian in its spending. If it believes there is a problem in recruiting able candidates from certain places, then it can - and will - spend money on trying to attract them.
    It CAN, my point is that is SHOULD NOT.

    As a taxpayer funded entity it has no right to either.
  8. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisawhitmore)
    I blame both the institution and the two Governments involved in the Scottish university funding. The central government needs to bring Scottish per capita funding down to the levels of England (a roughly 18% cut), which would probably cause the Scottish to require tuition fees (I would suggest that they can only afford the free tuition because they are given more money than England). Oxford University needs to focus on helping poor students regardless of background, instead of heaping subsidies on a small group (8% of the population)
    I can't say I know much about Oxford's funding as far as Scottish students go, but I can say that from my personal experience they couldn't be more helpful to poor students. I'm from a (very) low income family and with the financial support that Oxford offers for people in my situation, I'm going to be much better off as far as fees, costs of living etc than my friend, whose household income is over 50,000. They really do their part for low income families- fee waivers, huge grants, and there are emergency funds in place aswell.
  9. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OMGWTFBBQ)
    English Universities should ... Not try and be social equalisers
    I'd really like a justification for this statement. English universities - particularly those with a massively disproportionate privately educated intake, like Oxford - can do a great deal to aid social equality by favouring the bright over the rich. I don't see why anyone would disagree with this.

    Certainly there are some issues with the way that Scottish university funding is handled relative to English university funding, but I find the idea that universities should allow privilege to be more important than academic talent (even when it hurts them academically) to be pretty incomprehensible.
  10. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stinkerbelll)
    I can't say I know much about Oxford's funding as far as Scottish students go, but I can say that from my personal experience they couldn't be more helpful to poor students. I'm from a (very) low income family and with the financial support that Oxford offers for people in my situation, I'm going to be much better off as far as fees, costs of living etc than my friend, whose household income is over 50,000. They really do their part for low income families- fee waivers, huge grants, and there are emergency funds in place aswell.
    I'm glad to hear this, especially as I am one of those who defends Oxford when the accusations of financial elitism come around, but I still feel that your support should not be based on where you used to live, but on need.
  11. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Let us realise that the Scottish Government was given an education budget to support the education of Scots. They chose to spend that only on Scots studying in Scotland.

    Scots studying in England must acknowledge that the Scottish Government gave money which should have been allocated to them only to Scots which study in Scotland.

    I do not see why Oxford should correct this, using the tax money assigned to it for use by English students. It is the Scottish Government at fault here.
  12. Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OMGWTFBBQ)
    I do not see why Oxford should correct this, using the tax money assigned to it for use by English students. It is the Scottish Government at fault here.
    Again, Oxford has other sources of revenue and bursaries and so on tend to be met out of these. It is not a government department.
  13. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by L i b)
    Again, Oxford has other sources of revenue and bursaries and so on tend to be met out of these. It is not a government department.
    (Original post by Oxford University)

    • In 2010-11, total University income was £919.6m.
    • The University’s largest source of income continues to be external research grants and contracts. In 2010-11 41% (£376.7m) of total income was derived from external research sponsors.
    • Of the remaining income, 22% came from grants from the Higher Education Funding Council for England and the Teaching and Development Agency; 16% from academic fees; and 21% from other sources including trading activities and investments.
    I was waiting for someone to comment on alternative income sources.

    Considering the University only as an educational institution (ie. not research), 65% of its income originates from the taxpayer.

    A large proportion of the research grants will come from the taxpayer also, but that is irrelevant to this discussion.

    As such a large stakeholder, Oxford has a responsibility to the taxpayer to spend all of its income responsibly, not just the income it derives from the taxpayer.

    As such it should not be wasting income which would otherwise have been spent on the education of its students acting as a quasi-social engineering tool. It is effectively robbing the taxpayer of the value of the education it would otherwise have spent this money imparting.
  14. Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OMGWTFBBQ)
    I was waiting for someone to comment on alternative income sources.

    Considering the University only as an educational institution (ie. not research), 65% of its income originates from the taxpayer.
    I'm not sure how you manage to get to that figure provided what you've just quoted. However, to try to consider the university separately from... er... the university is absolutely daft.

    As such a large stakeholder, Oxford has a responsibility to the taxpayer to spend all of its income responsibly, not just the income it derives from the taxpayer.
    Your arse it does. You might as well argue that the state should tell people who receive some top-up benefits, but also earn a wage, how they should spend their money.

    As such it should not be wasting income which would otherwise have been spent on the education of its students acting as a quasi-social engineering tool.
    I'm not sure I'd consider trying to get the best students, regardless of where they come from, 'quasi-social engineering'. Maybe in a parallel world.
  15. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by L i b)
    I'm not sure how you manage to get to that figure provided what you've just quoted. However, to try to consider the university separately from... er... the university is absolutely daft.
    (22% HEFC funding + 16% academic fees)/(1 - 41% research income) = 65%

    I'm not sure I'd consider trying to get the best students, regardless of where they come from, 'quasi-social engineering'. Maybe in a parallel world.
    There is a difference between getting "the best students" and paying for "the best students" with my tax money.

    Your welfare analogy is not applicable as welfare claimants do not have an obligation to act in the public good.
  16. Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OMGWTFBBQ)
    (22% HEFC funding + 16% academic fees)/(1 - 41% research income) = 65%
    How are academic fees funds from the government?


    There is a difference between getting "the best students" and paying for "the best students" with my tax money.
    There really isn't...
  17. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by L i b)
    There really isn't...
    I thought you were a Conservative?
  18. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OMGWTFBBQ)
    There is a difference between getting "the best students" and paying for "the best students" with my tax money.
    The money is to be spent on attracting the best possible candidates. They should not be forced to seek candidates from England if they can use the money to attract better candidates from elsewhere.

    Your welfare analogy is not applicable as welfare claimants do not have an obligation to act in the public good.
    But Oxford is acting in the public good. It isn't spending any more money than if it limited its search to English students and is in fact getting better value for money.
  19. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OMGWTFBBQ)
    Scottish Government uses my tax money to subsidise Scottish students in Scottish Universities. Then Oxford uses my tax money to subsidise Scottish students in English Universities. English Universities should
    1. Not try and be social equalisers
    2. Not involve themselves in this ridicules politics
    3. Work in the sole interests of the taxpayers who fund them

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-18432453

    Your opinions?
    Oh here we go. I'm assuming you are English, probably a 'Little Englander'?.

    It may surprise you that Wales and Scotland actually pay taxes and send every penny down to London. In the case of Scotland they collect more money in tax than they receive back in spending from London.

    SO the Welsh and Scottish Governments have decided to go down a different education policy from England. That's it, nothing more. If you are angry about this then you need to email the british government to change this... or would you be happier that Wales and Scotland have to also pay £9,000 (seems kinda selfish from my opinion).

    Oxford does receive money from the tax payers, however it has vasts amount from research and private donors. The amount of money given to Scotland can easily fall into this category. Ultimately, in fairness to Oxford they want Scots to go down there, now as it is free in Scotland- why would anyone bother going down to England. There must be an incentive- this is it. We should all congratulate Oxford for doing this and trying to increase access to their Uni not this "what about us attitude" that is rife in England at the moment.

    So yes, we in Wales and Scotland will continue to get the free prescriptions, subsidised education, free car parking in hospitals etc. We pay taxes. If you are not happy about this, you should challenge YOUR government so they can spend money on other things rather than large scale IT projects.

    Finally, to stop this myth about how the English subsidise everyone and how bad it is for them. According to treasury figures, which region do you think receives the most money from government? Wales? Scotland? NI?, NO- it is LONDON (as this funny video of Paxman illustrates" see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gy7f8vP2QY..... skip to 2:32 to see Paxman getting annoyed)

    Essentially - stop whining!. :cool:
  20. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Oh, and by the way.

    If anybody is wondering why Oxford hasn't offered a similar scholarship to the Welsh, the answer is simple.

    The Welsh Government will subsidise the course of Welsh students WHEREVER they are taken. So in September in Oxford, Liverpool, Manchester, ICL and so forth- you will have an English student paying £9,000 (or £27,000 over 3 yrs) in fees whereas the Welsh one paying £3,300 (or £9,900 over 3 yrs) thanks to the subsidy.

    This is quite controversial. On the one hand, that Welsh student is fortunate that he will receive support from Wales. However on the other hand it is quite controversial as in effect the Welsh Government will be subsidising the English Uni's. So surely a better policy would be to go back to the old one: you only get a subsidy if you study in Wales (or elsewhere if the course is not available in Wales).

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: June 17, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Poll
Would you consider Clearing if you missed your offer?
Results and Clearing

Results are coming...

No sweat. Here's all you need to make sure you're ready

new on tsr

What's your life ambition?

Graduating, travelling, owning a business?

Useful resources
x

Think you'll be in clearing or adjustment?

Hear direct from unis that want to talk to you

Get email alerts for university course places that match your subjects and grades. Just let us know what you're studying.

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.