Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012
Maths exam discussion - share revision tips in preparation for GCSE, A Level and other maths exams and discuss how they went afterwards.
-
Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012
Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012
1.
(5 marks)
2. (i)
and 
(ii) r = 0.770 (4 marks)
(iii)
(3 marks)
3. (i) Prove ... (2 marks)
(ii)
and
(6 marks)
4. (i)

Draw staircase diagram (3 marks)
(ii) Sketch and show (2 marks)
(iii) 1.3953 (4 marks)
5. (i) Show ... (5 marks)
(ii) Sketch the rest of graph
and
(3 marks)
6. (i) Prove reduction formula (5 marks)
(ii)
(4 marks)
7. (i) a=2, b=n, c=1, d=n-1 (3 marks)
(ii)
(4 marks)
(iii) Show ... (5 marks)
8. (i)
(4 marks)
(ii)
and
(4 marks)
(iii) (2, 2) (4 marks)Last edited by Mr M; 14-06-2012 at 15:27. -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012Thanks Mr.M.(Original post by Mr M)
Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012
What did you think of the paper?
I'm looking at about 53/72 worst case scenario so potentially a mid A (85 UMS) depending on the boundaries -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012Thanks for the answers again!(Original post by Mr M)
Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012
1.
(5 marks)
2. (i)
and 
(ii) r = 0.770 (4 marks)
(iii)
(3 marks)
3. (i) Prove ... (2 marks)
(ii)
and
(6 marks)
4. (i)

Draw staircase diagram (3 marks)
(ii) Sketch and show (2 marks)
(iii) 1.3953 (4 marks)
5. (i) Show ... (5 marks)
(ii) Sketch the rest of graph
and
(3 marks)
6. (i) Prove reduction formula (5 marks)
(ii)
(4 marks)
7. (i) a=2, b=n, c=1, d=n-1 (3 marks)
(ii)
(4 marks)
(iii) Show ... (5 marks)
8. (i)
(4 marks)
(ii)
and
(4 marks)
(iii) (2, 2) (4 marks)
My query is 2ii). I had sintheta = 1/root 3 and in the exam, I forgot to do inverse sine before plugging the answer into the costheta part of r and I ended up with your answer, 0.770.
On the other thread, 0.790 seems to be the consensus. Would you mind double checking that part? -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012I've got the paper in front of me and I just tried doing it by differentiation and ended up with tantheta=1/root2 which gives a maximum of 0.769800... =0.770(Original post by CJAW)
Thanks for the answers again!
My query is 2ii). I had sintheta = 1/root 3 and in the exam, I forgot to do inverse sine before plugging the answer into the costheta part of r and I ended up with your answer, 0.770.
On the other thread, 0.790 seems to be the consensus. Would you mind double checking that part?
Last edited by Wahrheit; 14-06-2012 at 16:13. -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012I'm pleased if that's the case!(Original post by Wahrheit)
I've got the paper in front of me and I just tried doing it by differentiation and ended up with tanx=1/root2 which gives a maximum of 0.769800... =0.770
-
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012??? That doesn't sound much like the answer!(Original post by lilipop)
Hello Mr M, for Q8, I put the equation as half x^2+2x+10, would I lose any mark for it? -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012Same here, was a tough one.(Original post by wibletg)
Thanks Mr.M.
What did you think of the paper?
I'm looking at about 53/72 worst case scenario so potentially a mid A (85 UMS) depending on the boundaries -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012I meant the top part, and the bottom part I put was x+2(Original post by Mr M)
??? That doesn't sound much like the answer! -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012Oh I see. That's ok if a bit odd!(Original post by lilipop)
I meant the top part, and the bottom part I put was x+2 -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012I can't tell any more. It seemed easy to me but my students said it was harder than some of the past papers and they would probably be in a better position to judge. Remember I have taught FP2 every year since it started so know it inside out.(Original post by wibletg)
Thanks Mr.M.
What did you think of the paper?
I'm looking at about 53/72 worst case scenario so potentially a mid A (85 UMS) depending on the boundaries -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012Thanks anyway(Original post by Mr M)
I can't tell any more. It seemed easy to me but my students said it was harder than some of the past papers and they would probably be in a better position to judge. Remember I have taught FP2 every year since it started so know it inside out.
More than likely.(Original post by jamib0y)
It wasn't bad, just couldnt prove 7iii). went about it the wrong way, thats 67/72.... reckon thats 100 UMS? -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 2012I'm talking utter rubbish. It was me who got 0.790, everyone else had 0.770.(Original post by Wahrheit)
I've got the paper in front of me and I just tried doing it by differentiation and ended up with tantheta=1/root2 which gives a maximum of 0.769800... =0.770
I think FP2 has tired me out... -
Re: Mr M's OCR (not OCR MEI) Further Pure 2 answers June 20129 more?! That's horrible, good luck!(Original post by jamib0y)
Thats good, just 9 more exams to go and I'll be done/
