Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

World Heath Organisation is corrupt! Proof.

Announcements Posted on
Has your uni kept its promises? Vote now to have your say (you could even win an Apple Watch). 29-05-2015
  1. Offline

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode...Fat_Episode_1/

    Go to 53 minutes and 08 seconds and watch onward.

    This is proof that the WHO are corrupt scum.

    The very same organisation that is meant to "help" us are in fact against us and on the side of the Sugar industry
    I can just tell there are loads of lies they are telling us as well.

    What is your view on this?
    (ps watch the whole show before you comment; because the most informed comments are the best ones)
  2. Offline

    This just backs up all the other "claims" I made before.
  3. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by blueray)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode...Fat_Episode_1/

    Go to 53 minutes and 08 seconds and watch onward.

    This is proof that the WHO are corrupt scum.

    The very same organisation that is meant to "help" us are in fact against us and on the side of the Sugar industry
    I can just tell there are loads of lies they are telling us as well.

    What is your view on this?
    (ps watch the whole show before you comment; because the most informed comments are the best ones)
    Meh i like sugar ... goes well in Tea
  4. Offline

    (Original post by cl_steele)
    Meh i like sugar ... goes well in Tea
    :lol: you don't put corn syrup in your tea! Totally missed the point.
  5. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by blueray)
    :lol: you don't put corn syrup in your tea! Totally missed the point.
    you never know, i might ...
  6. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by blueray)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode...Fat_Episode_1/

    Go to 53 minutes and 08 seconds and watch onward.

    This is proof that the WHO are corrupt scum.

    The very same organisation that is meant to "help" us are in fact against us and on the side of the Sugar industry
    I can just tell there are loads of lies they are telling us as well.

    What is your view on this?
    (ps watch the whole show before you comment; because the most informed comments are the best ones)
    That isn't corruption, that's forcing their hand through their huge monetary power. :rolleyes:
  7. Offline

    (Original post by cl_steele)
    you never know, i might ...
    lol then you are likely to have lots of future health problems: fact.
  8. Offline

    (Original post by Silkielemon)
    That isn't corruption, that's blackmail. :rolleyes:
    Same thing.
  9. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Sugar is fun
  10. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by blueray)
    lol then you are likely to have lots of future health problems: fact.
    Meh, if the DM is anything to go by everything from ham to water is going to give you cancer and make you die ...
  11. Offline

    (Original post by lyle17120)
    Sugar is fun
    Don't spam.

    (Original post by cl_steele)
    Meh, if the DM is anything to go by everything from ham to water is going to give you cancer and make you die ...
    That's not true, I didn't even mention cancer.
  12. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Isn't high fructose corn syrup basically the same thing as regular table sugar?
  13. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by blueray)
    Don't spam.



    That's not true, I didn't even mention cancer.
    i didnt say you did...?
  14. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by blueray)
    Same thing.
    Hardly, just the nature of huge lobby groups with massive financial backing having a huge input to a donation to a non-profit organisation.

    Anyway, point is, WHO can either be out $400 Million - which is loads, and would mean the end to huge amounts of programs in places were you actually need it, the other side is the westerners - with all their good education - have to realise that maybe they shouldn't eat so much damn sugar.
  15. Offline

    (Original post by Silkielemon)
    Hardly, just the nature of huge lobby groups with massive financial backing having a huge input to a donation to a non-profit organisation.

    Anyway, point is, WHO can either be out $400 Million - which is loads, and would mean the end to huge amounts of programs in places were you actually need it, the other side is the westerners - with all their good education - have to realise that maybe they shouldn't eat so much damn sugar.
    That is the most terrible argument I have ever heard. They spend LOADS more on education than $460 million dollars and look at the HUGE cost on the health services.
  16. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    They are corrupt
  17. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Doesn't surprise me at all.
  18. Offline

    (Original post by boromir9111)
    Doesn't surprise me at all.
    Hmm this is a first on TSR Why not?
  19. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by blueray)
    That is the most terrible argument I have ever heard. They spend LOADS more on education than $460 million dollars and look at the HUGE cost on the health services.
    Terrible? $460 Million is over 10% of their annual budget. That would bugger up everything.

    Anyway, I agree with this is bad, but I view it with the negativity on the companies, not the WHO. Like I said, this is not corruption.
  20. Offline

    (Original post by Silkielemon)
    Terrible? $460 Million is over 10% of their annual budget. That would bugger up everything.

    Anyway, I agree with this is bad, but I view it with the negativity on the companies, not the WHO. Like I said, this is not corruption.
    Yet the WHO makes decisions that affect the food people all over the world eat.
    This is disgraceful.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: June 18, 2012
New on TSR

Taxing sugar

Should sweet foods subsidise healthy ones?

Article updates
Useful resources
x

Think you’ll be in clearing or adjustment?

Hear direct from unis that want to talk to you

Get email alerts for university course places that match your subjects and grades. Just let us know what you’re studying.

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.