Energy Transitions & the Nephelauxetic Effect

Chemistry discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera 21-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. killacam2's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 80
    Energy Transitions & the Nephelauxetic Effect
    A little help?

    Consider two Ni(II) complexes, [NiX6]4- and [NiY6]4-. If DELTAoct for both complexes is the same but B([NiX6]4-) = 2B([NiY6]4-), how would the transition energies of the spin-allowed d-d bands differ?

    Where B is the Ratio of B/Bo (the racah splitting parameters)
  2. shengoc's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    Re: Energy Transitions & the Nephelauxetic Effect
    since both are Ni(II), then any difference would be due to the difference in ligands. See whether X, Y where they are in the spectrochemical series, ie from the beta value.

    ie this question is asking you to describe how Nephelauxetic Effect arises from difference in ligands.
  3. killacam2's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 80
    Re: Energy Transitions & the Nephelauxetic Effect
    Are you sure? I think it is related to Tanabe Sugano diagrams?

    Here is my rationale in solving this. The second complex has a ß which is half of that of the first complex, hence it is smaller. A smaller ß must mean that in the complex, it has a smaller B value. If ∆oct is the same and B is smaller in the second case, then the energy transition must be smaller also. For example;

    If an observed transition energy for a complex occurs at 30∆oct/B and is observed to have the energy 30E/B, and the following values are true: ∆oct = 15000, B = 600. Our energy will therefore be 30 x 600 = 18000.

    However, if in our second case, all values remain the same, but B = 300, our energy will therefore be 30 x 300 = 9000. Hence, a smaller ß value will lead to a lower energy transition.

    Is that right? Or is it to do with the covalent character of the complex and the electron repulsion?
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.