Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
x

Unlock these great extras with your FREE membership

  • One-on-one advice about results day and Clearing
  • Free access to our personal statement wizard
  • Customise TSR to suit how you want to use it

FP2 Second Order Differentials

Announcements Posted on
Rate your uni — help us build a league table based on real student views 19-08-2015
  1. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    My question is about in what scenario to increase the power of the particular integral you choose. In the book (Edexcel FP2) it says if the particular integral is in the complementary function then you increase the power of x or t or whatever the variable is.

    I thought this was okay until I came across this example:

    \frac{d^2y}{dt^2} + 2 \frac{dy}{dt} + 2y = 2e^{-t}

    I need to find the general solution so did the standard "use the auxiliary equation to find the complementary function and then find the particular integral and put the two together to make the general solution".

    So complementary function = e^{-t}(Acos(t) + Bsin(t))

    I saw that there is the term e^{-t} in both the given differential equation and also in the complementary function so I assumed I had to increase the power of t so I tried y = \lambda te^{-t} and differentiated twice to get \frac{d^2y}{dt^2} and \frac{dy}{dt} and then substituted back into the differential to try and solve for \lambda but I just get \lambda = 0. Then I increased the power again and used y = \lambda t^{2}e^{-t} but this time the equations I got contradictory values of \lambda.

    Then I resorted to looking at the mark scheme and saw that they used y= \lambda e^{-t} and it all worked when I used it.

    Why does the rule not work? Or is it because the term in the complementary function is e^{-t}cos(t) and e^{-t}sin(t) and not actually y= \lambda e^{-t}?

    p.s. apologies for the slightly waffley question, I got overexcited whilst trying LaTeX
  2. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Windows7Pro)
    Or is it because the term in the complementary function is e^{-t}cos(t) and e^{-t}sin(t) and not actually y= \lambda e^{-t}?
    Essentially what you put: the particular integral has terms of e^{-t}cos(t) and e^{-t}sin(t) and not e^{-t} so no need to times it by t ...

    If the solution was Ae^{-t} + Be^{-kt} then you would need to multiply by t as it has one root of -1

    If the solution was e^{-t}( A+Bt) then you'd multiply by t^{2} as it has repeated roots of -1

    Hope this helps!
  3. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Ahhhhh I see I see. Thanks for confirming that.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: June 20, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

New on TSR

Rate your uni

Help build a new league table

Poll
Do you prefer exams or coursework?
Study resources
Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.