FP2 Second Order Differentials

Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. Windows7Pro's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 6
    FP2 Second Order Differentials
    My question is about in what scenario to increase the power of the particular integral you choose. In the book (Edexcel FP2) it says if the particular integral is in the complementary function then you increase the power of x or t or whatever the variable is.

    I thought this was okay until I came across this example:

    \frac{d^2y}{dt^2} + 2 \frac{dy}{dt} + 2y = 2e^{-t}

    I need to find the general solution so did the standard "use the auxiliary equation to find the complementary function and then find the particular integral and put the two together to make the general solution".

    So complementary function = e^{-t}(Acos(t) + Bsin(t))

    I saw that there is the term e^{-t} in both the given differential equation and also in the complementary function so I assumed I had to increase the power of t so I tried y = \lambda te^{-t} and differentiated twice to get \frac{d^2y}{dt^2} and \frac{dy}{dt} and then substituted back into the differential to try and solve for \lambda but I just get \lambda = 0. Then I increased the power again and used y = \lambda t^{2}e^{-t} but this time the equations I got contradictory values of \lambda.

    Then I resorted to looking at the mark scheme and saw that they used y= \lambda e^{-t} and it all worked when I used it.

    Why does the rule not work? Or is it because the term in the complementary function is e^{-t}cos(t) and e^{-t}sin(t) and not actually y= \lambda e^{-t}?

    p.s. apologies for the slightly waffley question, I got overexcited whilst trying LaTeX
  2. ThreeDaysGrace's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 6
    Re: FP2 Second Order Differentials
    (Original post by Windows7Pro)
    Or is it because the term in the complementary function is e^{-t}cos(t) and e^{-t}sin(t) and not actually y= \lambda e^{-t}?
    Essentially what you put: the particular integral has terms of e^{-t}cos(t) and e^{-t}sin(t) and not e^{-t} so no need to times it by t ...

    If the solution was Ae^{-t} + Be^{-kt} then you would need to multiply by t as it has one root of -1

    If the solution was e^{-t}( A+Bt) then you'd multiply by t^{2} as it has repeated roots of -1

    Hope this helps!
  3. Windows7Pro's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 6
    Re: FP2 Second Order Differentials
    Ahhhhh I see I see. Thanks for confirming that.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.