STEP II 2012 discussion thread
Maths exam discussion - share revision tips in preparation for GCSE, A Level and other maths exams and discuss how they went afterwards.
-
Re: STEP II 2012 discussion threadThere will be at half 4. No discussion until then.(Original post by Cayne96)
Is there a STEP III discussion thread? -
Re: STEP II 2012 discussion threadI've just created a thread for discussion, waiting for it to be approved(Original post by Farhan.Hanif93)
There will be at half 4. No discussion until then.
-
Re: STEP II 2012 discussion thread
STEP III discussion thread: http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show....php?t=2044552
-
Re: STEP II 2012 discussion threadI reckon between 65-70 for a 1.(Original post by joievee)
hey guys! I know this has been asked loads already, but was just wondering what were your (updated! :P) thoughts on the grade boundaries for this paper! (e.g. a 1 haha) THANKS
-
Re: STEP II 2012 discussion threadThis is further to the discussion on Q8.
Spoiler:Show
I don't believe that SParm's approach to the proof of the equation with p should be considered satisfactory. The intention, I believe, is to show that the given equation holds for all values of n and only then to substitute alpha,beta and q to find the expression for p.
Here's what I would write:

and only then to substitute:

etc.
Last edited by waxwing; 28-07-2012 at 17:26.