Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...
Got a breaking news topic or want to post the most recent issues for sensible, on-topic discussion? This is the forum for you.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
-
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...Hypocrisy! You got evidence for your claims?(Original post by Jackso)
The law can't prove it's taking advantage. I disagree with that, you're the one claiming otherwise. If you're going to whine about the law you've got plenty of cases to deal with, incest being illegal isn't one of them for 99.999% of the population. Also, psychological issues are likely to be the bigger problem. And no, you are completely wrong, deformities can very easily occur through the first instance.
To answer your question - No. The funny thing about this is that you know you're being a moron and unless you're desperate because you've got an eye for your sister/mother you're just doing it for attention.
-
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...This is debate and sicussion is it not? And what hell is a :P? I'd advise you not to study philosophy in the future if you have plans on doing so.(Original post by iSoftie)
Dude, go debate it somewhere else I doubt incest will be made legal (to your heart's content) anytime soon :P -
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...D:(Original post by NDGAARONDI)
This is debate and sicussion is it not? And what hell is a :P? I'd advise you not to study philosophy in the future if you have plans on doing so.
Strangely I'm not sure about philosophy but I've always have taken a liking/studying to those ancient schools of philosophy searching for secrets in antiquity or whatever. :L -
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...The age of consent in California is 18 making it illegal for his mum to have sex with him. I'm unsure if they have laws regardling intra-family sexual relationships, however, the fact that the incidents where recorded classes them as possession of indecent images of children, because the age of consent is 18. It is not pornography or else it would be a completely different matter.(Original post by Rarrgh)
Age of consent is 16, but they recorded it which means that it would be classed as pornographic material. Which in all countries I believe you must be 18. That's why she's been sent to jail. The fact it was with her son is just creepy but doesn't mean anything towards how long a jail sentence she should get.
I'm confused about the neg, can someone explain it?
In regards to her custodial sentence the jury, which we have in the UK, would most likely see it as an aggrovating factor, and so may the judge. However, I am unsure of the speicific laws in California. But in the UK these kind of issues are lawfully dealt with under the Sexual Offences Act of 2003. -
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...Where I said "if another person is harmed" I meant to say ... ISN'T!!!(Original post by SubAtomic)
Not quite sure what you are saying, what would a liberal point of view be regarding incest?
We are supposed to be an advanced species us humans, evolving. Incest seems like devolution.
Does incest not harm the fabric of society? Causes disgust and segregation? .
How is incest devolution ... please explain.
Incest may cause disgust (not sure why segregation) to others but so do a lot of other activities .... if they don't like it ... DON'T TAKE PART, only an extreme minority do anyway, just ******* leave them do it for god sake, in private, with consent, christ sake. -
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...How's lala land? Do comedians pay tax there? In fact, does anyone pay tax there? In fact, do you even have comedians? Coz from the hilarious stuff you come out with, it appears you don't need them.(Original post by Stefan1991)
This is the most horrible thing I've read, how can anyone throw a mother in prison for loving their son? Disgusting.
la la land; turn left at sanity and just keep going. -
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...Sorry... what? Do you have some sort of mental problem.(Original post by Dirac Delta Function)
How's lala land? Do comedians pay tax there? In fact, does anyone pay tax there? In fact, do you even have comedians? Coz from the hilarious stuff you come out with, it appears you don't need them.
la la land; turn left at sanity and just keep going. -
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...
I don't think it's that big of a deal, 4 years is way too long, and this is entirely consensual involving a boy who's 16 years ago, the normal legal consent age in the majority of the world. So the only thing really standing against it, is the parent/guardian, and the incest charges.
-
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...The age of consent is 13 in Japan, and 14 in china, They are functioning just fine, sex is not that disgusting, why are people so sensitive to it?(Original post by Annoying-Mouse)
Doesn't really matter what UK age of consent is. BRB ****ing a 13 year old and claiming age of consent in Spain is 13.Last edited by ncsoftlover; 23-06-2012 at 21:55. -
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...Couldn't find her on RedTube like someone else suggested so don't even bother.(Original post by geetar)
Mistie Atkinson is a bit of a porn star name. -
LOL! that's all.(Original post by NDGAARONDI)
Why? "Eww it's disgusting" is not an approriate answer as people can say that about gay sex. Laws prohibiting incest are unfounded. -
Re: Mom who made sex tape with son, 16, is jailed for four years...Why are people so inclined to label everyone to pedophile, don't you know that's define as having sexual attraction toward prepubescent children? It's normal to be attracted to 16 years old, at that age, the person has passed puberty for over 4 years.(Original post by iSoftie)
Really? She's done a lot wrong. It's morally gross AND legally she cannot record anyone in pornographic material under the age of 18 - so technically she's a paedo.
You must be pretty funny to disagree with the courts in this case..




