[xXedixXx]

Hmm. Interesting, good luck Greens! Looks like we may have a new potential coalition partner in governments to come..

[blueray]

(Original post by Metrobeans)
I've reviewed your members list and a large number of them haven't even posted in this thread. If hypothetically I was to approve this, it would still need to be discussed by admin and they would need to make a decision on whether or not approve it. If hypothetically they did approve it, it would still take a few days to setup a sub-forum, so this isn't going to happen overnight under any circumstance. I'm afraid you'll have to wait a little while longer.

Ok we will wait even longer. They haven't posted because they are waiting for a thread like I have told them.

@leaderofUkip Read what I said before about PM's.

[blueray]

(Original post by xXedixXx)
Hmm. Interesting, good luck Greens! Looks like we may have a new potential coalition partner in governments to come..

Thanks for the support

[ByronicHero]

(Original post by blueray)
Ok we will wait even longer. They haven't posted because they are waiting for a thread like I have told them.

@leaderofUkip Read what I said before about PM's.

Stop acting like somebody is in some way working against you. The admin will require a decent reason to give you a subforum and in order for Nick to want to give them his recommendation he has to believe you will be good for the HOC and in order to believe you will be good for the HOC we all have to think you are bringing something interesting and not just diluting support for an already represented position. People have asked for some broad policy aims and this has been refused. I can confirm that your application is being considered - as all are- behind the scenes and that you trying to expedite the process by circumventing the same waiting period every party hoping to form has to go through won't help you at all. If anything it harms your cause as you will just annoy people.

I have said before and I say again that I personally have nothing against your party forming but this support is contingent on you making some indication that you bring something worth having which, as far as I'm concerned, you are yet to do. Yes orchestrating discussions between 15 people can be difficult but it is in no way impossible. I suggest you write up where you would have the party stand on all of the major issues and send it to each of them for opinions. Then edit it in light of any feedback you receive and resend it. Repeat until reasonable consensus is reached. This shouldn't take more than a day or two and if it does then I question whether or not your membership will be active anyway....

[toronto353]

(Original post by blueray)
@leaderofUkip Read what I said before about PM's.

Why don't you stop whinging and start doing. You can send PMs out to people. Yes it's difficult, but you can do it. You just can't be bothered to do so. You could co-ordinate policy here or via PMs, but you choose not to do so. You could post petitions, but you choose not to do so. You could ask MPs to sponsor motions and Bills, but you choose not to do so. Frankly it's laziness and I'm fed up of you saying 'oh I can't do it. I can't send PMs'. Yes you can. You choose not to do so because you're lazy. You don't set an example to the House and to the admins that you're active, but you sit there with a can't do attitude. Either stop complaining and start getting your party working or close this party down.

Don't blame me, the Speaker, the admins or the pixies who are plotting against you. Blame yourself and your ineptitude.

[blueray]

(Original post by paddy__power)
Stop acting like somebody is in some way working against you. The admin will require a decent reason to give you a subforum and in order for Nick to want to give them his recommendation he has to believe you will be good for the HOC and in order to believe you will be good for the HOC we all have to think you are bringing something interesting and not just diluting support for an already represented position. People have asked for some broad policy aims and this has been refused. I can confirm that your application is being considered - as all are- behind the scenes and that you trying to expedite the process by circumventing the same waiting period every party hoping to form has to go through won't help you at all. If anything it harms your cause as you will just annoy people.

I have said before and I say again that I personally have nothing against your party forming but this support is contingent on you making some indication that you bring something worth having which, as far as I'm concerned, you are yet to do. Yes orchestrating discussions between 15 people can be difficult but it is in no way impossible. I suggest you write up where you would have the party stand on all of the major issues and send it to each of them for opinions. Then edit it in light of any feedback you receive and resend it. Repeat until reasonable consensus is reached. This shouldn't take more than a day or two and if it does then I question whether or not your membership will be active anyway....

(Original post by toronto353)
Why don't you stop whinging and start doing. You can send PMs out to people. Yes it's difficult, but you can do it. You just can't be bothered to do so. You could co-ordinate policy here or via PMs, but you choose not to do so. You could post petitions, but you choose not to do so. You could ask MPs to sponsor motions and Bills, but you choose not to do so. Frankly it's laziness and I'm fed up of you saying 'oh I can't do it. I can't send PMs'. Yes you can. You choose not to do so because you're lazy. You don't set an example to the House and to the admins that you're active, but you sit there with a can't do attitude. Either stop complaining and start getting your party working or close this party down.

Don't blame me, the Speaker, the admins or the pixies who are plotting against you. Blame yourself and your ineptitude.

Tell me how can you have a 15 way pm conversation and reply to all 15 pms and vice versa, it is not lazyness it is common sense.
You talk like this because you have a sub forum.
Before, in order to have a party, you needed 15 members, we have that, now it's changed, we try to adapt, the reason is above.

We are not asking for a whole sub forum, just a thread, is that too much?

If this really bothers you as it clearly does, why can't the admins just remove the 30 second pm limit for our party members until we have our polices?

Making one thread...are we asking for the world, no.
You are making it seem like we are.

We have a party,we want a thread, it's simple.

You want polcies? We will give it to you once we all agree on our thread, or our pms from no 30 sec limit.

One thread, not the end of the world. So stop with the drama and whining, we aren't asking for much.

Like we said and have; we will wait.

[ByronicHero]

(Original post by blueray)
Tell me how can you have a 15 way pm conversation and reply to all 15 pms and vice versa, it is not lazyness it is common sense.
You talk like this because you have a sub forum.
Before, in order to have a party, you needed 15 members, we have that, now it's changed, we try to adapt, the reason is above.

We are not asking for a whole sub forum, just a thread, is that too much?

If this really bothers you as it clearly does, why can't the admins just remove the 30 second pm limit for our party members until we have our polices?

Making one thread...are we asking for the world, no.
You are making it seem like we are.

We have a party,we want a thread, it's simple.

You want polcies? We will give it to you once we all agree on our thread, or our pms from no 30 sec limit.

One thread, not the end of the world. So stop with the drama and whining, we aren't asking for much.

Like we said and have; we will wait.

1) Rofl.
2) I have told you how you can orchestrate the formation of basic policy. If it is too difficult for you then that is your problem and not ours.
3) You have a thread: this thread.
4) They can't simply remove the limit for several members because of the way the site is written, nor would they even if they could. Claiming a 30 second wait as a reason is hilarious. Nobody except you thinks it is a legitimate reason.
5) You do not have a party. You have the idea for a party. Simple.
6) If you don't then I doubt your party will be formed and it will be on your head and nobody elses. Frankly, if I were one of the people wanting to join the party I would ignore you and make this happen myself and I would suggest to any of them reading that this may be what they wish to do because you are not progressing your cause at all.
7) You are telling us to stop whining? You are actually hilarious.

You will be waiting a long time. Nobody wants a party formed the membership of which cannot - by the coming together of their collective brain power - do something as simple as provide the basic aims for that party. You are in absolutely no position to be making demands of us as members of the HOC and certainly in no position to think you can make demands of the admin which is, again hilariously, what you suggest in your post.

[blueray]

(Original post by paddy__power)
1) Rofl.
2) I have told you how you can orchestrate the formation of basic policy. If it is too difficult for you then that is your problem and not ours.
3) You have a thread: this thread.
4) They can't simply remove the limit for several members because of the way the site is written, nor would they even if they could. Claiming a 30 second wait as a reason is hilarious. Nobody except you thinks it is a legitimate reason.
5) You do not have a party. You have the idea for a party. Simple.
6) If you don't then I doubt your party will be formed and it will be on your head and nobody elses. Frankly, if I were one of the people wanting to join the party I would ignore you and make this happen myself and I would suggest to any of them reading that this may be what they wish to do because you are not progressing your cause at all.
7) You are telling us to stop whining? You are actually hilarious.

You will be waiting a long time. Nobody wants a party formed the membership of which cannot - by the coming together of their collective brain power - do something as simple as provide the basic aims for that party. You are in absolutely no position to be making demands of us as members of the HOC and certainly in no position to think you can make demands of the admin which is, again hilariously, what you suggest in your post.

You know what I will just make a new thread, purely on polices However I have asked the admins, that no one will be able to comment on it apart from the tsr green party, if you do then warnings etc will be brought fourth.

[ByronicHero]

(Original post by blueray)
You know what I will just make a new thread, purely on polices However I have asked the admins, that no one will be able to comment on it apart from the tsr green party, if you do then warnings etc will be brought fourth.

You can make the thread and you can ask in said thread that only X or Y person(s) be able to post on it if you wish; you can even threaten warnings and claim to have "asked" the admin. Unfortunately, your delusions of power aside, this is all irrelevant. Unless somebody breaks site rules they will not be warned and nothing will be removed from the thread. Stop acting like such a child and pretending you have anything even approaching a reasonable platform from which to tell any of us what we can or cannot do. You don't, nor will you ever.

Make your policy, then show it to us and then people can voice how they feel about the creation of the party. Hopefully you end up forming and providing something interesting for the house but fair warning that if you do and you come with the attitude you are showing in this thread you will get nowhere. All that will happen is people will mercilessly pull apart every piece of legislation you try to submit simply because they think you are a tool. Then eventually your party will become annoyed that this is the case (because nobody comes here to be constantly destroyed) and they will look for someone to blame. They will blame you and you remember my friendly warning. I, along (I hope) with most other people here want this place to be somewhere that people can learn things in a friendly environment. You are not the first person who seems like you would act counter to that and you will not be the last but there is a reason none of those people really stick around very long and that's because eventually they realise that nobody values anything they say.

[toronto353]

(Original post by blueray)
You know what I will just make a new thread, purely on polices However I have asked the admins, that no one will be able to comment on it apart from the tsr green party, if you do then warnings etc will be brought fourth.

Lies. The admins wouldn't do that. You can't have a thread just for your party where no-one else can comment. It isn't possible on this site because you can exclude people posting in this forum.

(Original post by blueray)
Tell me how can you have a 15 way pm conversation and reply to all 15 pms and vice versa, it is not lazyness it is common sense.
You talk like this because you have a sub forum.
Before, in order to have a party, you needed 15 members, we have that, now it's changed, we try to adapt, the reason is above.

We are not asking for a whole sub forum, just a thread, is that too much?

If this really bothers you as it clearly does, why can't the admins just remove the 30 second pm limit for our party members until we have our polices?

Making one thread...are we asking for the world, no.
You are making it seem like we are.

We have a party,we want a thread, it's simple.

You want polcies? We will give it to you once we all agree on our thread, or our pms from no 30 sec limit.

One thread, not the end of the world. So stop with the drama and whining, we aren't asking for much.

Like we said and have; we will wait.

No you don't. Why don't you say to one person 'come up with our temporary defence policy and then PM me so that I can put it in the OP'. You don't. You're acting like an idiot now and while you continue to do so, I will treat you as such. You are asking for this entire site to be rewritten for you. Well apologies if the mods don't do that. It's not difficult to get your policies together, your whining is making it difficult. No other member of this party posts on here apart from you and hasn't done in the past four days and you don't post here apart from in this thread. Though I have no say in the matter, I certainly wouldn't recommend this party to form because you're not getting involved.

Stop whining, get on with sorting out your policies or shut up.

[blueray]

(Original post by paddy__power)
You can make the thread and you can ask in said thread that only X or Y person(s) be able to post on it if you wish; you can even threaten warnings and claim to have "asked" the admin. Unfortunately, your delusions of power aside, this is all irrelevant. Unless somebody breaks site rules they will not be warned and nothing will be removed from the thread. Stop acting like such a child and pretending you have anything even approaching a reasonable platform from which to tell any of us what we can or cannot do. You don't, nor will you ever.

Make your policy, then show it to us and then people can voice how they feel about the creation of the party. Hopefully you end up forming and providing something interesting for the house but fair warning that if you do and you come with the attitude you are showing in this thread you will get nowhere. All that will happen is people will mercilessly pull apart every piece of legislation you try to submit simply because they think you are a tool. Then eventually your party will become annoyed that this is the case (because nobody comes here to be constantly destroyed) and they will look for someone to blame. They will blame you and you remember my friendly warning. I, along (I hope) with most other people here want this place to be somewhere that people can learn things in a friendly environment. You are not the first person who seems like you would act counter to that and you will not be the last but there is a reason none of those people really stick around very long and that's because eventually they realise that nobody values anything they say.

I will take your advice on board, thanks.

(Original post by toronto353)
Lies. The admins wouldn't do that. You can't have a thread just for your party where no-one else can comment. It isn't possible on this site because you can exclude people posting in this forum.

No you don't. Why don't you say to one person 'come up with our temporary defence policy and then PM me so that I can put it in the OP'. You don't. You're acting like an idiot now and while you continue to do so, I will treat you as such. You are asking for this entire site to be rewritten for you. Well apologies if the mods don't do that. It's not difficult to get your policies together, your whining is making it difficult. No other member of this party posts on here apart from you and hasn't done in the past four days and you don't post here apart from in this thread. Though I have no say in the matter, I certainly wouldn't recommend this party to form because you're not getting involved.

Stop whining, get on with sorting out your policies or shut up.

You know your brazen attitude is winning you no "cool" points on the internet, stop trying to act tough.

[ByronicHero]

(Original post by blueray)
I will take your advice on board, thanks.



You know your brazen attitude is winning you no "cool" points on the internet, stop trying to act tough.

No problem.

Good luck.

[toronto353]

(Original post by blueray)
You know your brazen attitude is winning you no "cool" points on the internet, stop trying to act tough.

I've tried playing nice, but it doesn't work. So I'm giving you honest advice as bluntly as possible.

[blueray]

(Original post by paddy__power)
No problem.

Good luck.

Cheers

(Original post by toronto353)
I've tried playing nice, but it doesn't work. So I'm giving you honest advice as bluntly as possible.

Whatever, please stop arguing, it gets us no where. Thank you.

[toronto353]

(Original post by blueray)
Whatever, please stop arguing, it gets us no where. Thank you.

Sure, but in future, if you've got something to say, quote me. I'm not saying any of this to be mean, but to help you.

[internetguru]

Where are you guys don't tell me I'm going to have to go on a new recruitment drive to find replacements?

[Myotherone]

Hello sorry I've been away bring me up to scratch

[internetguru]

(Original post by Myotherone)
Hello sorry I've been away bring me up to scratch

It seems blueray decided he couldn't be active enough to potentially lead the potential party so he tried to end the potential party formation. I am taking it upon myself to make sure all potential members can become active so that the chance to form a party is not lost.

[internetguru]

(Original post by ak137)
.

(Original post by TheHansa)
.

(Original post by Orange'94)
.

(Original post by Miracle Day )
.

(Original post by Multiplexing-gamer)
.

(Original post by Jwf13)
.

(Original post by Bixel )
.

(Original post by EnviroProtector)
.

(Original post by Skittle123)
.

(Original post by Usycool1)
.

(Original post by JamesNeedHelp2)
.

(Original post by Oldmantax)
.

Hey guys blueray has bailed get back on MHoC and stay active as one of you will probably become leader if the party forms.

[Abiraleft]

(Original post by internetguru)
Hey guys blueray has bailed get back on MHoC and stay active as one of you will probably become leader if the party forms.

How has blueray bailed?