B469 - Banking Bill 2012

TSR's model parliament.

Announcements Posted on
Sign in to Reply
  1. RoryS's Avatar
    • Community Assistant
    • Deputy Secretary General of the Model UN
    • Location: South London
    • Posts: 2,741
    Re: B469 - Banking Bill 2012
    (Original post by JPKC)
    Fair enough. Here are some good things the Bill would do:
    • Reduce national income tax for those earning below £20,000 to 0%.
    • Cut taxes for small/medium businesses by 50%.
    • Reduce the nation's deficit without harmful cuts to public services.
    • It does this by raising an FTT - a 0.01% tax on the price of a trade on the capital market.


    The FTT is good because it's progressive: it's a tax that only a very small group of people will be affected by. It's also very small itself - 5x smaller than a Robin Hood Tax (see the video in the Notes). It also will have a minimal impact on the UK as a financial centre, because the Bill massively doubles deposit insurance - something financial institutions will very much like. And that doesn't even factor in the other points that make the UK competitive in finance.

    Overall a good bill for those that think the financial sector should pay a bit more to help the rest of the economy out. This Bill cuts taxes for the 99%.


    This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad App
    Thanks for the advice. I'll take it on board when casting my vote in the lobby.
  2. jesusandtequila's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 3,188
    Re: B469 - Banking Bill 2012
    I'm not convinced that this will do anything to make the banking system more stable. I think the stability fund makes itself a self-fulfilling prophecy and the FTT will be hugely damaging. It's all the same problems (mostly missing the point) that I went through in the first original reading.
  3. Ysolt's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Location: Enfield
    • Posts: 288
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: B469 - Banking Bill 2012
    I agree with a financial transactions tax for the banks and tax cuts for everyone else so this bill gets my thumbs up :yy:
  4. MacDaddi's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: Location, Location
    • Posts: 3,475
    Re: B469 - Banking Bill 2012
    Yes probably if it didnt have the FTT, but it does so its a Nay
  5. DynamicSyngery's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 1,011
    Re: B469 - Banking Bill 2012
    (Original post by JPKC)
    The FTT is good because it's progressive: it's a tax that only a very small group of people will be affected by.
    It's just another corporation tax, to be paid by anyone with a bank account or a pension, or indirectly by anyone who does business with a company that has a bank account or a pension fund.

    It's also very small itself - 5x smaller than a Robin Hood Tax (see the video in the Notes).
    It's like saying that charging you £1 for each step you take on the pavement is only a small tax on walking.

    It also will have a minimal impact on the UK as a financial centre, because the Bill massively doubles deposit insurance - something financial institutions will very much like.
    Deposit insurance is payable to account holders not to banks. It only takes any effect after the bank has gone into liquidation.
  6. Democracy's Avatar
    • Section Leader
    • Isn't it a pity, now isn't it a shame?
    Re: B469 - Banking Bill 2012
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.