A Summer of Maths

Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  • View Poll Results: Have you studied any Group Theory already?
    Yes, I did some Group Theory during/at my A-level.
    24 34.78%
    No, but I plan to study some before Uni.
    15 21.74%
    No, I haven't.
    30 43.48%

  1. DamoclesAustria's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 90
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Rahul.S)
    thanks for the stuff. Ive done little IMO stuff before, but some of the questions do seem interesting. Would you recommend getting the books?
    Which books?

    I recommend Titu Andreescu's "Problems from the Book". (There is a draft version online)
    I met Titu at the IMO last year and had my copy signed
  2. Rahul.S's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: GREENGATE
    • Posts: 3,496
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by DamoclesAustria)
    Which books?

    I recommend Titu Andreescu's "Problems from the Book". (There is a draft version online)
    I met Titu at the IMO last year and had my copy signed
    http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/index.php?mode=books this stuff?

    Titu sounds jokes guessing Romanian? do you do the IMO last year?
  3. TheMagicMan's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,940
    (Original post by Rahul.S)
    is this IMO stuff any good for uni shizz?
    None of the material is useful. The two main things you get out of training from the IMO are problem solving skills and a forced early introduction to 'advanced' maths.... I wouldn't have done half the Uni maths I have if I hadn't been dragged through the AMS for four years


    This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad App
  4. Tobedotty's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 909
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by TheMagicMan)
    None of the material is useful. The two main things you get out of training from the IMO are problem solving skills and a forced early introduction to 'advanced' maths.... I wouldn't have done half the Uni maths I have if I hadn't been dragged through the AMS for four years


    This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad App
    Did you want to do the AMS? And are you glad that you did?
  5. Rahul.S's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: GREENGATE
    • Posts: 3,496
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by TheMagicMan)
    None of the material is useful. The two main things you get out of training from the IMO are problem solving skills and a forced early introduction to 'advanced' maths.... I wouldn't have done half the Uni maths I have if I hadn't been dragged through the AMS for four years


    This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad App
    ah I see. I might still just look at some questions- I get little time nowadays to do much- and there are IMO questions which I can dive into without actually reading any new material my mate was telling me there are quite alot of Trinity 2012 applicants in the IMO team- they must of raised the STEP boundary
  6. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Rahul.S)
    http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/index.php?mode=books this stuff?

    Titu sounds jokes guessing Romanian? do you do the IMO last year?
    I don't know how it sounds, but this guy's team was the first to obtain a perfect score in the IMO.
  7. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by DamoclesAustria)
    Does anybody want to post their solutions to any pending problems?

    Here's a new one:
    Let p_k(x)=1+x+\ldots+x^{k-1}. Given that gcd(k,n)=1, show that p_k(x) divides p_k(x^n).
    Spoiler:
    Show

    I would bash it quickly before dinner.

    \displaystyle p_k(x) = \frac{1 - x^k}{1 - x} and \displaystyle p_k(x^n) = \frac{1 - x^{kn}}{1 - x^n}

    Hence,

    \displaystyle \frac{p_k(x^n)}{p_k(x)} = \frac{(1 - x^{kn})(1 - x)}{(1 - x^n)(1 - x^k)}

    and, considering subgroups, on top we have C_{kn} with C_1, and on the bottom subgroups C_n \cap C_k = C_1, where C_{nk} the group of kn-th roots of unity.
  8. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Lord of the Flies)
    I fixed what I had overlooked with the fct. eq. and now have a flawless proof/solution (or so it seems)
    Didn't have time for it; being busy all day. Will have a look at it again tonight.

    (Original post by ben-smith)
    Where do you think the quote in my sig comes from?
    Well, I didn't know people had signatures -- they are rather hidden.
  9. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    I think Groups will be more interesting than Analysis?
  10. Tobedotty's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 909
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    I think Groups will be more interesting than Analysis?
    I agree
  11. DamoclesAustria's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 90
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    I think Groups will be more interesting than Analysis?
    Groups are interesting as well but I don't have as many exercises to share...

    Here's one:
    Let G be a group. The conjugation c:G\to G of an element x with y is c_y(x)=yxy^{-1}, where  x,y\in G. (Show that c is a group homomorphism.)

    Define the function t: G\to Aut(G) that maps an element of G to the conjugation with this element, so y\mapsto c_y. Show that t is also a group homomorphism.
  12. Dog4444's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 968
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by DamoclesAustria)
    ...
    Is it true that a lot of IMO-level/type problems (and olympiad problems in general) can be solved easily by advanced (undergrad and beyond) maths?
  13. Rahul.S's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: GREENGATE
    • Posts: 3,496
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    I don't know how it sounds, but this guy's team was the first to obtain a perfect score in the IMO.
    is that a big ting? because thats the first im hearing of it
  14. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by DamoclesAustria)
    Groups are interesting as well but I don't have as many exercises to share...
    I have a lot of exercises, but we have to get started from somewhere; i.e. conjugation and group homomorphisms is quite a jump.

    Does everyone know what a group is? Can we get some axioms and examples?
  15. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Rahul.S)
    is that a big ting? because thats the first im hearing of it
    Well, unless this year there is a team with a perfect score, it will be also the only one.
  16. Rahul.S's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: GREENGATE
    • Posts: 3,496
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    Well, unless this year there is a team with a perfect score, it will be also the only one.
    guess that is sik?! I dont even know a lot about IMO etc. :lol:
  17. DamoclesAustria's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 90
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Dog4444)
    Is it true that a lot of IMO-level/type problems (and olympiad problems in general) can be solved easily by advanced (undergrad and beyond) maths?
    No, definitely not. Even if you disregard elementary geometry, hard olmypiad problems require a lot of experience and training both of which you don't get simply by studying university maths.
  18. DamoclesAustria's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 90
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    I have a lot of exercises, but we have to get started from somewhere; i.e. conjugation and group homomorphisms is quite a jump.

    Does everyone know what a group is? Can we get some axioms and examples?
    So you suggest that we all do the same stuff at the same time? That won't work.

    Anyway, here's a playlist of a course on group theory (on youtube).

    The first chapter here gives an introduction to groups as well.
  19. TheMagicMan's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,940
    (Original post by Tobedotty)
    Did you want to do the AMS? And are you glad that you did?
    I had no clue what it was...I was a little kid when I was asked to do it so I wasn't going to say no

    The unfortunate thing was was that by the time I was mature enough (I wasn't nearlytalented enough to be challenging for the IMO as an early teen like a Tao) to challenge for the IMO team I was completely jaded with that kind of maths


    This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad App
  20. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    Question:

    Let f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} be a function satisfying \displaystyle f\left(\frac{x_1 + x_2}{2}\right) = \frac{f(x_1) + f(x_2)}{2} for any x_1, x_2.

    Prove that

    \displaystyle f\left(\frac{x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_n}{n}\right) = \frac{f(x_1) + f(x_2) + \cdots + f(x_n)}{n}

    for any x_1, x_2, ..., x_n.
    Solution:

    Spoiler:
    Show

    Notice that the case n = 2 is contained in the hypothesis.


    Lets assume n = 2^k, and we show, by induction on k, that n = 2^{k+1} must be true.


    \displaystyle f\left(\frac{x_1 + \cdots x_{2^k} + x_{2^k + 1} + \cdots + x_{2^{k+1}}}{2^{k+1}}\right)\ =\ \frac{\displaystyle f\left(\frac{x_1 + \cdots + x_{2^k}}{2^k}\right) + f\left(\frac{x_{2^k + 1} + \cdots + x_{2^{k+1}}}{2^k}\right)}{2}


    \displaystyle \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ =\ \frac{\displaystyle \frac{f(x_1) + \cdots + f(x_{2^k})}{2^k} + \frac{f(x_{2^k + 1}) + \cdots + f(x_{2^{k+1}})}{2^k}}{2}


    \displaystyle \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ =\ \frac{f(x_1) + \cdots + f(x_{2^k}) + f(x_{2^k + 1}) + \cdots + f(x_{2^{k+1}})}{2^{k+1}}



    Now, we show that if true for n, then it is true for n - 1.

    Consider x_1, x_2, ..., x_{n-1} and \displaystyle x_n = \frac{x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_{n-1}}{n-1}, then by hypothesis we obtain


    \displaystyle f\left(\frac{x_1 + \cdots + x_{n-1} + \frac{x_1 + \cdots + x_{n-1}}{n-1}}{n}\right) = \frac{f(x_1) + \cdots + f(x_{n-1}) + f\left(\frac{x_1 + \cdots + x_{n-1}}{n-1}\right)}{n}

    which is the same as

    \displaystyle f\left(\frac{x_1 + \cdots + x_{n-1}}{n - 1} \right) = \frac{f(x_1) + \cdots + f(x_{n-1})}{n} + \frac{1}{n} f\left(\frac{x_1 + \cdots + x_{n-1}}{n-1} \right)

    and it is easily rearranged to

    \displaystyle f\left( \frac{x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_{n-1}}{n-1} \right) = \frac{f(x_1) + f(x_2) + \cdots + f(x_{n-1})}{n-1}

    and the proof is complete.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.