A Summer of Maths

Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  • View Poll Results: Have you studied any Group Theory already?
    Yes, I did some Group Theory during/at my A-level.
    24 34.78%
    No, but I plan to study some before Uni.
    15 21.74%
    No, I haven't.
    30 43.48%

  1. Brit_Miller's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Location: Bristol
    • Posts: 684
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by electriic_ink)
    Let z=y'.

    Also quite easy: How many (real) solutions does (x + 101)^{16} + x^2 = 0 have? Knowledge required: GCSE & below.
    Thanks

    (and none surely?)
  2. electriic_ink's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 5,636
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Brit_Miller)
    Thanks

    (and none surely?)
    Yeah
  3. DJMayes's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,563
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by 4ever_drifting)
    Love these kind of problems Just a note though - could you not observe that you need the product of the roots of the quadratic equation, which is given by c/a in 0=ax^2+bx+c, so you know the answer is 26 without having to find the roots then multiply them together?
    You could in this case because the quadratic simultaneous equations you get when substituting for X and when substituting for Y are the same. I preferred not to take that shortcut on the off-chance that substituting for Y generated a different quadratic than substituting for X.

    I think you could probably solve it geometrically as well, the method I posted was just the one I prefer to use.
  4. Intriguing Alias's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: Yorkshire
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by DJMayes)
    At the Nottingham University Open Day there was a "Maths Trail" with several interesting questions on it. The questions ranged from requiring a working knowledge of arithmetic progressions and combinations to lowest common multiples and counting squares; and more emphasis was put on thinking about them than slogging through endless manipulation. I thought I'd share one with you. The question is of the kind that could be set in C1, but is an interesting one:

    A rectangle is inscribed inside a circle of radius 6 units such that each of the vertices of the rectangle lie on the circumference of the circle. Given that the perimeter of the rectangle is 28 units, what is the area?

    Required Knowledge:
    Spoiler:
    Show

    - Pythagoras' Theorem
    - Simultaneous Quadratic Equations


    Hints:
    Spoiler:
    Show

    What information are you given? You have both the perimeter of the rectangle, and the radius of the circle it is inscribed inside. How can you relate these in terms of the length and width of the rectangle?
    Spoiler:
    Show

    Consider the diagonal of the rectangle



    Full Solution:
    Spoiler:
    Show

    Let X and Y represent the length and width of the rectangle. Using this and the perimeter we can automatically deduce an equation:

    2X + 2Y = 28

    Which simplifies to X + Y = 14

    As we are told that the radius of the circle is 6, we also know that its diameter must be 12. This diameter forms the diagonal of the rectangle. From this, another equation can be deduced using Pythagoras' Theorem:

    X^2 + Y^2 = 144

    We now have a set of simultaneous equations to solve. Re-arranging the first to leave Y in terms of X and substituting in the second equation leaves you with this:

    X^2 + (14 - X)^2 = 144

    This expands to:

    X^2 + X^2 - 28X + 196 = 144

    Which then simplifies to:

    2X^2 - 28X + 52 = 0

    or:

    X^2 - 14X + 26 = 0

    You can then complete the square or use the quadratic formula to get the result:

    X = 7 + rt(23) or X = 7 - rt(23)

    Using this you can then confirm that Y has the same values (i.e. if X = 7 + rt(23) then Y = 7 + rt(23) and vice-versa)

    Now you know both side lengths, you simply multiply them together to get the area. The final answer is 26.
    Spoiler:
    Show
    This could be made a lot neater. Starting as you did, x + y = 14, and x^2 + y^2 = 144. Now see that (x+y)^2 = x^2 + y^2 + 2xy and so area = xy = 0.5(196 - 144) = 26
  5. DJMayes's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,563
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by hassi94)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    This could be made a lot neater. Starting as you did, x + y = 14, and x^2 + y^2 = 144. Now see that (x+y)^2 = x^2 + y^2 + 2xy and so area = xy = 0.5(196 - 144) = 26
    Spoiler:
    Show
    That's a very clever trick for doing it actually! Unfortunately I have an insistence on solving all simultaneous equations (Even linear ones) through substitution instead of subtraction or manipulation which prevents me from spotting things like this
  6. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    This one is a bit tricky, but I think it has something to teach; use hints if you get stuck.

    {*} Question:

    Let f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}\setminus \{3\} be a function with the property that there exists \omega > 0 such that

    \displaystyle f(x + \omega) = \frac{f(x) - 5}{f(x) - 3}

    for all x \in \mathbb{R}.

    Prove that f is periodic.



    {**} Required: (A-level)

    Spoiler:
    Show

    A function is periodic, with period p, if for every x in its domain one has f(x) \equiv f(x + n p) where n is an integer.


    {***} Hints:

    Spoiler:
    Show

    (1)
    Spoiler:
    Show

    What about f(x) = 2?


    (2)
    Spoiler:
    Show

    How does f(x + 2\omega) look like?

  7. Rahul.S's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: GREENGATE
    • Posts: 3,496
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by hassi94)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    This could be made a lot neater. Starting as you did, x + y = 14, and x^2 + y^2 = 144. Now see that (x+y)^2 = x^2 + y^2 + 2xy and so area = xy = 0.5(196 - 144) = 26
    wasnt this in the online lecture thing?
  8. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by james22)
    What is the derivative of y=x^x?

    What is the derivatie and inverse of y=x^x^x^x^... (an infinite string of x's)

    Here x^x^x=x^(x^x) not (x^x)^x

    Also for what values of x does y exist?
    Some thoughts under cruel assumptions.

    Spoiler:
    Show

    Without any justification, I claim that \displaystyle y = x^y.

    Maybe the inverse will be x = y^{y^{-1}}


    Now, note that \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} = y \frac{d}{dx}\left[ \ln(y) \right], and hence,

    \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} = x^y \left[\frac{dy}{dx}\ln(x) + \frac{y}{x} \right]

    which gives as a final result

    \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{y x^{y-1}}{1 - x^{y}\ln(x)}
  9. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    I wonder how people on here find Analysis in general.

    Do you like it (assuming you have seen some), or do you think it is difficult to understand and apply?
  10. Blutooth's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 1,943
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    This one is a bit tricky, but I think it has something to teach; use hints if you get stuck.

    {*} Question:

    Let f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}\setminus \{3\} be a function with the property that there exists \omega > 0 such that

    \displaystyle f(x + \omega) = \frac{f(x) - 5}{f(x) - 3}

    for all x \in \mathbb{R}.

    Prove that f is periodic.



    {**} Required: (A-level)

    Spoiler:
    Show

    A function is periodic, with period p, if for every x in its domain one has f(x) \equiv f(x + n p) where n is an integer.


    {***} Hints:

    Spoiler:
    Show

    (1)
    Spoiler:
    Show

    What about f(x) = 2?


    (2)
    Spoiler:
    Show

    How does f(x + 2\omega) look like?

    Didn't seem that hard.
    Spoiler:
    Show

    Let f(x)=F
    subbing x for x+w we obtain f(x+2w)=(2F-5)/(F-2)
    subbing x for x+w again we obtain f(x+3w)=(-3F+5)/(-F+1)
    subbing x for x+w again we obtain f(x+4w)=F=f(x)
    so clearly f(x)=f(x+4nw) for every n. Period is 4w.
    Thus we are done.
    Last edited by Blutooth; 03-07-2012 at 02:20.
  11. james22's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,980
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    Some thoughts under cruel assumptions.

    Spoiler:
    Show

    Without any justification, I claim that \displaystyle y = x^y.

    Maybe the inverse will be x = y^{y^{-1}}


    Now, note that \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} = y \frac{d}{dx}\left[ \ln(y) \right], and hence,

    \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} = x^y \left[\frac{dy}{dx}\ln(x) + \frac{y}{x} \right]

    which gives as a final result

    \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{y x^{y-1}}{1 - x^{y}\ln(x)}
    You have the right inverse and are right in the simplification of the original equation. I cannot remember the derivative but your answer looks about right. Any luck with the values of x for which this converges?
  12. Lord of the Flies's Avatar
    • The foul fiend Flibbertigibbet
    • Location: Paris, France
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    I wonder how people on here find Analysis in general.

    Do you like it (assuming you have seen some), or do you think it is difficult to understand and apply?
    I find analysis a bit boring to be honest. Perhaps because it is not my strong point by any means, I don't know. I prefer "even purer maths"... They seem to have more depth and involve more creativity.
  13. jack.hadamard's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 696
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Blutooth)
    ...
    Can you use a spoiler, please. Thanks.

    Spoiler:
    Show

    Can f(x) take the values 1 or 2?


    (Original post by james22)
    Any luck with the values of x for which this converges?
    I don't have a good reason to believe what I derived works, so I have only rough ideas.


    (Original post by Lord of the Flies)
    I find analysis a bit boring to be honest. I prefer "even purer maths"... They seem to have more depth and involve more creativity.
    I have studied a bit of it, and I find it interesting; some of Cauchy's stuff is amazing and I would say it is creative.
    However, I do get stuck from time to time -- I thought I understood uniform continuity two months ago, but now I have to read it again.
  14. Blutooth's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 1,943
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    Can you use a spoiler, please. Thanks.

    Spoiler:
    Show

    Can f(x) take the values 1 or 2?


    Spoiler:
    Show

    No, by considering the denominator of f(x+2w), f(x+3w) etc. orplugging f(x+w)=3 and working out the value of f(x).
    Last edited by Blutooth; 03-07-2012 at 02:11.
  15. Blutooth's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 1,943
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by jack.hadamard)
    {*} Question:

    The polynomial x^2 + 1 is irreducible over \mathbb{R}.

    i) By completing the square, show that x^4 + 1 is not irreducible over the set of real numbers.

    Hence, derive the Sophie Germain algebraic identity

    x^4 + 4y^4\ \equiv\ (x^2 + 2xy + 2y^2)(x^2 - 2xy + 2y^2)

    by starting from the left-hand side.


    ii) Evaluate \displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{4k}{4k^4 + 1}


    {**} Required:

    Spoiler:
    Show

    A polynomial is said to be irreducible over a set if it cannot be factored into polynomials with coefficients from the given set.

    As an example,

    x^2 - 2 \equiv (x - \sqrt{2})(x + \sqrt{2})

    is irreducible over the set of rational numbers denoted by \mathbb{Q}.

    Spoiler:
    Show

    

\text{i)} x^4+1=(x^2+1)^2-2x^2=

\newline ((x^2+1)-\sqrt{2}x)((x^2+1)^2+\sqrt{2}x) \text{ reduced as required.}

\newline x^4+4y^4=(x^2+2y^2)^2-4(xy)^2=((x^2+2y^2)-2xy)((x^2+2y^2)+2xy)

\newline 

\newline \text{ii) By the result above } 4k^4+1=(2k^2-2k+1)(2k^2+2k+1)

\newline \text{Also note, } (2k^2+2k+1)-(2k^2-2k+1)=4k, \text{ hence} 

\newline \displaystyle \frac{4k}{4k^4+1}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{(2k^2-2k+1)} + \displaystyle \frac{-1}{(2k^2+2k+1)}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2(k-\frac{1}{2})^2+\frac{1}{2}} - \displaystyle \frac{1}{2(k+\frac{1}{2})^2 + \frac{1}{2}}

\newline \Rightarrow \sum_{1}^{n}\frac{4k}{4k^4+1}= \sum_{1}^{n} \left (\displaystyle\frac{1}{2(k-\frac{1}{2})^2 + \frac{1}{2}}-\displaystyle\frac{1}{2(k+\frac{  1}{2})^2+\frac{1}{2}}  \right )=\frac{1}{2(\frac{1}{2})^2 + \frac{1}{2}}-\frac{1}{2(n+\frac{1}{2})^2 + \frac{1}{2}}=1-\frac{1}{2n^2+2n+1}=\frac{2n^2+2  n}{2n^2+2n+1}
  16. Lord of the Flies's Avatar
    • The foul fiend Flibbertigibbet
    • Location: Paris, France
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by james22)
    You have the right inverse and are right in the simplification of the original equation. I cannot remember the derivative but your answer looks about right. Any luck with the values of x for which this converges?
    Spoiler:
    Show

    Domain and convergence

    \bullet\;\;x<0 clearly both f^{-1} and f are undefined.

    \bullet\;\;0\leq x\leq 1\Rightarrow 0\leq f^{-1}\leq 1 and f^{-1} strictly increases \Rightarrow f strictly increases so f is injective for 0\leq x\leq 1

    \bullet\;\;x>1 \Rightarrow 1<f^{-1}\leq \sqrt[e]{e} and f^{-1} strictly increases for 1<x<\sqrt[e]{e} and strictly decreases for x>\sqrt[e]{e}.

    Also, \displaystyle \lim_{+\infty}f^{-1}=1. Therefore f is undefined for 1<x< \sqrt[e]{e} since it would return exactly two values.

    Additionally, since the maximum of f^{-1} occurs only for x=\sqrt[e]{e}\Rightarrow f^{-1}(x)=\sqrt[e]{e} has exactly one solution so f is injective for x=\sqrt[e]{e} and f is undefined for all x>\sqrt[e]{e}

    Therefore convergence occurs when 0\leq x\leq 1\; or \;x=\sqrt[e]{e}


    If that is what you meant by convergence?
    Last edited by Lord of the Flies; 03-07-2012 at 09:04.
  17. Lord of the Flies's Avatar
    • The foul fiend Flibbertigibbet
    • Location: Paris, France
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    Here's an easy one!

    Question

    Evaluate \displaystyle\lim_{x\to0}\frac{ \sin x^n}{\sin^n x}\quad (n>0)

    Required

    Spoiler:
    Show

    L'Hôpital's rule
    Last edited by Lord of the Flies; 03-07-2012 at 09:42.
  18. james22's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,980
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Lord of the Flies)
    Spoiler:
    Show

    Domain and convergence

    \bullet\;\;x<0 clearly both f^{-1} and f are undefined.

    \bullet\;\;0\leq x\leq 1\Rightarrow 0\leq f^{-1}\leq 1 and f^{-1} strictly increases \Rightarrow f strictly increases so f is injective for 0\leq x\leq 1

    \bullet\;\;x>1 \Rightarrow 1<f^{-1}\leq \sqrt[e]{e} and f^{-1} strictly increases for 1<x<\sqrt[e]{e} and strictly decreases for x>\sqrt[e]{e}.

    Also, \displaystyle \lim_{+\infty}f^{-1}=1. Therefore f is undefined for 1<x< \sqrt[e]{e} since it would return exactly two values.

    Additionally, since the maximum of f^{-1} occurs only for x=\sqrt[e]{e}\Rightarrow f^{-1}(x)=\sqrt[e]{e} has exactly one solution so f is injective for x=\sqrt[e]{e} and f is undefined for all x>\sqrt[e]{e}

    Therefore convergence occurs when 0\leq x\leq 1\; or \;x=\sqrt[e]{e}


    If that is what you meant by convergence?
    That is what I mean by convergence.

    You are almost right, but it converges for all 0<x<e^(1/e)
  19. Lord of the Flies's Avatar
    • The foul fiend Flibbertigibbet
    • Location: Paris, France
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by james22)
    That is what I mean by convergence.

    You are almost right, but it converges for all 0<x<e^(1/e)
    Really? I don't see how... When 1&lt;x&lt;e^{1/e},\;f(x) returns two values, no?
  20. Brit_Miller's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Location: Bristol
    • Posts: 684
    Re: A Summer of Maths
    (Original post by Lord of the Flies)
    Here's an easy one!

    Question

    Evaluate \displaystyle\lim_{x\to0}\frac{ \sin x^n}{\sin^n x}\quad (n&gt;0)

    Required

    Spoiler:
    Show

    L'Hôpital's rule
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Is it undefined? I make lim x->0 f'(x)/g'(x) 0/0, so obviously g'(x)=0
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.