(Original post by Perseveranze)
No he didn't, show me which person he executed that "choked him"?
Narrated 'Aisha: "Whenever Allah's Apostle was given the choice of one of two matters, he would choose the easier of the two, as long as it was not sinful to do so, but if it was sinful to do so, he would not approach it. Allah's Apostle never took revenge (over anybody) for his own sake but (he did) only when Allah's Legal Bindings were outraged in which case he would take revenge for Allah's Sake. (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Virtues and Merits of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and his Companions, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 760)"
Preaching was his mission. There's not a single prophet, that logically or rationally, would "keep his preaching to himself", when his purpose is to tell people about the One true God, and warn them of a hell fire.
I'm sure, you personally, would be preaching all day long, if you knew your family, friends, the same people around you, who consider you as "the truth worthy" and the "truthful" (obviously I doubt even your own kin consider you those two), would all end up in the hellfire, unless you warn them and help save them from it.
They tried to assassinate him for preaching, he only attacked people who attacked his followers through persecutions and killings.
And once he conquered Mecca, he forgave all of them (except for 4 people who had done seriously unforgivable crimes).
Yet, anyone with any sense of objectivity can see how weak your presented arguments are, especially when its based on lies.
You're not just a hypocrite (because of how much in denial you are about Christianity), you're also an Islamaphobe, that would lie and twist at every opportunity he gets.
Right, defending yourself against persecution, and preaching truth (as you're a prophet), is 10x worst than this man?
The greatest crime, the greatest ‘sin’ of Mohammad in the eyes of the Christian West is that he did not allow himself to be slaughtered, to be ‘crucified’ by his enemies. He only defended himself, his family and his followers; and finally vanquished his enemies. Mohammad’s success is the Christians’ gall of disappointment: He did not believe in any vicarious sacrifices for the sins of others. [Edward Gibbon]
You, or anyone you know or have ever read about, couldn't achieve half of what Muhammad(pbuh) did when he completely flipped the Arabian peninsula over.
For a fourth time, I said, I do not support people taking the law into their own hands.
You keep ignoring this, like you cannot comprehend basic English sentences.
And this man didn't "preach", he insulted. In the western context of the word, the Pagans would've found any debate they got into as insulting, this incident is much different to that.
For the pagans, "Monotheistic preaching" was offensive. And he got persecuted, tortured and many of his followers killed for it. This man on the other hand, straight up insulted, despite being asked not to, he kept pushing people's buttons and so he got a reaction for it.
The Prophet(pbuh) preached, and he got a reaction too. Both were expected, because if you push someone's button again and again, they're going to react. The fact of the matter is, in both cases it's wrong to attack the person.