Is dubstep dead?
Music, albums, singles, gigs, bands, artists and anything else musical you can think of.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera | 20-05-2013 | |
-
Re: Is dubstep dead?
It's not dead, it has just changed. The dubstep purists will insist it is dead, but they have very strict definitions of what dubstep is, I disagree. I think brostep has made a massive impact on the whole scene, but it's not the only fusion genre and there is a lot more to explore, and there are still good artists out there. If you define dubstep as the sounds of early producers then yes, it hasppeaked and it is dying. If you define it more loosely, then it's getting huge.
-
Re: Is dubstep dead?Post-dubstep can die(Original post by Mo-Amin)
Dubstep's still about, and it's evolving. See: 'post-dubstep'.
I know genre labels are getting ridiculous but I think it's fair to say there is a movement of artists who's work has been influenced by the UK dubstep scene.
-
Re: Is dubstep dead?
I think Dubstep that doesn't really try and be outrageously bass-y etc, will never die, because it's really just an extension of house and is definitely good raver-esque music. See stuff like Knife Party and Nero and even some SHM etc. Brostep (i.e, Skrillex) is pretty unsustainable and isn't (imo) fun to listen to in clubs.