Afghanistan declared 'Major US ally'

The United States has given Afghanistan the status of "major non-Nato ally".

The designation, which includes countries such as Australia, Egypt and Israel, gives preferential access to US arms exports and defence co-operation.

The announcement was made by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on an unannounced visit to Afghanistan.

It comes ahead of a major donors' conference in Japan, which is due to discuss aid to Kabul after most Nato-led troops leave the country in 2014.

Participants at Sunday's meeting in Tokyo are expected to commit almost $4bn (£2.6bn) in annual development assistance to Afghanistan.

The country's central bank says it needs more than $4bn in aid each year, on top of $4bn for security forces.

A senior British official described the task of raising that money at the Tokyo conference as an unprecedented challenge,

Afghanistan is seeking firm commitments, but donors at Tokyo's meeting are also seen as likely to demand guarantees from Kabul on good governance and transparency.
Pullout fears

Ms Clinton said after talks with President Hamid Karzai that awarding Afghanistan the new status was a "powerful symbol of our commitment to Afghanistan's future".
Continue reading the main story
Analysis
image of David Loyn David Loyn BBC News, Kabul

By the time international combat operations end in 2014, the Afghan armed forces will mostly have US-designed rifles and Humvee all-terrain vehicles, as well as better armoured light combat vehicles, replacing Soviet-era equipment.

And Soviet-era T55 and T62 tanks are being replaced by the M60 Patton tank, used extensively by other US allies, such as Turkey, Israel and Egypt - not the bigger Leopard Tanks the Afghan government wanted.

Air support will continue to be provided by Russian-made helicopters, and the Nato fast jets that drop precision-guided bombs will not be replaced.

The cost of these forces, more than $4bn a year, will continue to be met by foreign donors for many years to come.

Questions remain about the ability of the new Afghan forces because of poor literacy, drug addiction and the continued threat of infiltration by the Taliban.

She added: "We are not even imagining abandoning Afghanistan."

The change, which comes into effect immediately, makes it easier for Kabul to purchase US military equipment and simplifies arms export procedures.

However, it will be many years before Afghanistan is in a position to buy weapons for itself, relying as it does on foreign support, the BBC's David Loyn in Kabul reports.

The last country to be granted major non-Nato ally status was Pakistan in 2004.

Nato leaders meeting in Chicago in May endorsed plans to hand over combat command to Afghan forces by mid-2013. After the full Nato withdrawal in 2014, only training units will remain.

At the Chicago meeting, US President Barack Obama issued a pledge that Washington would not abandon Afghanistan.

Earlier in May, Mr Obama and Mr Karzai signed a 10-year strategic partnership agreement outlining military and civil ties between the countries after 2014.

There are fears that the pullout could lead to Afghanistan sliding back into chaos, destroy its fragile economic recovery and reduce international donors' willingness to provide aid.

Taliban and other insurgents have stepped up attacks in recent months.

The US has been Afghanistan's Ally for years, back when they were good buddies with the Mujahid.

The US has been Afghanistan's Ally for years, back when they were good buddies with the Mujahid.

So that's why Mohammed Omar and his friends - good buddies of the U.S. according to you - refused to extradite Bin Laden to Washington when their good buddies - the U.S. - were attacked on 9/11! Good buddies my arse.

"Major ally" euphemism for they are willing to buy a **** load of american made weaponry.

Lol, the US government don't care about 9/11 or terrorist attacks. They were, and are, the Perfect vice.

That wasn't my point. Read the post again.

Fine, buddies was the wrong word. But these people only exist(ed) because the US supported them with the fanatical opposition to the USSR. I don't see why the US was so anti-communism really, despite the fact they were a threat to (in the US eyes) stability in the middle east, they were essentially a competitor to the highest form of the US system, Imperialist Capitalism, compeition on a corporatist level is a central feature.

You should know it best Stalin, Lenin described it so.

A necessary step in order to ensure the Afghani government can protect and safeguard its citizens' newly acquired rights from Islamic terrorists.

So the Mujahideen, and what became the Northern Alliance and Taliban, was not supported by the US with weapons, logistical tactics and CIA/Private contractor training?

The US has been Afghanistan's Ally for years, back when they were good buddies with the Mujahid.