[Above.The.Empyrean]

(Original post by MangoFreak)
It's less arguing and more making fun of Dalek

I bloody concur.

[raheem94]

(Original post by MangoFreak)
It's less arguing and more making fun of Dalek

Agreed!

[Dalek1099]

(Original post by raheem94)
Can you explain it in more detail i still don't understand how it will help physicists?

Have you considered releasing specimen papers for SY1/SY2?

I don't know the full applications of Number Fissioning but it will help physicists,for example if they were splitting a uranium atom work out how much volume of different substances there would be from the amount inside the atom,it will obviously have greater volume when split because of a lower density.I'm working on the papers but I'm way off completing them, unfortunately and hopefully,I will release a paper for ASY as well,which is the applications paper and SY1 and 2 can be took instead of C3 and C4 or as part of AS Symbolic Math along with ASY.

[FrescoDiMorte]

Am I going crazy or are you actually trying to invent/change maths ? Because your gonna confuse alot of people. I mean I just spent about 30mins trying to make sense of your 5x=5x+14 question ?

[L'Evil Fish]

*sigh*

[MangoFreak]

(Original post by FrescoDiMorte)
Am I going crazy or are you actually trying to invent/change maths ? Because your gonna confuse alot of people. I mean I just spent about 30mins trying to make sense of your 5x=5x+14 question ?

Don't bother, he's effectively the character in your profile picture but stupid.

[Zuzuzu]

(Original post by FrescoDiMorte)
Am I going crazy or are you actually trying to invent/change maths ? Because your gonna confuse alot of people. I mean I just spent about 30mins trying to make sense of your 5x=5x+14 question ?

As far as I can tell, it's meant to be 50 + x = 5x + 14

[FrescoDiMorte]

(Original post by Zuzuzu)
As far as I can tell, it's meant to be 50 + x = 5x + 14

Im not even trying to make any sense of it Thread Starter said hes trying to invent a new form of maths.

[Tullia]

(Original post by Zuzuzu)
As far as I can tell, it's meant to be 50 + x = 5x + 14

X=9

(5 X 9) +14=59

This is what he suggested.

If you take x to be 9, then it would make it 59 = (5 x 9) + 14. Both sides would equal 59.

[LithiumSalts]

(Original post by Dalek1099)
You are thinking of 44,non-laterally where really 44 laterally is 16,with 4 lots of 4 apples being equivalent to 16 apples.Its a tough new concept to accept.

No. No! Just no! This is offending my very eyeballs! You cannot use such crap to prove crap! While it may be accepted that you can write 4*4 as 44, fourty four does not equal sixteen. I write it in full words so it may pass the part of your brain that prevents you from expressing yourself in a way the rest of us can comprehend. Please go away and play with your barbies. As someone who studies A level Maths and Physics and has a best friend who studies A level Further Maths, you are putting my vodka-induced idiotic proofs to shame
Now shoo little child.

This was posted from The Student Room's Android App on my GT-S5830

[Dalek1099]

(Original post by LithiumSalts)
No. No! Just no! This is offending my very eyeballs! You cannot use such crap to prove crap! While it may be accepted that you can write 4*4 as 44, fourty four does not equal sixteen. I write it in full words so it may pass the part of your brain that prevents you from expressing yourself in a way the rest of us can comprehend. Please go away and play with your barbies. As someone who studies A level Maths and Physics and has a best friend who studies A level Further Maths, you are putting my vodka-induced idiotic proofs to shame
Now shoo little child.

This was posted from The Student Room's Android App on my GT-S5830

if 4*4 can be wrote as 44 then 44 can be equal to 16 because 4*4=16 and yes fourty-four doesn't equal sixteen but four-four does if thats what you mean.

New Question coming soon!!!

[skibur]

(Original post by Dalek1099)
if 4*4 can be wrote as 44 then 44 can be equal to 16 because 4*4=16 and yes fourty-four doesn't equal sixteen but four-four does if thats what you mean.

New Question coming soon!!!

you are talking absolute ****; take the hint that nearly everyone on this thread is trying to give you

[Dalek1099]

(Original post by skibur)
you are talking absolute ****; take the hint that nearly everyone on this thread is trying to give you

Anyway new question,about rolling a number

The answer is in the spoiler.

Spoiler:

Show

2.1

[f1mad]

Why is this thread not locked yet?

[Dalek1099]

(Original post by f1mad)
Why is this thread not locked yet?

so that I can update you with more and more questions and discuss symbolic math and if it was locked I would have to create A-Level SY2 question(really tough mark II,so there is no point until it reaches 10,000 posts.

[raheem94]

(Original post by Dalek1099)
Anyway new question,about rolling a number

The answer is in the spoiler.

Spoiler:

Show

2.1

Which new topics does this question require?

[f1mad]

(Original post by Dalek1099)
so that I can update you with more and more questions and discuss symbolic math and if it was locked I would have to create A-Level SY2 question(really tough mark II,so there is no point until it reaches 10,000 posts.

[Dalek1099]

(Original post by raheem94)
Which new topics does this question require?

The roll of a number is between the number and its minus value and the total roll consists of 4 times the number eg.3 has 4 roll points 3,0,-3,0 and then after that back to 3 again-you will also have to apply circumference and trigonometry rules to get the answer.

[raheem94]

(Original post by Dalek1099)
The roll of a number is between the number and its minus value and the total roll consists of 4 times the number eg.3 has 4 roll points 3,0,-3,0 and then after that back to 3 again-you will also have to apply circumference and trigonometry rules to get the answer.

This question is well beyond me!

[Zuzuzu]

(Original post by Dalek1099)
The roll of a number is between the number and its minus value and the total roll consists of 4 times the number eg.3 has 4 roll points 3,0,-3,0 and then after that back to 3 again-you will also have to apply circumference and trigonometry rules to get the answer.

You're by far my favourite poster on here*. Have a +rep.

*apart from myself.