Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years

Discuss issues related to the politics of the UK, such as the actions of any MP, any current or potential law, or any other factor affecting the British political system.

Announcements Posted on
Please change your TSR password 23-05-2013
Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera 20-05-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. lesley keith's Avatar
    • New Member
    • Posts: 4
    Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    ..........to help improve the "economy."

    Do they think the English. Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish people are still dumb enough to fall for this excuse? I am surprised he didn't add "we need more doctors" and "to do they jobs the British won't do." :rolleyes:

    So current predictions would be England would be minority White by 2066, yet DESPITE knowing this "politicians" such as Osborne are continuing to insist we need MORE immigration.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...g-7939667.html

    At least Miliband said Blair got it wrong on EU IMMIGRATION.........oh wait Millipede....i just realized........what about the NON EU IMMIGRATION :rolleyes:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...gration-labour
  2. PicardianSocialist's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Posts: 265
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    Why exactly is immigration a bad thing again?
  3. JamesNeedHelp2's Avatar
    • 'Custom User Title'- HAHA What A Joke! ^^
    • Location: Dont ask, Dont tell- wont happen >.<
    • Posts: 2,030
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by PicardianSocialist)
    Why exactly is immigration a bad thing again?
    This.
  4. M^2012's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 94
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    Ok, let's let nobody immigrate and just sit back as we all get old, with few children to support us, and try to live under a government unable to pay anybody sufficient pensions/invest in anything.
  5. pr0view's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: Leeds
    • Posts: 1,069
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by M^2012)
    Ok, let's let nobody immigrate and just sit back as we all get old, with few children to support us, and try to live under a government unable to pay anybody sufficient pensions/invest in anything.
    Or we could just have Children like we have done for the past 200,000 years.
  6. pr0view's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: Leeds
    • Posts: 1,069
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by PicardianSocialist)
    Why exactly is immigration a bad thing again?
    Its not in times of economic prosperity when the country has low unemployment and the immigration level is tightly controlled to ensure new arrivals have the required skills and attitudes to work and integrate into British society.

    But lets be real bringing 250,000 plus people of which many are not the doctors and scientists that politicians pretend them to be into an already overpopulated country every year against the wishes of the electorate is only effective at turning your once peaceful country into a potential Yugoslavia.
  7. ukip72's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: European Union
    • Posts: 1,263
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    Another nice excuse for this pathetic governments failure to reduce migration and keep their manifesto pledge. The Tories make me sick.
  8. M^2012's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 94
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by pr0view)
    Or we could just have Children like we have done for the past 200,000 years.
    ...but we aren't, at least not as much.
  9. PicardianSocialist's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Posts: 265
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by pr0view)
    Its not in times of economic prosperity when the country has low unemployment and the immigration level is tightly controlled to ensure new arrivals have the required skills and attitudes to work and integrate into British society.
    There is a natural mechanism for determining whether someone has the skills to work in Britain and it's called the market. If you can find a job, you have the skills to work here.

    (Original post by pr0view)
    But lets be real bringing 250,000 plus people of which many are not the doctors and scientists that politicians pretend them to be into an already overpopulated country every year against the wishes of the electorate is only effective at turning your once peaceful country into a potential Yugoslavia.
    I don't necessarily want more doctors and scientists. I might want to employ a janitor, a night watchmen or a street sweeper. Why can't these people come in?
  10. feelingsupersonic's Avatar
    • Respected Member
    • Location: Scotland
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    Our population is ageing greatly. We need more young, economically active people or else we will struggle greatly.
  11. bmqib's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Location: The secret location
    • Posts: 1,071
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    Yup, just be selective about who you allow in. Kick out the non contributing immigrants if you have to.
  12. pr0view's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: Leeds
    • Posts: 1,069
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by PicardianSocialist)
    There is a natural mechanism for determining whether someone has the skills to work in Britain and it's called the market. If you can find a job, you have the skills to work here.
    Some people may be able to find work here but in doing so they will be putting someone who was born here out of a job. The same amount of people are still working but instead someone else is now claiming JSA.

    (Original post by PicardianSocialist)
    I don't necessarily want more doctors and scientists. I might want to employ a janitor, a night watchmen or a street sweeper. Why can't these people come in?
    Because there are plenty of unemployed people in the UK who can do these jobs and before you said they won't do them well lets just make it clear the government should make them by withdrawing JSA as soon as it is clear a job has been made available to them.
  13. pr0view's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: Leeds
    • Posts: 1,069
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by M^2012)
    ...but we aren't, at least not as much.
    I'm sure we could find a fix rather than use it as a pathetic excuse to keep shipping in immigrants.
  14. Gangee's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Posts: 294
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    He's off his rocker, we need to cut immigration - us Brits desperately need the jobs
  15. Jack93o's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,846
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    LOL what a shambles :rofl:
  16. M^2012's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 94
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by pr0view)
    I'm sure we could find a fix rather than use it as a pathetic excuse to keep shipping in immigrants.
    Surely "shipping in immigrants" is a pretty effective "fix"?

    I also don't understand why it's a "pathetic excuse", exactly?
  17. x_Natalie_x's Avatar
    • Full Member
    • Posts: 145
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by feelingsupersonic)
    Our population is ageing greatly. We need more young, economically active people or else we will struggle greatly.
    I greatly disagree with you
  18. boba's Avatar
    • Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
    • Posts: 4,923
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by pr0view)
    I'm sure we could find a fix rather than use it as a pathetic excuse to keep shipping in immigrants.
    how? how are you going to force people to have more children
  19. Will Lucky's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Location: Manchester
    • Posts: 1,645
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by pr0view)
    Or we could just have Children like we have done for the past 200,000 years.
    Yeah, forcing the population to have children sounds like a great idea, be sure to tell me how that works out.
  20. pr0view's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Location: Leeds
    • Posts: 1,069
    Re: Osborne says Britain needs HIGHER levels of immigration over the next 50 years
    (Original post by M^2012)
    Surely "shipping in immigrants" is a pretty effective "fix"?

    I also don't understand why it's a "pathetic excuse", exactly?
    It might be effective but its a fairly extreme measure to start replacing an entire ethnic group with another rather that just encourage the other to reproduce.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Useful resources
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.