De Moivre's Theorem
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Re: De Moivre's TheoremYou'll get your(Original post by Fing4)
Hello, could somebody please point out where I am going wrong please?
Question is show that
.
I started out by letting
and trying
and
with no further progress as I only get cos(6theta) instead of sin.
from
, using de Moivre's theorem. You can also then expand it binomially and equate imaginary parts. Then it's just a case of some trig identities.
-
Re: De Moivre's TheoremThe previous question was to find(Original post by dknt)
You'll get your
from
, using de Moivre's theorem. You can also then expand it binomially and equate imaginary parts. Then it's just a case of some trig identities.
and I did it by setting
and using trig identities for
.
Is there a reason why this method didn't work for
?
Edit: Oh and thank you! Much easier using the 'conventional' de Moivre's theorem way rather than using the z+1/z stuffLast edited by Fing4; 13-07-2012 at 14:15. -
Re: De Moivre's TheoremWell it should work both ways whether you start on the LHS and work to the RHS or from RHS to LHS, as its an identity, but one way will require a lot more work. For example you'd have to use a lot more identities and would probably just end up with even more (confusing) steps.(Original post by Fing4)
The previous question was to find
and I did it by setting
and using trig identities for
.
Is there a reason why this method didn't work for
?
Edit: Oh and thank you! Much easier using the 'conventional' de Moivre's theorem way rather than using the z+1/z stuff
As a note, if you're asked to show for example
terms in
use the method I just used. However there may be times when they ask you to show for example
terms in
, in which case use the (z -1/z) etc and expand out etc. Probably best to do an example yourself.
Last edited by dknt; 13-07-2012 at 14:53.