Question from Siklos Booklet
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Question from Siklos Booklet
Page 15 of this booklet: http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad...tep/advpcm.pdf
I can't understand how he get from one line to another:
Last edited by Dog4444; 14-07-2012 at 23:39. -
Re: Question from Siklos BookletYou should know that if(Original post by Dog4444)
There's another one:

What does f(x^2+1...) means? Does it mean that if we put a polynomial x^2+1 into some function f like (f(x)=2x) so f(x^2+1)=2(x^2+1) )?
And the same question for (1+t^-2)f(t)
is a function then
is what you get by substituting
for
in the expression of
, and similarly
is what you get by substituting
for
. And
is just
.
So for instance if
then
and
.
Last edited by nuodai; 17-07-2012 at 16:28. -
Re: Question from Siklos BookletRight, i see.(Original post by jack.hadamard)
Yes. To make it less ambiguous, I would use the substitution
So, you have


Is it right that
? Or is it not always the case?
-
Re: Question from Siklos BookletOr indeed(Original post by DFranklin)
E.g. f(x) = x+1, then f(a+b) = a+b+1, while f(a)+f(b) = a+1 + b + 1 = a+b+2.
. Then
. (It's my favourite counterexample.)
-
Re: Question from Siklos BookletThis one has never occurred to me.(Original post by nuodai)
It's my favourite counterexample.
Nice.
PRSOM
-
Re: Question from Siklos BookletIt's one approach, which is different from the one that Siklos uses.(Original post by Dog4444)
Guys, I'm stuck. I tried to substitute
But I failed to show that
,
because
Is it the right approach at all? Because I can't get to f(t) otherwise.
Start by multiplying top and bottom by
, and then notice that
. This ultimately yields
, which isn't very ideal because of that pesky
.
Or is it? We know
, and so
. Expanding the LHS gives
, which provides you with a means of expressing
in terms of
.
-
Re: Question from Siklos Booklet(Original post by jack.hadamard)
How did you find
?
EDIT: that is meant to be more of a hint than an actual question.
and the rest follows. But i cant see how it helps.
-
Re: Question from Siklos Bookletlol a little bit sleepy, it works out, thanks.(Original post by nuodai)
Psst... read my reply...
For the second part, why would you bother about the first part if you can just substitute the same thing in? I mean, what's the point of the first part?Last edited by Dog4444; 19-07-2012 at 01:28. -
Re: Question from Siklos BookletIt's much harder to (off the cuff) express(Original post by Dog4444)
For the second part, why would you bother about the first part if you can just substitute the same thing in? I mean, what's the point of the first part?
solely in terms of
than it is to express
in terms of
. As a general rule, if you make an expression look cleaner then you're moving in the right direction. Siklos's method applies this philosophy straight away, and ends up reaching the solution faster, but all is not lost by doing it your way.
-
Re: Question from Siklos BookletOk, and why would you consider a fucntion f((x^2+1)^{1/2}...) rather than (x^2+1)^{1/2}... on it's own? Is it to to generalise some integrals?(Original post by nuodai)
It's much harder to (off the cuff) express
solely in terms of
than it is to express
in terms of
. As a general rule, if you make an expression look cleaner then you're moving in the right direction. Siklos's method applies this philosophy straight away, and ends up reaching the solution faster, but all is not lost by doing it your way.
-
Re: Question from Siklos BookletI think this problem is quite contrived for the purposes of setting a STEP question, but it's not completely useless: for instance, it provides a starting point for integrating(Original post by Dog4444)
Ok, and why would you consider a fucntion f((x^2+1)^{1/2}...) rather than (x^2+1)^{1/2}... on it's own? Is it to to generalise some integrals?
, since
, and therefore functions of the form
by setting
.
Last edited by nuodai; 19-07-2012 at 11:51.
Nice.
PRSOM