(Original post by thegrinningskull)
i'm gonna respond to your 911 post, i also want to point out that i believe the 911 "conspiracy theory" as you put it and i am skeptical about jfk but i haven't researched that as much. The rest i think are silly, like the moon landing being faked, i mean c'mon.
With 911, please tell me how they identified all the 19 hijackers some of which are still alive today? Or at least after the incident for a few years?
You also need to remember that these buildings were actually designed for plane crashes.
Who won on the insurance a large sum of money? Twice for 2 towers? Such a big insurance claim to make specifically one that lists terrorist attacks.
What is this about iron spheres being found on top of nearby buildings in the rubble? (can't be iron workers on nearby buildings
from which samples of the dust were taken).
Another one is why are the collapses so fast? They take the same amount of time to fall as demolitions, they look the same, why is this now completely different in terms of collapse pattern?
How did the core columns fail all along the tower?
You mentioned planes went into the buildings, yet remember that no plane went into building 7.
Why are there projectiles flying out of the building and being accelerated in different directions?
The best guy to watch i would say is the youtube channel "warcrime911". He has a lot of very logical arguments that are rational and make sense.
Then for the pentagon i would recommend this video despite the long time which you'll have to excuse.
i haven't discussed 911 in a long time but these are primarily the key points (i may not have mentioned them all and you'll have to forgive if i make some mistakes).
Edit: Another thing to add: Nanothermite found by scientists in the dust http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=st5iod17gn8
edit 2: You can also paint nanothermite so that when it is subject to fire (from the planes), you get strucural failure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixmjq...eature=related