Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Core Maths 4: Differential equations

Announcements Posted on
    • Thread Starter
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Hi there

    Please could someone take a loko at the below and for question 4, tell me why I am getting a slightly different answer to whats in the book, and for question 5, explain how to do this as I have completely gone off the rails lol

    I am really struggling with these types of questions, so if anyone can give me a little Differential equations for dummies guide or point me in the direction of one, I would be most grateful, cheers;


    Question 4:



    Question 5:





    Many thanks
    • 388 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    First one: How on Earth are you getting exponentials? Separate the variables and integrate!
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    first one:

    integral 1/h^1/2 dh = integral k dt

    where do you get exp from?
    • 388 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Second one is no better.

    \int \frac{1}{x-x^2} \, dx \neq - \ln |x-x^2| + c

    Factorise the denominator of the integrand and split it into partial fractions.
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    1/(x(x-1) does integrate to ln(x(x-1)

    you need to split it into partial fractions.
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    lol,there is an echo is this thread
    • 74 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    And I can only echo too

    OP you seem to have misunderstood this topic completely

    You do not even begin correctly

    \frac{dh}{dt} = -k\sqrt{h}
    • 388 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TenOfThem)
    And I can only echo too

    OP you seem to have misunderstood this topic completely

    You do not even begin correctly

    \frac{dh}{dt} = -k\sqrt{h}
    I ignored that as the negative sign can be incorporated within the constant of proportionality. Think the other problems are more glaring!
    • 74 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mr M)
    Think the other problems are more glaring!
    Agreed
    • Thread Starter
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    ok thank you all for your replies.

    I have managed to solve question 5, but am still having trouble with question 4.

    With question 4, is this going in the right direction;

    2√h = -kt + c

    4h = (-kt)² + c

    h = 1/4(-kt)² + c

    ???

    Then does, c = 200?
    • 388 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jackie11)
    ok thank you all for your replies.

    I have managed to solve question 5, but am still having trouble with question 4.

    With question 4, is this going in the right direction;

    2√h = -kt + c

    4h = (-kt)² + c

    h = 1/4(-kt)² + c

    ???

    Then does, c = 200?
    (a + b)^2 \neq a^2 + b^2
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jackie11)
    ok thank you all for your replies.

    I have managed to solve question 5, but am still having trouble with question 4.

    With question 4, is this going in the right direction;

    2√h = -kt + c

    4h = (-kt)² + c

    h = 1/4(-kt)² + c

    ???

    Then does, c = 200?
    Definitely going in the right direction, but I'm not convinced on your workings between lines 1 and 2 as you should square all of the right hand side as well. I know that a constant squared is just another constant, but you should also get -2ckt which you haven't got. Therefore, I would just substitute some values into the top line to find values for k and c. I think that works out fine.
    • Thread Starter
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Quip)
    Definitely going in the right direction, but I'm not convinced on your workings between lines 1 and 2 as you should square all of the right hand side as well. I know that a constant squared is just another constant, but you should also get -2ckt which you haven't got. Therefore, I would just substitute some values into the top line to find values for k and c. I think that works out fine.
    ok how about this;

    2√h = -kt + c

    when h = 200, t = 0

    2√200 = c

    when h = 128, t = 5

    2√128 = -5k + 2√200
    2√128 - 2√200 = -5k
    -5.656 = -5k
    5.656 = 5k
    1.13 = k
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jackie11)
    ok how about this;

    2√h = -kt + c

    when h = 200, t = 0

    2√200 = c

    when h = 128, t = 5

    2√128 = -5k + 2√200
    2√128 - 2√200 = -5k
    -5.656 = -5k
    5.656 = 5k
    1.13 = k
    If this is still relevant, yes that's right (I think), but it may be more useful to keep k as a surd though.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: July 27, 2012
New on TSR

The future of apprenticeships

Join the discussion in the apprenticeships hub!

Article updates
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.