You are Here: Home

# Step1 1996 q6

Announcements Posted on
Talking about ISA/EMPA specifics is against our guidelines - read more here 28-04-2016

1. By using the formula, I did get to:

Because other terms cancel out, I got

But, if thats true, than:

EDIT:
If the bit above is correct. Can anyone help me to prove sin(x/2)=xsin(1/2) for 0<x<pi?
Or show me mistakes in case it's wrong (what it's very likely to be)
2. Where it says , it actually means .

That is, the is actually inside the sin function.

Also, - just take x = 10, clearly
3. (Original post by dantheman1261)
Where it says , it actually means .

That is, the is actually inside the sin function.

Also, - just take x = 10, clearly
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu, thanks.

Why didn't they put the brackets? Or are there any notational rules about it?
4. (Original post by Dog4444)
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu, thanks.

Why didn't they put the brackets?
I looked at that, and aside from the fact that I couldn't work out what you were asking, I thought the original question was poorly formed - it just looks wrong.

However, from the "Using the formula" part, it's clear that the "x" must be within the function.
5. (Original post by Dog4444)
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu, thanks.

Why didn't they put the brackets? Or are there any notational rules about it?
It's standard notation - just as if you see sin 3x then you know it means sin (3x) and not (sin 3) x
6. (Original post by davros)
It's standard notation - just as if you see sin 3x then you know it means sin (3x) and not (sin 3) x
Right, I see. It's just the brackets what confused me.

And how would you write x times sin(n+1/2)? Just xsin(n+1/2), right?
7. (Original post by Dog4444)
Right, I see. It's just the brackets what confused me.

And how would you write x times sin(n+1/2)? Just xsin(n+1/2), right?
Yup!
8. (Original post by Dog4444)
Right, I see. It's just the brackets what confused me.

And how would you write x times sin(n+1/2)? Just xsin(n+1/2), right?
Yep. If the sine part is multiplied by anything, it is generally at the beginning, like you say. The notation isn't great but it's just generally accepted - I take it you managed the question?
9. (Original post by dantheman1261)
Yep. If the sine part is multiplied by anything, it is generally at the beginning, like you say. The notation isn't great but it's just generally accepted - I take it you managed the question?
I did the first part, but there's also the second part as well:

I managed to do it for f(x). But the way I did it, was to draw some sketches of cos x, cos 2x, cos 3x from 0 to pi, and show that the area of each is 0. (I'm not sure I would get away with it at an actual exam)
But I can't do this for f(x)cosx, and I feel there's another approach apart from sketches.
10. (Original post by Dog4444)
I did the first part, but there's also the second part as well:

I managed to do it for f(x). But the way I did it, was to draw some sketches of cos x, cos 2x, cos 3x from 0 to pi, and show that the area of each is 0. (I'm not sure I would get away with it at an actual exam)
But I can't do this for f(x)cosx, and I feel there's another approach apart from sketches.
Do you know what the integral of cos(x) is? And similarly for cos(kx)? (Which function, I mean)
11. (Original post by Dog4444)
I did the first part, but there's also the second part as well:

I managed to do it for f(x). But the way I did it, was to draw some sketches of cos x, cos 2x, cos 3x from 0 to pi, and show that the area of each is 0. (I'm not sure I would get away with it at an actual exam)
But I can't do this for f(x)cosx, and I feel there's another approach apart from sketches.
For the first integral, I am not sure how you did the graphical approach but wouldn't just be simpler to actually integrate The result is quasi-immediate .
12. (Original post by dantheman1261)
Do you know what the integral of cos(x) is? And similarly for cos(kx)? (Which function, I mean)
Well, INT cos x = sin x, right?
But I dont know how to generalise it for cos kx, where k belongs to N.
13. (Original post by Dog4444)
Well, INT cos x = sin x, right?
But I dont know how to generalise it for cos kx, where k belongs to N.
Okay - what is ? That should give you a clue how to generalise it
14. (Original post by dantheman1261)
Okay - what is ? That should give you a clue how to generalise it
Didn't try inspection. Int cos kx = (1/k)sinkx. What makes f(x) part clear. Thanks.
But I still can't do f(x)cosx. The only idea I have is to integrate by parts 2cosx(sinx+1/2sin2x+1/3sin3x...1/n sin nx), what doesn't seem nice in my head(EDIT: actually, I will try this out).
15. (Original post by Dog4444)
Didn't try inspection. Int cos kx = (1/k)sinkx.
Spoiler:
Show

For the record, this works with any function: where is real and non-zero.
16. (Original post by Dog4444)
Didn't try inspection. Int cos kx = (1/k)sinkx. What makes f(x) part clear. Thanks.
But I still can't do f(x)cosx. The only idea I have is to integrate by parts 2cosx(sinx+1/2sin2x+1/3sin3x...1/n sin nx), what doesn't seem nice in my head(EDIT: actually, I will try this out).
You would be looking at not

Anyhow, remember that you don't have only one expression for

(a double IBP should work though - just seems a bit tedious!)
17. (Original post by Dog4444)
Didn't try inspection. Int cos kx = (1/k)sinkx. What makes f(x) part clear. Thanks.
But I still can't do f(x)cosx. The only idea I have is to integrate by parts 2cosx(sinx+1/2sin2x+1/3sin3x...1/n sin nx), what doesn't seem nice in my head(EDIT: actually, I will try this out).
So we want

No doubt there is more than one way of doing this - do you have any ideas? If you've tried some stuff with no luck, then:

Spoiler:
Show
Take a look at part (i), where it gives and see if that gives you any inspiration!
18. (Original post by dantheman1261)
So we want
I did integrate cosxcoskx by parts twice and got to:

And from that I assume that

Is that right?
19. (Original post by Dog4444)
I did integrate cosxcoskx by parts twice and got to:

And from that I assume that

Is that right?
What happens when k = 1?
20. (Original post by DFranklin)
What happens when k = 1?
Thanks, it seems to be true for K>1 though.

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: July 25, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### How to predict exam questions

No crystal ball required

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams