M111 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games

TSR's model parliament.

Announcements Posted on
Please change your TSR password 23-05-2013
Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera 20-05-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. Metrobeans's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 9,552
    M111 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games, TSR UKIP
    This House believes that the modern Olympic Games constitute a politicised parade of business corporations, marketing strategies, advertising and debased athletes with the exclusive purpose of economical gain, which is immensely opposite to their original relationship-improving function in the ancient and early modern times. This House condemns the devaluation of this athletic event to a mere exhibition of private corporations.


    Notes

  2. tehFrance's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: Londres
    • Warning points: 10
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    You have to take the fun out of it don't you.
  3. CLS94's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,830
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    Suprised at this coming from UKIP, but Aye all the way - they are a mess and a pointless drain on public resources. For anyone who happens to be interested, there is a protest planned this Saturday against their corporate nature and the draconian measures that have been enacted to help "VIPs" and Olympic Sponsors: https://www.facebook.com/events/291553350941427/
  4. toronto353's Avatar
    • Community Assistant
    • PS Helper
    • Wiki Support Team
    • TSR Legend
    • Posts: 13,119
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    (Original post by CLS94)
    Suprised at this coming from UKIP, but Aye all the way - they are a mess and a pointless drain on public resources. For anyone who happens to be interested, there is a protest planned this Saturday against their corporate nature and the draconian measures that have been enacted to help "VIPs" and Olympic Sponsors: https://www.facebook.com/events/291553350941427/
    UKIP house a vast array of views so occasionally we surprise people.
  5. Smack's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: Aberdeen
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    Agree fully. It's terrible that we're going to have people actually policing the brands that can be displayed and associated with the olympics - surely it's something that the entire country should benefit from and not just some of the largest corporations who can afford exclusive rights.
  6. Hopple's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: London
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    I don't think anyone can disagree with this.
  7. JPKC's Avatar
    • Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
    • Posts: 3,777
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    Aye!
  8. xXedixXx's Avatar
    • Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
    • Location: Hertfordshire
    • Posts: 4,130
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    I'm also surprised to see this from UKIP.

    Aye.
  9. SciFiRory's Avatar
    • no matter what we own, we can't buy freedom...
    • Location: Bath/Bristol
    • Posts: 11,420
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    UKIP? :holmes:

    but Aye nonetheless
  10. Life_peer's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Location: Slovak republic
    • Posts: 1,655
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    You have made me smile.
  11. Stiff Little Fingers's Avatar
    • Section Moderator
    • I am a traveller of both time and space
    • Location: Bradford
    • Posts: 6,069
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    I didn't see this coming from UKIP, but aye of course - it's a prestigious, historical sporting event, not a collection of billboards ffs.
  12. toronto353's Avatar
    • Community Assistant
    • PS Helper
    • Wiki Support Team
    • TSR Legend
    • Posts: 13,119
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    (Original post by xXedixXx)
    I'm also surprised to see this from UKIP.

    Aye.

    (Original post by SciFiRory)
    UKIP? :holmes:

    but Aye nonetheless

    (Original post by Alofleicester)
    I didn't see this coming from UKIP, but aye of course - it's a prestigious, historical sporting event, not a collection of billboards ffs.
    What can I say? We're traditionalists.
  13. thunder_chunky's Avatar
    • And all the roads we have to walk are winding
    • Location: Eternia
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    It's certainly questionable that the three main sponspors are Coca Cola Cadbury's and Mcdonalds. Ironic really seeing as it's for a sporting event.
    So this is potentially an aye from me. As much as it pains me.
  14. LETSJaM's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 3,293
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    Abstain.

    <3 x
  15. Mechie's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 6,548
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    Agreed.
  16. tehFrance's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: Londres
    • Warning points: 10
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    (Original post by thunder_chunky)
    It's certainly questionable that the three main sponspors are Coca Cola Cadbury's and Mcdonalds.
    Why Cadbury's? I would of thought that Cadbury's being British would of given it a pass, I completely agree with Coca Cola and McDonalds though, they should not be there... PepsiCo if they were to sponsor would be fine due to the fact they have a sizeable healthy business side unlike Coca Cola.
  17. Melancholy's Avatar
    • TSR Judge, Gentleman and Former Mod
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    Nay - I think this is an exaggeration. Realistically, the vast majority of air time will be devoted to showing the actual sport or event. It's against these companies' interests to frustrate you with constant adverts. Heck, I doubt you'll notice them most of the time, like in football stadiums and on players' shirts. The fact is, private sector investment means that the public purse doesn't have to stretch so far. Sports events, cultural events, entertainment industries and so forth are not exactly priorities for government expenditure in the same way that health, education and policing are. I'd rather call upon the help of private enterprise to ensure the best athletic show on earth than continue to whittle away other sources of capital.

    That said, I'm not completely against restrictions on marketing when it comes to companies that produce negative externalities (arguably unhealthy food industries which put strains on our NHS), especially when combined with a sports event. But the original motion isn't attacking this. It's inaccurately suggesting the devaluation of the olympics at the hands of the private sector, which I think is false. These companies make the Games better at little extra cost to us. Cadbury has a history of philanthropy, too. MacDonalds, less so. And what the heck is wrong with the Coca-Cola Company? Not all their products are unhealthy, and they are hydrating. And why should we care if it's American?
    Last edited by Melancholy; 26-07-2012 at 00:37.
  18. Birchington's Avatar
    • Community Assistant
    • Wiki Support Team
    • Secretary General of the Model UN
    • Location: Leicester
    • Posts: 5,225
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    No. The Olympics are going to be fantastic, just wait and see.

    I have been volunteering at the Stadium for nearly a month, and the amount of work that has gone in from everyone should not be moaned at.

    I also saw a full rehearsal for the opening ceremony tonight - you're in for a treat! Lighten up and enjoy this once in a lifetime event. Yes, the corporate sponsors may have a large presence, but they have invested in youth sports facilities etc. They don't just take.
  19. Lipvig's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 790
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    (Original post by Birchington)
    No. The Olympics are going to be fantastic, just wait and see.

    I have been volunteering at the Stadium for nearly a month, and the amount of work that has gone in from everyone should not be moaned at.

    I also saw a full rehearsal for the opening ceremony tonight - you're in for a treat! Lighten up and enjoy this once in a lifetime event. Yes, the corporate sponsors may have a large presence, but they have invested in youth sports facilities etc. They don't just take.
    I thought the ceremony was tomorrow?

    (Any chance you know who's lighting the cauldron btw?)
  20. barnetlad's Avatar
    • Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
    • Location: Barnet
    • Posts: 4,507
    Re: M108 - Motion on the modern Olympic Games
    I wish it had been more focused on the sponsors and corporate tickets, and the ridiculous restrictions on the use of the word Olympics and things such as not being able to buy Pepsi or pay with Mastercard. I assume Amy McDonald is not at the opening or closing ceremony concerts because of her name.

    You can get reasonable food in the Olympic Park (as I did on Monday), even with the horrid McDonalds 'restaurant' near the stadium.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.