BBC don't give up their socialist agenda
Got a breaking news topic or want to post the most recent issues for sensible, on-topic discussion? This is the forum for you.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning | 16-05-2013 | |
-
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaThe BBC isn't 'left-wing' in the slightest. It's to the left of the centre-right, but to claim that it is leftist is borderline stupid.(Original post by billydisco)
You do realise its a well known fact the BBC are a very left-wing organisation?
What did you expect them to do, not report on the monarchy? Just because they broadcast it doesn't mean they aren't left wing!
It's a populist news outlet, and the masses seem content with centrist/centre-right policies. Furthermore, the majority of Britain is certainly not in favour of advocating true leftist principles, hence why there is no real socialist opposition to the Tory, Lib Dem, New Labour establishment.Last edited by Stalin; 04-08-2012 at 00:45. -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaNo, what daddy does is give them more opportunities at sport.(Original post by billydisco)
So what does "Daddy" buy the swimmer? A pair of new arms? -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaWhat? What the **** is that? gimp.(Original post by billydisco)
You tell me which part of national statistics collects it and i will go and get it. -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaAnd yet, it is the most popular and profitable.(Original post by billydisco)
Funny how our most embarrassing sports team (football) is dominated by the "lout class" -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaWhat, gym membership? A new bike? lol(Original post by desijut)
No, what daddy does is give them more opportunities at sport. -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaits true though state schools never do sports(Original post by billydisco)
They'll never give up will they? Time to do something about the BBC!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-19109724
Anyone else fed up of the Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation?
you have to do them yourself at local sports clubLast edited by sucess; 04-08-2012 at 01:45. -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agenda
@ the OP, you are getting the old left mixed up with the new left.
The new left is dominated by privately educated types, and focuses on identity politics more than issues of the working class.
I think its an issue how the media and political class are dominated by privately educated people, it comes out in the politics, showing that there isn't a mainstream political party or newspaper for people from the lower class backgrounds. -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaI would say the BBC is centre left, it outright advocates multiculturalism and feminism and is dominated by media intellectuals who studies sociology and politics at university, i worked for the bbc and its full of middle class wannabe champagne socialists.(Original post by Stalin)
The BBC isn't 'left-wing' in the slightest. It's to the left of the centre-right, but to claim that it is leftist is borderline stupid.
It's a populist news outlet, and the masses seem content with centrist/centre-right policies. Furthermore, the majority of Britain is certainly not in favour of advocating true leftist principles, hence why there is no real socialist opposition to the Tory, Lib Dem, New Labour establishment. -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agenda
Those bloody public school bolsheviks running the bbc are at it again.
The publicly schooled tory leader and his publicly schooled cabinet aren't tories.
Clearly these public school kids are wrong uns who shouldn't be trusted.
Thanks for highlighting the damage being caused to the country by awful public school kids, we'd never have guessed. -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaA pool?(Original post by billydisco)
So what does "Daddy" buy the swimmer? A pair of new arms?
-
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaThey are? I don't think that's true. Especially when we're referring to athletics clubs with professional coaches.(Original post by billydisco)
They have an equal opportunity- athletics clubs are usually free!
On a brief search of clubs in my city, all 6 I have looked at have subscription fees. On top of transport fees and entry fees (if the athletics equipment is in a Sportspark). Then this multiplies with repeat visits in a week.
Finance is still a barrier between the poor[er] and the possibility of training enough to reach the top of sport. Perhaps a bursary scheme is called for? -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaStatistical evidence is still evidence (hint: the clue is in the name).(Original post by billydisco)
No I didn't.....
Reading not your best skill?Some things evidence doesn't exist/get collected. Plus if you look hard enough you can find statistical evidence to prove anything- which makes statistical evidence completely pointless.
Debating not your best skill? -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaWell known by who? That's nonsense. The BBC simply supports the status quo, wherever it happens to be at the time. Given the post-Thatcher positions of the main parties, that means it will average out somewhere slightly right of centre (some stuff will be centrist, some left of centre).(Original post by billydisco)
You do realise its a well known fact the BBC are a very left-wing organisation? -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaExcept as stated before, those with TALENT are quite often sucked up by Private schools anyway by scholarships. This is a good thing.(Original post by akj08)
I think we have to assume that raw athletic talent must be equally distributed amongst the classes. Therefore those with the potential to become Olympic champions are equally likely to go to a state school or a private school, and the proportion of privately educated Olympic champions should be roughly comparable to that of the general population, i.e. less than 10%. It's not raw talent that's lacking, it's the identification, support, coaching, training, facilities etc. etc. which are unfortunately not nearly as good in the state sector. Not to mention that most state-educated people don't have the option to try olympic sports like equestrian or rowing. It's got nothing to do with a 'competitive environment'.
In the end, it all comes down to money. It's not fair or just that if two people had the same raw talent, work ethic and determination, the one whose parents were most able to nurture this - mostly financially - would be more likely to succeed. That's why it's in the news. -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaSo the priority isn't to win? The priority is to have a representation of society? Makes perfect sense.(Original post by BBC)
"Football is different, it is an interesting example. The balance of professional football is that around 7% of players come from the private sector, which is an absolute mirror image of society.
"That should be the case in every single sport and that should be the priority in each and every sport
I wonder whether we're also going to see a push to have a "mirror image" of society in racial terms?
-
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agenda
I'm sick to death of this argument... People on the left insist the BBC is right wing, people on the right insist it's left wing. I remember during the last Israeli war - an Israeli group and a Palestinian group protested about the blatant bias shown by the BBC to the other side.
Good enough for me to come to the conclusion they're more or less neutral! It always seems to be a case of people insisting anyone closer to the opposing political spectrum than they are must be biased... -
Re: BBC don't give up their socialist agendaExcept the BBC didn't say that, the Chairman of the British Olympic Association said that and the BBC reported it, which is quite different and what a lot of people in this thread seem not to have noticed.(Original post by Sabertooth)
So the priority isn't to win? The priority is to have a representation of society? Makes perfect sense.
I wonder whether we're also going to see a push to have a "mirror image" of society in racial terms?