Permutations algebra
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Re: Permutations algebraExpand out the (n-k)! on the top too - then you just have a product from n to 1, which is n!
Just replace the
in the numerator by the result of the first part, then remember that

Replace k by k+1 in the formula for ^nC_{k}. Then see if you can work out why it's true (if not, post the result of this substitution and any working you do(Original post by SubAtomic)
So it can be seen (though not by me
) that

can be obtained by multiplying
by the fraction

Don't get it
)
When I did it, it was in S1(Original post by SubAtomic)
Also what part of the A-level syllabus is permutations and combinations?
Last edited by dantheman1261; 05-08-2012 at 18:48. -
Re: Permutations algebraNo idea what to do here, at least I don't think I do, would it be(Original post by dantheman1261)
Expand out the (n-k)! on the top too

Nope no idea
Never seen what to do and don't think I have an example in my book.
Maybe I am just supposed to take it for what it is and not try to derive it myself?Last edited by SubAtomic; 05-08-2012 at 19:20. -
Re: Permutations algebraOh dear(Original post by notnek)
That's right and every factorial ends is a 1 so you have:
missed that.
-
Re: Permutations algebraThat's right. Do you see how it works? What about the other parts of the question?(Original post by SubAtomic)
So if I were to rewrite it like this it would make more sense to me, but correct me if I am wrong, I think I am, yep wrong way round. Is it right now?
-
Re: Permutations algebraThat's correct now you've edited it(Original post by SubAtomic)
So if I were to rewrite it like this it would make more sense to me, but correct me if I am wrong, I think I am, yep wrong way round. Is it right now?
-
Re: Permutations algebraYeah that's right(Original post by SubAtomic)
Dan, yes I think so, so basically the second part I am just multiplying top and bottom by (n-k)! to get the denom like it is? If so I think I see the nCk now
(what I wrote was more unnecessarily convoluted than that). That should lead you on nicely to the last part
-
Re: Permutations algebra
There is something similar covered in C2, but I can get answers using the formula just cannot quite work the formula out for myself. Anywhere I can see a proof of what I am trying to work out in the above post? Think I have lost the plot
Last edited by SubAtomic; 05-08-2012 at 23:36. -
Re: Permutations algebraYou have said in your first line that(Original post by SubAtomic)
So here goes but not too sure what I am doing

So if I replace the k with k+1 in the
formula I end up with


Need to dwell, much appreciated guys

but this is not true.
Try doing the same thing using the correct result:
-
Re: Permutations algebraThink it is the book that is sending me on a tangent, the book says, it can be seen from equation (5.6) that(Original post by notnek)
You have said in your first line that

but this is not true.
Try doing the same thing using the correct result:
can be obtained by multiplying
by the fraction
equation 5.6 is given as 
So will try it your way now, tried it that way first but it but backtracked because of the book
I end up with

Can I cancel the (n-k) or does the factorial stop this being possible?
Would I end up with

Maybe it is because I was taking
as
rather than
but the book shows it as the former
Last edited by SubAtomic; 06-08-2012 at 12:47. -
Re: Permutations algebraThey are equal to each other(Original post by SubAtomic)
Maybe it is because I was taking
as
rather than
but the book shows it as the former
-
Re: Permutations algebraHad my suspicions about this.
Thank you, makes complete sense now(Original post by notnek)
But you have
on the top and
on the bottom so there is a factor of
that you can cancel. So


Now notice that
is equal to
in the same way that e.g. 5x4!=5! or 8x7!=8!.
Does it make sense now?
So I should have expanded the factorial on the bottom to do it, and also used the complete result for
rather than (5.6)?
Yep it didn't help my seeing what was going on though
I need to see everything to understand it sometimes.
Also the book didn't ask this of me so was it a good idea for me to look into it or should I sometimes just take a formula for what it is?
Had no problem using the formula but just didn't get the steps to acquire the formula
Last edited by SubAtomic; 06-08-2012 at 13:13. -
Re: Permutations algebraI'm finding it hard to see how the book is explaining things without seeing the book. The equation doesn't seem relevant but it might be if I could see all of the working.(Original post by SubAtomic)
Thank you, makes complete sense now
So I should have expanded the factorial on the bottom to do it, and also used the complete result for
rather than (5.6)?
Yep it didn't help my seeing what was going on though
I need to see everything to understand it sometimes.
Also the book didn't ask this of me so was it a good idea for me to look into it or should I sometimes just take a formula for what it is?
Which book is it? I may be able to find the pages online. -
Re: Permutations algebraI got confused because you didn't write down the(Original post by SubAtomic)
Attached pics of a few pages, probably me being a moron
Binomial theorem, permutations and combinations is covered in 6 pages, don't know if that was enough for the first time I have seen it.
part when posting eqn (5.6) although I probably should've noticed that they were equal.
So if we use (5.6):

then

and you can write this in a different way:

Also if you haven't already, you should look at the example they have given with k=2. That might make it more clear to you.


) that
)
missed that.