Is sport important?
Discuss issues that have a social and cultural impact, including but not limited to issues such as racism, teenage pregnancies, the social impact of religion, and the state of the education system.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning | 16-05-2013 | |
-
Re: Is sport important?It's not as fun as drinking and getting mortal.(Original post by philistine)
Nope, though it can certainly be entertaining. -
Re: Is sport important?You seem to be attempting to hijack your own thread. Are you a wizard?(Original post by The_Great_One)
It's not as fun as drinking and getting mortal. -
Re: Is sport important?
I think sport is really important because it gives a sense of unity as can be witnessed by the bringing together of all countries across the world, in the Olympics and other sporting championships. Sport can be fun and enjoyable, and a little bit of competition can't hurt anyone!
-
- Reputation:
- Adored and Respected Member
- Location: It's another word for a place, but that's not important right now...
- Posts: 426
Re: Is sport important?Obviously sport is important for fitness related reasons and socially making friends etc etc.
The point the OP made isn't actually that mad I don't think, although put in slightly OTT sort of way. In a world with nuclear weapons preventing major powers (if they really wanted to anyway, which is another question) attacking each other for obvious reasons, sport can be a more attractive way of getting one over another nation if there is a degree of hostility there, avoiding actual conflict. For example Olympic Basketball all the way through the Cold war featured the USSR vs the US and there was a big rivalry there. Another way they competed was in space too of course. Another way, is puppet wars like Korea and Vietnam, but presumably more countries will develop nuclear weapons with time, I don't know enough about that to say really though.
I don't know that overall, countries would look down on another for getting fewer medals or whatever, eg I doubt Spain cared too much if USA or USSR had won the basketball in 1972. It's more an internal thing - doing well creates a sense of national pride in Britain, and countries who did worse might be annoyed at their poor performance in an Olympics, but wouldn't really care if say China has more medals than them, nor would they consider them superiors. We set our own targets as a nation, perhaps passively measuring ourselves against other nations of a similar population size and if we achieve them, we're happy and proud. If not, we don't get mad at France if they do better, at least, rational people don't.
Only if there's real hostility like I mentioned with the cold war do the countries (maybe) look down on another for being less successful.
It is important I suppose in some ways - in this case as another way to rival a country without using armed force of any sort, if at all possible. Generally though it's a pretty world-unifying thing I'd say.
