Who would you rather have in power, the EDL or MDL.

Wonder how many people are taking into account what the EDL actually say, or are they just stereotyping the racist football hooligan?

Watched the interview of their leader with Paxman their main message was that they are against extremist Islam, which i am sure most people here are actually against.

But most people here will unfortunately take into account class and appearance and have skewed perspectives as usual.

Paxman was all over that guy in that interview. Just had to keep repeating the number of sharia courts in the UK and couldn't respond to his questions properly. The EDL gives people who are concerned about militant Islam a bad name.

Are you serious? The Daily Mail doesn't outright lie, the worst they have are normally small factually inaccuracies in celebrity pieces, if you actually bothered to look into it rather than listen to hysteria you'd know that. What the DM does have is normally an unabashed agenda, but bias is not lieing, to equate them only makes you look silly, as the Guardian has just the same amount of bias.

Because protests are an important part of stating what people are against? What an odd thing to get picky over.

And your full stopped statement is just what the majority of the people think. Like i said before, I gave the interview on what they said they are against, so you just full stopping me by saying a statement that only holds ground over peoples ignorance on the subject means nothing to me.

Their "small factual inaccuracies" pervade everything they print, not just the fluff stuff. I seriously worry about the mental health of anyone who would defend the Daily Mail.

..

..