How easy are the girls at university?

Misogynist analogies are neither clever nor funny. Do you honestly consider yourself as either funny or clever? Because I can only see MISOGYNY all over your post.

Misogynist analogies are neither clever nor funny. Do you honestly consider yourself as either funny or clever? Because I can only see MISOGYNY all over your post.

yikes, this thread...

Your user picture isn't helping.

Possibly hard to have sex while you're in your lectures or seminars.

Preggors at 13-14.

I totally agree, being promiscuous is fine, it's your slightly misogynistic attitude towards women that's probably offending feminists. Just avoid words like 'easy' and 'loose', or referring to women as 'pussy', I think it's a probably best to avoid using terms that wouldn't be used for men, otherwise that's just evidence of double standards.

Also, with 'you are the ones who literally offer yourselves on a silver platter, if you really hate my thread then pull your knickers up.'

and

'Why am I a douche? Don't blame the men, it's the women who open their legs instantly.'

you make it sound like a negative thing if a woman acts on her sexual desires, when I don't think it should be seen that way!

I know a girl that gave a bj in a lecture.
Note to anyone reading this if you find out a girl gave a bj in a lecture never reply with "classy" in a sarcastic tone.
Never knew slaps could hurt so much.

If a key opens many locks then it is a MASTER KEY. If a lock is opened by many keys it is a poor lock.

I am a radical feminist

OP, I am a radical feminist

wimmin eh?

Did it hurt you? Does the analogy relate to you? Are you a faulty lock?

How long is a piece of string, you douche!

Hmm, what exactly does that entail? Drawing vaginas on the toilet wall instead of penises?

It entails forcing men like you drink my period blood.

Let us make some assumptions:
The string is at least 1cm in length
Any smaller and calling it a piece of string is perhaps a misnomer, fluff would be a better definition.

The string cannot exceed one ton
Manufacturing such a string would be impractical, and would instead of being named string, would be better termed as a tourist attraction.

String is no thinner than 1.5mm
Thinner than this, and we are entering the territory of thread.

Worst case density is 0.7kg/litre
Otherwise the string will be too weak.

So, we know the maximum weight, and the volume:

$\frac{1000}{0.7} = 1429 \ litres \ or \ 1.429m^3$

Therefore, maximum length is

$\frac{Volume}{Area} = \frac{1.429m}{\pi \times 0.5mm \times 0.5mm}$

So the string length lies between 1cm and 11,644.39km which can be expressed as above.

THIS.

OP, I am a radical feminist, and I seriously see nothing wrong with the actual content of your post. But I see many wrong things with the kind of language you use.

Have all the sex you want - as long as you make sure that the girl you are having sex with actually wants to have sex with you. That's all feminists care about. As long as you don't deceive her, don't lie to her, as long you don't drug her in some way, if the sex is fully consensual, have it. I love causal sex, as long as the guy doesn't think that he needs to deceive the girl into sex by being "romantic" and "sweet" or by using alcohol.

Females LOVE causal sex. Actually, meaningless sex with a stranger is one of the most common female sex fantasies.

Be charming, honest and respectful. And please, change the way you talk about women.

But then wouldn't I just be able to punch you in the face, subdue you, and piss in your nostrils?

I have nothing against hitting women that initiate violence.