The Student Room Group

Is going to an upper mid-range university still worth it?

Having witnessed the dreaded "unsuccessful" message come up on my UCAS page for both my first and second university choices, I'd like peoples' opinions on whether obtaining a degree from an upper-middle range university is still an economically sound decision given the increase in tuition fees and the abysmal jobs market?

To give a you little more information to go on: I've applied to study Chemistry and I'm currently holding offers from Leeds, Newcastle, Southampton and Queen Mary, University of London. As I say, I'd like to know your personal view of whether studying my subject at one of the aforementioned universities is worth getting into £30,000-£40,000 worth of debt?

Thanks for taking the time to consider my question.

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Hungry Ghost
Having witnessed the dreaded "unsuccessful" message come up on my UCAS page for both my first and second university choices, I'd like peoples' opinions on whether obtaining a degree from an upper-middle range university is still an economically sound decision given the increase in tuition fees and the abysmal jobs market?

To give a you little more information to go on: I've applied to study Chemistry and I'm currently holding offers from Leeds, Newcastle, Southampton and Queen Mary, University of London. As I say, I'd like to know your personal view of whether studying my subject at one of the aforementioned universities is worth getting into £30,000-£40,000 worth of debt?

Thanks for taking the time to consider my question.

So you got rejected from your top two choices and you have 4 offers? How does that work?
Reply 2
Original post by InadequateJusticex
So you got rejected from your top two choices and you have 4 offers? How does that work?


I don't really see that this is any of your business, but if you must know, my place at QMUL was arranged via the Open University's 'Openplus' scheme, not through UCAS. Now could you possibly address the question posed in my OP?

Why on earth am I getting negged for this? :confused:
(edited 11 years ago)
Leeds, Newcastle and Southampton are not upper-middle universities. Put your copy of the Guardian down; they are top unis.

Unless you go to the big 5 then the next 20/30 unis vary in strength depending on the department. Southampton for example has one of the best engineering departments in the country.
Reply 4
Original post by Meat is Murder
Leeds, Newcastle and Southampton are not upper-middle universities. Put your copy of the Guardian down; they are top unis.

Unless you go to the big 5 then the next 20/30 unis vary in strength depending on the department. Southampton for example has one of the best engineering departments in the country.


So I assume that you would therefore be of the opinion that taking up a place to study my subject at one of these universities would be worth the financial outlay?
I'm slightly concerned about your perception of 'upper-mid range universities.' I can think of universities much, much, much lower down the league tables than those which are still well worth spending £40,000 on.
Original post by Hungry Ghost
So I assume that you would therefore be of the opinion that taking up a place to study my subject at one of these universities would be worth the financial outlay?
What's your alternative? If you want to make an objective finance based decision, it depends on what else you might do instead. If you've got a career in mind that has good non-graduate entry routes then it's probably not worth the money. If your second option is just 'try to find a job', then I think 3 years where you don't have to worry about the present ****ness of the economy followed by proper graduate opportunities is by far your best bet.
Reply 7
Original post by Rascacielos
I'm slightly concerned about your perception of 'upper-mid range universities.' I can think of universities much, much, much lower down the league tables than those which are still well worth spending £40,000 on.


Thank you very much for your opinion.

Regarding the 'upper-mid range' thing, it's just a label I've attached to them to distinguish them from the 'top' universities that I've been rejected from.
Reply 8
Original post by MancStudent098
What's your alternative? If you want to make an objective finance based decision, it depends on what else you might do instead. If you've got a career in mind that has good non-graduate entry routes then it's probably not worth the money. If your second option is just 'try to find a job', then I think 3 years where you don't have to worry about the present ****ness of the economy followed by proper graduate opportunities is by far your best bet.


I have been considering applying for a place on the NATS air traffic controller training programme as an alternative to going to university, but gaining a place obviously isn't guaranteed.
You go to university to get qualifications so that you can specialise in a particular career... those are still good universities so I think it is definitely worth it :smile:
Original post by Hungry Ghost
I don't really see that this is any of your business, but if you must know, my place at QMUL was arranged via the Open University's 'Openplus' scheme, not through UCAS. Now could you possibly address the question posed in my OP?

Why on earth am I getting negged for this? :confused:


I was merely curious; there was no need to get rude. But to answer your original question, yes, I think it is worth spending the money to study at those universities. Southampton is a lot more reputable than you think, btw.
Reply 11
Original post by Hungry Ghost
Having witnessed the dreaded "unsuccessful" message come up on my UCAS page for both my first and second university choices, I'd like peoples' opinions on whether obtaining a degree from an upper-middle range university is still an economically sound decision given the increase in tuition fees and the abysmal jobs market?

To give a you little more information to go on: I've applied to study Chemistry and I'm currently holding offers from Leeds, Newcastle, Southampton and Queen Mary, University of London. As I say, I'd like to know your personal view of whether studying my subject at one of the aforementioned universities is worth getting into £30,000-£40,000 worth of debt?

Thanks for taking the time to consider my question.


Out of interest, what were your first and second-choice universities?

It depends what you mean by 'worth the financial outlay' - if you want to become a research scientist, then having an undergraduate degree (to start with) is pretty much essential. This obviously also applies for other professions like banking or law. However, if you want to become an entrepreneur, it's not that useful. It really depends what you want to do with your life, or what types of jobs you want to be available to you in the future. All of them are good universities. If you're still hung-up on the fact that you didn't get into your top two, you could always play the risky game and a) take a gap year and reapply (which my best friend did - she declined her firm Warwick offer and the next year received an unconditional from Oxford) or b) go to one of these universities and then decide to apply for a Masters at either of the 'top two.'
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by Hungry Ghost
I have been considering applying for a place on the NATS air traffic controller training programme as an alternative to going to university, but gaining a place obviously isn't guaranteed.


If I were you, I wouldnt do it, unless you want to work in acadamia!
Reply 13
Original post by T_x
Out of interest, what were your first and second-choice universities?

It depends what you mean by 'worth the financial outlay' - if you want to become a research scientist, then having an undergraduate degree (to start with) is pretty much essential. This obviously also applies for other professions like banking or law. However, if you want to become an entrepreneur, it's not that useful. It really depends what you want to do with your life, or what types of jobs you want to be available to you in the future. All of them are good universities. If you're still hung-up on the fact that you didn't get into your top two, you could always play the risky game and a) take a gap year and reapply (which my best friend did - she declined her firm Warwick offer and the next year received an unconditional from Oxford) or b) go to one of these universities and then decide to apply for a Masters at either of the 'top two.'


The universities I was rejected from were Imperial College and Durham.

I'm not 100% sure what career path I want to follow yet to be honest. I am interested in research but I'm slightly put off by the relatively low salary and job security. All I know for sure is that I want to work in the science industry in some way or other.

Taking a gap year doesn't really appeal to me, as I have little money to do anything worthwhile. I'd most likely just end up wasting most of the year looking for a job. I think if I'm going to go to uni it really needs to be this year.
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 14
1. It's not a real debt like taking a personal loan.
2. Your perception of university prestige seems to have been thoroughly warped, possibly you've been hanging round the wannabe investment bankers forum too much.
Reply 15
Original post by InadequateJusticex
I was merely curious; there was no need to get rude. But to answer your original question, yes, I think it is worth spending the money to study at those universities. Southampton is a lot more reputable than you think, btw.


Ok, my apologies. :redface:

May I ask why you mention Southampton specifically? I was learning towards Newcastle if anything.
Reply 16
Original post by Hungry Ghost
Having witnessed the dreaded "unsuccessful" message come up on my UCAS page for both my first and second university choices, I'd like peoples' opinions on whether obtaining a degree from an upper-middle range university is still an economically sound decision given the increase in tuition fees and the abysmal jobs market?

To give a you little more information to go on: I've applied to study Chemistry and I'm currently holding offers from Leeds, Newcastle, Southampton and Queen Mary, University of London. As I say, I'd like to know your personal view of whether studying my subject at one of the aforementioned universities is worth getting into £30,000-£40,000 worth of debt?

Thanks for taking the time to consider my question.



Original post by Hungry Ghost
The universities I was rejected from were Imperial College and Durham.

I'm not 100% sure what career path I want to follow yet to be honest. I am interested in research but I'm slightly put off by the relatively low salary and job security. All I know for sure is that I want to work in the science industry in some way or other.

Taking a gap year doesn't really appeal to me, as I have little money to do anything worthwhile. I'd most likely just end up wasting most of the year looking for a job. I think if I'm going to go to uni it really needs to be this year.


Well, all the universities you have offers from are top universities - not middle range. In fact, Queen Mary is ranked higher for research than Durham.

Durham really isn't as good as people say.
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by Hungry Ghost
Ok, my apologies. :redface:

May I ask why you mention Southampton specifically? I was learning towards Newcastle if anything.


Newcastle is also reputable, but for Chemistry I just think Soton is better. Never been to Newcastle though, but my opinion is (slightly) based on league tables.
Reply 18
Original post by Hungry Ghost
The universities I was rejected from were Imperial College and Durham.

I'm not 100% sure what career path I want to follow yet to be honest. I am interested in research but I'm slightly put off by the relatively low salary and job security. All I know for sure is that I want to work in the science industry in some way or other.

Taking a gap year doesn't really appeal to me, as I have little money to do anything worthwhile. I'd most likely just end up wasting most of the year looking for a job. I think if I'm going to go to uni it really needs to be this year.


There's your answer. I would personally research to see which institution has the most 'prestige' if that's something you're really worried about and then pick it. My money's on QMUL personally, but Southampton is another great choice for science. When you're there, just work hard, make sure you get a 2:1 or a 1st and then I'm sure you'll do well. Remember: it's not so much about the university that you attended as it is what you make of the experience and the degree. The universities you've listed are really good ones.
Reply 19
Everyone is going for unis that are best for career prospects regardless of subject,what's best for them etc i think. Plus I think more are staying closer to home. Russell group or nothing for many now plus a lifetime of extortionate taxation. To put it into perspective the value of a degree is declining year on year I think because of market saturation and the price is rapidly increasing. For most getting into a reputable top uni is now essential. Market forces are at work!


Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 11 years ago)

Latest

Trending

Trending