The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by uktotalgamer
How on earth is it not their choice to be a tosspot? How? Explain me that please because I really would love to know. "Oh damn, I really shouldn't punch this defenceless drunk person but Cameron would hate it if I didn't"...

You having a laugh mate or what?

And I'd invest in the prison system. Tell them if they don't buck their ideas up that's where they are going. Get them doing jobs such as keeping streets clean etc so that we wouldn't need immigrants to come in and do the shit jobs... But I'm not a fool, this would be a lot harder than it sounds. We'd need a radical change in attitude in society.


Their primary and secondary socialisation determines their decision-making. We are not all in the same position to make identical judgements. They're not choosing, societal structure has chosen for them.
Original post by tu_es_jolie_x
The issue with benefits isn't how much people get but the number of people getting them. I do agree with you though, whilst I think the benefit system is essential, it does need a dramatic overhaul.


As for 'chavs' it just annoys me how for some reason our society seems to enjoy rewarding people for bad behaviour. It's like oh you enjoy engaging in anti-social behaviour, let me send you to all these places to keep you from getting bored and doing it again. Yet young people that haven't done anything wrong in there life get nothing.


How on Earth is criminal punishment a reward?
Original post by Barksy
It would be a kick up the arse for them to get themselves to work and take things seriously as soon as they realise the public aren't funding their lifestyle anymore.


It would never conclude in this 'realisation'. If anything, it would result in retreatist criminality.
I'm quite worried about some right-wing chavs, I think they're called 'UKIP'.
Reply 84
Original post by midnightice
Hmmm...
We have a welfare system for a reason - fundamental morals. Without benefits, these people would be left in severe detriment, especially as our work-shy culture still thrives. There can be no U-turn on welfare. Our country would face a moral outrage. We don't live in a hunter/gatherer society; we have to look after those who are disadvantaged.


We have a bloated welfare system for a reason - a hangover from Labour's power hungry bid to buy votes. As for morals, is it moral a single mother who works 9-5 has to part with her hard-earned money to fund a degenerate drug-abuser's comfortable life with his HD TV and 12 kids? I would argue not.

What is really wrong with the UK is the entitlement culture; it explains chavs and it explains those deranged left-wingers who flock to their defence.
Reply 85
Original post by Barksy
It would be a kick up the arse for them to get themselves to work and take things seriously as soon as they realise the public aren't funding their lifestyle anymore.


It doesn't work like that. All it would do is make even more of them turn into criminals and thugs to get what they want, especially when they have few employable skills and unemployment is already high. It also punishes claimants who aren't involved in that kind of behaviour, creating more anger in those groups and heightening the likelihood they will start acting up too. More sink estates, more economic inequality, more criminals. These things are all undeniably linked.

You can accept the truth of that without having to start treating thugs as victims. They are still a product of their economically and morally deprived environment - the more you try to push them down the less they will act like you.
Original post by Barksy
We have a bloated welfare system for a reason - a hangover from Labour's power hungry bid to buy votes. As for morals, is it moral a single mother who works 9-5 has to part with her hard-earned money to fund a degenerate drug-abuser's comfortable life with his HD TV and 12 kids? I would argue not.

What is really wrong with the UK is the entitlement culture; it explains chavs and it explains those deranged left-wingers who flock to their defence.


Would you rather the 'entitlement culture' or extreme poverty and eventual mass death of the poor? This might be an exaggeration, but when stripping away welfare what else is there left?
Reply 87
First of all, it's not just in the UK, "chavs" exist in countless other countries, they're just called differently. To "get rid" of them you'd have to first get rid of social and economic disparity/inequality, so chavs are still here to stay for a while.
Original post by Lala_1234
Most chavs are given an education, but believe they don't need it, as in most cases their parents will have dropped out of school and are living off of benefits.
What the country needs to do is re-think its benefits system so that people can only have benefits for a limited amount of time.
Or, have a benefits card so that the council can monitor what they are spending their money on (e.g. alot of people living off of benefits have HUGE tv's, the newest iPhone, and smoke and/or drink etc. All of these are luxuries, they do not need them)



PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me how people manage this!

Since my Dad was made redundant my family have gone without all luxury items as we simply can barely afford the bills! I'm always hearing about how people have all the best clothes and phones and TV's but on benefits you get enough to some of the bills and buy food. that is is, everything else either comes out of savings that my dad had accumulated over the years (yeah he's worked all his life but all people on benefits are lazy scumbag shirkers right? at least thats according to everyone on TSR) or from my own weekend job. I have a £10 Alcatel Phone that I can barely afford to top up. I havent had new clothes in over a year and my parents havent been able to afford to go to their local club and see their friends. So please let me know how to get all this money from benefits cause where I'm standing there is none!
Original post by Barksy
We have a bloated welfare system for a reason - a hangover from Labour's power hungry bid to buy votes. As for morals, is it moral a single mother who works 9-5 has to part with her hard-earned money to fund a degenerate drug-abuser's comfortable life with his HD TV and 12 kids? I would argue not.

What is really wrong with the UK is the entitlement culture; it explains chavs and it explains those deranged left-wingers who flock to their defence.


'Chavs' have undeniably been failed by successive governments, but a cutback in welfare/benefits could only possibly work if significant investment was made in education, allowing people who actually want to change their situation to do so. Removing benefits and hoping that everything gets better obviously isn't going to work.
Reply 90
Original post by midnightice
Would you rather the 'entitlement culture' or extreme poverty and eventual mass death of the poor? This might be an exaggeration, but when stripping away welfare what else is there left?


I wouldn't say it's an exaggeration. It's just that instead of mass death, it leads to total breakdown of society and possibly even rebellion. Which I guess can lead to death in the form of extreme protests/clashes the likes of which we see in undeveloped third world countries. I'd rather not.
Reply 91
Original post by Redolent
You can accept the truth of that without having to start treating thugs as victims. They are still a product of their economically and morally deprived environment - the more you try to push them down the less they will act like you.


It seems the major gulf in opinion here is between those who believe in personal responsibility and those who blame everyone else for an individual's problem. Chavs act like they do through choice; whether that is down to their probable stupidity or their area is irrelevant. Stop blaming everyone but them.

Only on here could people defend such a skid-mark on society.
Reply 92
Original post by ArtGoblin
I wouldn't say so. While there are plenty of working class people who don't want to be tainted by the label 'chav' (understandably) so they shout about how it only applies to certain behaviours and how they're working class and they HATE chavs, I think most of the 'chavs are scum and its OK to say that because rich people can be chavs too' stuff comes from middle class people who have only really associated with middle class people. There is a lot more chav hatred on TSR (middle class hub) than there is in my (fairly deprived) home city, although that could be because this is the internet rather than real life.


Spot on.

A forum full of middle class students hating on "chavs". Class conflict writ small.
Original post by Redolent
I wouldn't say it's an exaggeration. It's just that instead of mass death, it leads to total breakdown of society and possibly even rebellion. Which I guess can lead to death in the form of extreme protests/clashes the likes of which we see in undeveloped third world countries. I'd rather not.


Exactly. It all boils down to this. Obviously the Government have reached such conclusions for us and that is why we have the welfare state.
Original post by Kibalchich
Like Gina Rhinehart? or Richard Branson? People like that you mean? Do me a fucking favour.


Yes, they've all started from the bottom doing hard graft setting up their businesses. They've worked hard so why shouldn't they profit now? Seems perfectly reasonable to me!
Reply 95
Original post by uktotalgamer
It's a drain on the UK, it's a drain on society, it's a drain on our culture. It's just awful.

Most anti social crimes in the UK are committed by these morons, lets be tougher on them!

They stand for the "working class"? No they don't. I'm working class and I despise them.

It's about time we clamped down on these scumbags. All they do is drink or do drugs. They don't have jobs. The way they go on is appalling. It's time we clamped down.

Oh, and the thing that annoys me. "Oh, they need a cuddle. They just need support." No they don't. They need a kick up the arse. They need a prison sentance. They need a reality check.

These people are ruining this country by playing the "were working class" card.


You'z got Daily Mail syndrome?

So you hate poor / working class people and are generalising those who wear sports wear brands as criminals? You'd probably be surprised that other people commit crimes too and if you looked through the prisons there'd be a fiar amount of middle class people in there too.

What confuses me about your post is that surely most working class people wear sports brands or similar and therefore they are all "chavs" and "criminals" to you.

The fact certain people do those activities my friend is because of the poverty trap. They are raised in a community where there are little or no opportunities to do much other than get a low skilled job or where many are unemployed, therefore they need support to get out of the trap and be encouraged to follow through with their education so they can go to Uni > job > out of the trap.

Anyway, what your post spells out is not that you're angry with sports brands-wearing people or even the working class, but rather criminals instead, who could be from any background or class.

Criminals commit crimes, yes. You could have just posted a thread saying I hate criminals which would have sufficed but no you've made me write my new novel out on thestudentroom.

Bottom line: don't stereotype and avoid prejudice kids!
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 96
Original post by Barksy
It seems the major gulf in opinion here is between those who believe in personal responsibility and those who blame everyone else for an individual's problem. Chavs act like they do through choice; whether that is down to their probable stupidity or their area is irrelevant. Stop blaming everyone but them.

Only on here could people defend such a skid-mark on society.


I'm not "defending them" or "blaming everyone else" and you have completely failed to address the established truths behind what I was saying. As I said, those factors are undeniably linked and your "solution" serves only to worsen the problem.

People are, to a large extent, a product of their environments, whether it fits in with your narrow conception of how the world works or not. Neither of us like "chavs", and I've made it pretty clear that I don't. It's just that I don't deny the factors that lead to people becoming chavs, which are abundantly clear. You should throw the criminals in jail, sure, but don't act like you'll get rid of that kind of criminal by making the places they tend to come from into even bigger shitholes.
Reply 97
Original post by venenecinema
'Chavs' have undeniably been failed by successive governments, but a cutback in welfare/benefits could only possibly work if significant investment was made in education, allowing people who actually want to change their situation to do so. Removing benefits and hoping that everything gets better obviously isn't going to work.


To be honest I couldn't really care less if reducing benefits improved their plight or not (I still think it is worthwhile doing). The fact is others shouldn't be paying for their lifestyle. Call that immoral or whatever, but they chose to be that way. I don't buy into this collectivist bullshit. They made their bed and should lie in it.

Education is accessible to everyone; they are either too stupid or don't take it seriously. Again, not the fault of anyone but themselves.
Reply 98
Original post by hothedgehog
Yes, they've all started from the bottom doing hard graft setting up their businesses. They've worked hard so why shouldn't they profit now? Seems perfectly reasonable to me!


No they haven't. Gina Rhinehart inherited the business and has never been down a mine in her life. Branson came from a wealthy family and went to a public school.
Reply 99
Original post by Redolent
I'm not "defending them" or "blaming everyone else" and you have completely failed to address the established truths behind what I was saying. As I said, those factors are undeniably linked and your "solution" serves only to worsen the problem.

People are, to a large extent, a product of their environments, whether it fits in with your narrow conception of how the world works or not. Neither of us like "chavs", and I've made it pretty clear that I don't. It's just that I don't deny the factors that lead to people becoming chavs, which are abundantly clear. You should throw the criminals in jail, sure, but don't act like you'll get rid of that kind of criminal by making the places they tend to come from into even bigger shitholes.


So, rather than reducing the amount we subsidise them, are you saying we should spend more? It is the throwing of money at these people which expands their numbers and keeps them unemployed. If not then I don't know what purpose your attack on me has had.

Latest

Trending

Trending