How many people believe the Boston Bombing suspect is actually innocent?

I was surprised at the amount of people that do. There have been relentless tweets about his innocence. I've been looking into it, and I never made a conclusion. But now I do think things are a bit odd. What happened to being 'innocent untill proven guilty'. With Dzhokhar, it's the other way round. He's guilty untill proven innocent.

Is there any solid proof that he (and his brother) carried out the attacks?

I'm merely interested and curious. I believe in justice, and whoever committed the atrocity should be punished accordingly.

But what if they've got the wrong guy? I'm not a conspiracist, just a skeptic. Especially of the media reporting today.

Would like peoples thoughts, if there are any people who do adamantly believe he is innocent and others who believe the exact opposite, tell us why!

I'll believe he is guilty when I see evidence more than a few grainy pictures. For the amount of stuff that supposedly has happened there is very little CCTV being released. Something about the whole thing just doesn't sit right with me.

I also have a strong feeling this was mostly the older brother, if he is found guilty.

Posted from TSR Mobile

People find it hard to believe you are innocent when you are seen on CCTV planting bombs, get involved in a gunfight with police, shoot an officer and are found hiding in someone's garden

He supposedly phoned his uncle yesterday from the hospital, saying "Forgive me"?

I thought he couldn't speak due to the wound in his throat?

To me, personally, I'm impartial. But I've got a gut instinct. That he perhaps isn't as guilty as it is made out, or that there is a whole other story to it which we are not being told. There's been various other pictures of people on their cell phones during the time the bomb went off and with backpacks. Also, the fact that 'The Craft' vans were already present during the scene before the bombs went off. I'm not saying I'm totally Alex Jones but I definately believe his questions are valid and do need addressing. He posts his opinions on infowars.com

You are going to have to overlook a lot of things to conclude that he had no part in it.

* He was photographed on the scene with his brother and then fled with his brother, running him over with his vehicle.

* His actions in hiding from the police and then shooting himself to try to evade capture.

* Presumably there will be good forensics linking him to the bomb preparation and delivery.

* His own admissions - presumably more will come out on that.

I agree that he was probably strongly influenced by the older brother but that does not mean that as a 19-yr old he was not responsible for his actions.

I am against the death penalty on principle so wouldn't support it in this case, but there seems to be little question as to his guilt.

I'm just not as quick to believe the media as others. I'm unsure really, maybe he is guilty but the reporting on this one is dodgy as hell which makes me suspicious and so now I'm just questioning the whole thing. I'll form a more solid opinion as the case progresses.

There were some errors made in the chaos of the early reports, but the evidence that the two brothers were involved is overwhelming. The conspiracy theories on the topic are coming from extremist Islamic sources.

Alex Jones is an extremist Islamic source? lololol

Until I actually see CCTV of him planting the bomb I will view him as an innocent man.

Well, you can believe any old rubbish, that doesn't make it either true or relevant.

At this moment of time, neither you nor me, has seen any CCTV of him placing the bombs. Until we have, your view point is as strong (or weak) as mine. The media reporting something doesn't constitute evidence to me.