China rep election

i feel this could be a close one.
Just so long as you both stay away from my SC seat -_-

We will have to see (Jokes). It would take time to make observations and improvements

I don't believe that the Security Council elections are a good idea. We try to emulate the actual UN so I believe the P5/6 members should be kept as they are as they hold the most political and international sway in the world, it doesn't make sense for a smaller, less developed country to hold such an important role.
I like Morgsie's idea of furthering representation but I do believe that the traditional P5/6 members should be kept the same.

This is a very difficult decision. Both candidates have very good manifestos. I do think biannual elections over 3-4 weeks for SC members is a good idea to an extent (excellent for dealing with lack of activity when no reason for it has been given). However, as Superunknown said, it doesn't necessarily represent the actual UN. Although, Qwertish is the only one to pass a resolution this year and I do feel that more resolutions should be encouraged (if necessary/possible) and I have a feeling that Qwertish could help promote that more, especially if given a more serious position.
However, Ry. sounds appealing to me as well since he has gained so much in 3 months and someone relatively new to the MUN gaining a SC place does sound interesting.

A truly tough decision. Best of luck to both of you though!

This is a very difficult decision. Both candidates have very good manifestos. I do think biannual elections over 3-4 weeks for SC members is a good idea to an extent (excellent for dealing with lack of activity when no reason for it has been given). However, as Superunknown said, it doesn't necessarily represent the actual UN. Although, Qwertish is the only one to pass a resolution this year and I do feel that more resolutions should be encouraged (if necessary/possible) and I have a feeling that Qwertish could help promote that more, especially if given a more serious position.
However, Ry. sounds appealing to me as well since he has gained so much in 3 months and someone relatively new to the MUN gaining a SC place does sound interesting.

A truly tough decision. Best of luck to both of you though!

This is a very difficult decision. Both candidates have very good manifestos. I do think biannual elections over 3-4 weeks for SC members is a good idea to an extent (excellent for dealing with lack of activity when no reason for it has been given). However, as Superunknown said, it doesn't necessarily represent the actual UN. Although, Qwertish is the only one to pass a resolution this year and I do feel that more resolutions should be encouraged (if necessary/possible) and I have a feeling that Qwertish could help promote that more, especially if given a more serious position.
However, Ry. sounds appealing to me as well since he has gained so much in 3 months and someone relatively new to the MUN gaining a SC place does sound interesting.

A truly tough decision. Best of luck to both of you though!

But this begs the question, who did thou vote for?

That's my little secret . I might not have voted yet, who knows

I want to introduce fixed terms for SC reps. Basically, every six months, all SC seats are put up for election. If a new rep defeats the old rep in the election, they swap seats.

I proposed the very same thing when I was elected to India six months ago, maybe we can work on this resolution together?

Anyway, you have my vote.

Sure, what are your thoughts on the proposal from a few posts ago?

Aye, I remember agreeing with your proposals way back when, as I do now. Didn't have to work too hard did I ? If you need anyone to second it as a resolution or charter amendment, then you can count in India (if it needs to be a nation) or me (if it is the participant)..(cbb to check at the minute )

I still dislike all this talk of ousting SC members, i had to wait over a year for mine having monthly elections will simple cause a cluster ****er within the MuN, besides activity is hardly good ebough at current i mean we have one person having to rep two SC members...

Who said anything about monthly? I'm suggesting twice a year... Admittedly activity is rather too low to allow any kind of decent turnout...