The Student Room Group

Rate these girls out of 10?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60
Original post by hrvyspctr
Not your post. Your avatar. Thatcher, Thatcher the Milk Snatcher.


She didn't want to remove it at first.
Reply 61
Original post by ddaappoo
????


LIKE I knows it me be 'are for you to understand but youz as been and done a picture of untermensch on ur avatar.
Reply 62
Original post by Iron Lady
She didn't want to remove it at first.


I know, I am joking. I am a Thatcherite.
Original post by hrvyspctr
How dare you objectify these women by assigning them a number?

I think the black haired one is ****ing ugly, and the blonde is tasty - yum yum.

Almost as contradictory as feminism. Yarp.


why u think that they are ugly
Reply 64
Original post by auga
You're a feminist, but you like Tyrion Lannister? :confused:


Why does the little ****er go running 'round like a little ferrett slashing vaginas with a sickle? I don't watch Game of Thrones.
Reply 65
Original post by Tyrion_Lannister
Check my thread on feminism for my view on objectification, it's in the OP so I cba to retype it but basically objectification in certain settings is fine but reducing people to nothing but sexual objects is not. Stealing someone's photos and posting them online asking for ratings on their attractiveness is not cool. If they are porn actresses, then fine, but I thought oP had stolen them from someone's facebook and stuck them here without permission. Which wouldn't be okay...


They're clearly modells or something... and regardless; if their photos are so easily accessible on the internet that they can be redistributed on an internet forum, then they can expect exactly that to happen...

This is such BS... You can't dictate when people are allowed to be horny and when they're not... When they're allowed to judge women based purely on looks and when they can't... And note I say women because your quest for equality clearly only extends to your own gender... Men are objectified just as much as women but you choose to ignore it.
I don't see anything wrong with being objectified myself. But I do think if your 'campaign' extended beyond any motivation other than a slight inferiority complex then you'd recognise this.

What's more, if girls post photos such as these online then what do you expect people to do? Sit down and discuss how intelligent they look?

As per, it seems with feminists, you're living in your ideologue bubble which needs to be popped so you can get a reality check... Modern feminists would be an embarrassment to the suffragettes... Why campaign for the banning of Page 3 when you could be extending feminism to those who actually need it? Countries and cultures where women genuinely are oppressed? Instead of trying to remove the rights that we should be celebrating in order to impose your perfect view of society upon everyone, you could be extending those rights to women who aren't given any alternative to covering themselves head to toe...

/rant.
Reply 66
Original post by keep smilling
why u think that they are ugly


First one is a bit of a skank.

Second is ****ing gorgeous. Would marry in a heartbeat despite her occupation.
I was just about to say they look like porn stars..
Reply 68
Original post by Tyrion_Lannister
Yes, because I'm sure these women would just love to know what men on an internet forum think of their appearance. I'm sure they're just dying to be objectified like this. :colonhash:


They're porn stars you feminist tool.
Reply 69
Original post by hrvyspctr
Not your post. Your avatar. Thatcher, Thatcher the Milk Snatcher.


I'm sure so many children died of dehydration because of that.
Reply 70
Original post by ed-
They're clearly modells or something... and regardless; if their photos are so easily accessible on the internet that they can be redistributed on an internet forum, then they can expect exactly that to happen...

This is such BS... You can't dictate when people are allowed to be horny and when they're not... When they're allowed to judge women based purely on looks and when they can't... And note I say women because your quest for equality clearly only extends to your own gender... Men are objectified just as much as women but you choose to ignore it.
I don't see anything wrong with being objectified myself. But I do think if your 'campaign' extended beyond any motivation other than a slight inferiority complex then you'd recognise this.

What's more, if girls post photos such as these online then what do you expect people to do? Sit down and discuss how intelligent they look?

As per, it seems with feminists, you're living in your ideologue bubble which needs to be popped so you can get a reality check... Modern feminists would be an embarrassment to the suffragettes... Why campaign for the banning of Page 3 when you could be extending feminism to those who actually need it? Countries and cultures where women genuinely are oppressed? Instead of trying to remove the rights that we should be celebrating in order to impose your perfect view of society upon everyone, you could be extending those rights to women who aren't given any alternative to covering themselves head to toe...

/rant.


How about they just campaign against Islam and it's oppression to women? Brace yourself, wee kiddos. I is gonna get banned if I talk any longer. CONTROVERSIAL NATURE OF THREAD HAS SKYROCKETED.
Original post by CJKay
They're porn stars you feminist tool.

I've already explained I thought he nicked them off someone's facebook you illiterate tool
Reply 72
Original post by CJKay
They're porn stars you feminist tool.


Little too late, CJ.

Original post by minthumbugs
I was just about to say they look like porn stars..


Yeah. Off you go now.

Original post by ed-
I'm sure so many children died of dehydration because of that.


Yeah. They ended up bringing in cows so the kids could suck on their udders. Or in Bradford's case, Dorothy the dinner lady used to breast feed 'em.
Reply 73
Original post by Tyrion_Lannister
I've already explained I thought he nicked them off someone's facebook you illiterate tool


Fail to see what is illiterate about that. By the way, "Facebook" should be capitalised. It's the name of a company, simply stylised in lower-case.
Reply 74
Original post by Tyrion_Lannister
I've already explained I thought he nicked them off someone's facebook you illiterate tool


I think you've just completely misunderstood my use of the word "tool" and used it for yourself as generic insult. Ironic, that illiteracy bit.
Original post by CJKay
I think you've just completely misunderstood my use of the word "tool" and used it for yourself as generic insult. Ironic, that illiteracy bit.

I restylised your sentence and changed it back to you because you misunderstood the intent of my post and instead insulted me. Idiot.
Reply 76
Some harsh marking in here. I reckon i'd get -47. :rave:
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 77
Let's be honest, medieval dwarf Tyrion. Do you really want a woman flying a plane? She may get distracted by make-up and gossiping about the girls and watching sloth videos and getting rampant with her rabbit.
Reply 78
Original post by Ham22
Some harsh marking in here. I reckon i'd get -47. :dance:


Don't be tough on yourself.

I'm sure your a strong -46.
image.jpg

She puts both of them to shame, what do you think boys? Can't even rate her she's just that perfect.

Quick Reply

Latest