Outrage as man walks free after admitting sex with 13 year old.

Its the opposite: the older you get, the more difficult it is to distinguish between young people of similar ages. Some 13 year olds could definitely pass for 16!

The thing is though that the age of consent is thirteen in some perfectly civilised countries. These days Westerners are perfectly mature enough to know whether sex is right for them. I don't advocate braking the law but many young girls do look much older than they are and are sexually forward at a young age. Besides, evolutionarily there is nothing wrong with being sexually attracted to a thirteen year old girl (they are reproductively capable), particularly these days now that westerners go through puberty much earlier and look like adults at an early age. Your just subscribing to social norms about right and wrong. The dude probably didn't cause any damage anyway. People get outraged too much over stuff like this.

She may. But not all thirteen year olds do (and will not understand all the consequences). The law must be arbitrary to protect those who are vulnerable.

I dislike people making snap judgments on court cases based on what they've read online or newspaper without having actually being in that court, listening to the evidences put forth before the judge. It makes my blood boil. They think know everything about the case but they really don't!

Lmao.

This debate is over. The petition signed yesterday by over 30k, proves I was in the right.

The judge has been barred from cases like this - the rally of the people has won, all those who disagree. That's tough

Good game TSR.

I just pity those who thought they knew the court case.

Lmao.

This debate is over. The petition signed yesterday by over 30k, proves I was in the right.

The judge has been barred from cases like this - the rally of the people has won, all those who disagree. That's tough

Good game TSR.

I just pity those who thought they knew the court case.

So much emphasis on the victim being a girl, makes me think that most people wouldn't care as much if it was a 13-year-old boy, which is pretty messed up.

I thought the emphasis was on her being a girl and not a woman, or rather to point out how young she is.

Posted from TSR Mobile

But you didn't know the court case.

I'm confused

Dear --------


''Thank you.In less than three days we made the courts - and the country - sit up and listen that in cases of child abuse: it's never the child's fault.
Sexual abuse is about power. When it happened to me I had no power. Thousands of other women have their power taken away. Yesterday you and 45,000 others stood together and took some of that power back. ''




Oh how I do feel honoured to have brought justice... to the justice system

Change.org.

Lmao.

This debate is over. The petition signed yesterday by over 30k, proves I was in the right.

The judge has been barred from cases like this - the rally of the people has won, all those who disagree. That's tough

Good game TSR.

I just pity those who thought they knew the court case.

Doesn't matter at all. She may very well have wanted to sleep with him. But at thirteen, it is assumed by law that you are not capable of understanding all the potential consequences of having sex. The law does not care a jot if this girl knew every STI under the sun, she was thirteen and therefore supposed to be protected by law.