Hypocritical attitude of males!!!! (some)((pubic hair))

That's a bit silly. "Boobs" on a man aren't as natural as hair on women. The most part of women have hair(armpits, pubic, on legs, arms) but not all men have "man boobs".

Your post doesn't make any sense.

How is it at all hypocritical? Surely it's obvious that each gender finds different thing attractive about the other. For example, boobs are attractive on a woman, but not on a man. Would you say it's hypocritical if the conversation went like this (but about what was attractive rather than unattractive):

Girl posts: Man boobs
Male posts: You don't want a man, you want a slob.

Assuming the male likes boobs on women, why is that hypocritical?

Except boobs naturally occur on a woman. They don't naturally occur on men. Body hair naturally occurs on both men and women.

Anyway, I see what you're trying to say but I don't agree.
Why is it okay for a man to state they don't like body hair, yet when a woman says the same thing, the man says thats wrong? That's what hypocritical.

The ****?

I think Shame-us is attempting a new record for how quickly someone can get to 12 red gems ...some of the other posts are even worse ( my personal favourite http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2466817 )

How is it at all hypocritical? Surely it's obvious that each gender finds different thing attractive about the other. For example, boobs are attractive on a woman, but not on a man. Would you say it's hypocritical if the conversation went like this (but about what was attractive rather than unattractive):

Girl posts: Man boobs
Male posts: You don't want a man, you want a slob.

Assuming the male likes boobs on women, why is that hypocritical?

Man boobs do appear naturally on men. Look around you, there are loads of guys out there with them who haven't had surgery. But this "It's natural so you have to find it attractive" argument is beside the point.

If you made a list of what was attractive in men and what was attractive in women, would you be a hypocrite when you came up with different attributes for each gender?

Every woman has hair (unless she has a medical issue) whereas only overweight men have breasts (unless they are trans or something). The point is that men were being critical towards women for them finding body hair on men unattractive, while at the same time finding body hair on women unattractive themselves. Obviously it's not hypocritical for men who prefer hairy women/aren't as fussed, but it IS hypocritical for men to criticse women for not liking body hair on the opposite sex when they themselves don't like it.

Nobody is saying you HAVE to find it attractive, they're just saying it's something the vast, vast majority of people of sexes naturally have and it's not fair to criticise one sex for not finding said shared feature attractive. It's more like men saying they are attracted to blonde haired women and then criticising women for saying they are attracted to blond haired men. Even if you don't think it's hypocritical, it's a really crappy thing to say - I don't think men would be too happy if I started calling them pedos or something for finding hairless vulvas/labia attractive while at the same time I was demanding my boyfriend be hairless down there (and everywhere perhaps). The fact is nobody should dictate what features someone is allowed to find attractive in the opposite sex.

Man boobs do appear naturally on men. Look around you, there are loads of guys out there with them who haven't had surgery. But this "It's natural so you have to find it attractive" argument is beside the point.

If you made a list of what was attractive in men and what was attractive in women, would you be a hypocrite when you came up with different attributes for each gender?

Can someone not point out that such features are attractive for the different groups of men/women/boys/girls? I wouldn't be a hypocrite to say that being 'bouncy' (talkative, energetic and so on) would be attractive for a girl but would be at least slightly weird for a woman. I'm no expert on what exactly goes with what, but ask a fashion expert and they'll give you a whole reel of differences in what men, women, boys and girls can wear and appear attractive.

With the example of hair, it's generally accepted that it's a no-no for females and males going for a boyish look, and a yes for grown men. Your paedophile argument might hold water if the question weren't directed at the generally young group of users of this site, but I don't think you can really accuse the male poster the OP refers to of accusing the female poster of being a paedophile.

I'm no expert on what exactly goes with what, but ask a fashion expert and they'll give you a whole reel of differences in what men, women, boys and girls can wear and appear attractive.
With the example of hair, it's generally accepted that it's a no-no for females and males going for a boyish look, and a yes for grown men.

I knew you'd say something like that. I have to remember to be ridiculously specific on TSR. Large breasts do not occur naturally in men. Women have bigger breasts than men, naturally.
When did I say you had to like it because it's natural?
You've entirely misunderstood. I'm not saying that you have to find it attractive. I'm stating that its hypocritical to say that a 'men not liking body hair is okay but women not liking body hair isn't'.

You're missing the point. I'm saying that it's hypocritical for a man that dislikes body hair to protest when a woman say they aren't attracted to body hair. I don't understand how preferences of different genders is relevant here...

Please point out where I accused that male poster of calling others paedophiles? Mainly because I wasn't and that thought never actually crossed my mind until you mentioned it just then. Although because I'm an adult so someone telling me that because I don't like body hair on men I prefer 'boys' could actually be taken as that, now you've mentioned it. It's not an 'argument' towards the members of this site lol

Yes, and that's bull**** from society imo, but I was under the impression we weren't debating what is 'socially acceptable' but judging others on their individual preferences. Like I really don't care what a fashion expert says because I'm not gonna suddenly find armpit hair attractive on men because it's the social norm/makes men appear attractive and it's unfair of men to judge me for not liking body hair on men.

(Although while we are on the point, fair enough men and women have both been socialised into thinking body hair on women (but not on men) is 'gross' and 'disgusting' and 'unhygienic'(although that doesn't even make sense) but I still think it's hypocriticical to judge someone for liking a feature you yourself find attractive. Like it works both ways for me - if a man likes hairy women, it'd be hypocritical for me to judge him for that while finding hairy men attractive. To be it's like men criticising women for swearing (because it's not 'lady like') and then swearing themselves. I dunno, perhaps you can argue it's not hypocrisy and it would only be hypocritical if it applied to the same sex (e.g men saying women should find hairy men attractive and then themselves wanting men to be hairless) but you can't really deny it's bull**** double standards or something)

I get the feeling we're not on the same wavelength here, we seem to be talking about slightly different issues...

I actually quite like pubic hair on girls.

Oddly, my upper body is largely hairless but my legs are pretty hairy especially the back of my thighs.

apart from my head and armpits, the only particularly hairy part of my upper body is a tail line leading from my pubes to my belly button.

Is this weird?

Because i'm 21 years old, have slept with a number of women in excess of 3-quarters of my age, and my bank balance reads in excess of £600,000.

Relative to other males on this website, I am the epitome.

I actually quite like pubic hair on girls.

Oddly, my upper body is largely hairless but my legs are pretty hairy especially the back of my thighs.

apart from my head and armpits, the only particularly hairy part of my upper body is a tail line leading from my pubes to my belly button.

Is this weird?