The Student Room Group

Those threatening Chinese and their spies....

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Fullofsurprises
It isn't just the power station, Cameron was eager to sell HS2 to them originally (they declined the offer) and Osborne has also been welcoming Chinese banks to London to operate in an unregulated way here.


He's not selling HS2 to the Chinese and even if he did. So what?

Are you promoting protectionist policies?

Do you want a trade war? Do you not want British companies to trade in China?
Original post by Fullofsurprises
Not sure if you're missing the point? I wasn't suggesting that the main issue is a security threat because of their investment in (and control of) our nuclear power - although a reasonable person might wonder about that. I was suggesting that it's bizarre that at the same time as Cameron and Osborne are on a glorious mission to sell our assets to China and treat them as best buddies, they at the same time trust them so little that they cannot use electronic devices made there.

Also, we keep being told that 'Chinese nuclear expertise' will play a part in the new power station, so presumably that will include Chinese staff onsite and Chinese plans and equipment? Made in China?

I am not sure we should be rushing in to the grand scheme to sell the UK to China and introduce Chinese-style labour conditions here (another clear Tory plan) without at least some consideration.


So you've managed to try and turn this into an Anti Tory Rant. How unlike you.
Reply 42
Original post by Fullofsurprises
Well, if it's rubbish, it was the Telegraph article that was rubbish, as I was quoting it.

The fear that China, by buying into our nuclear industry, might in the future have the potential to do us harm, does not seem completely unreasonable to me. I can easily imagine that they will seek to build on this to gain further access to key utilities here. He who pays the piper calls the tune and I don't see why this should be any different - statements can be made now, plans laid down and contract terms established, but who knows how it will be run and administered in 10, 20 and 30 years time?

Given the wholly unaccountable, undemocratic and corrupt nature of the current Chinese government, it is also reasonable to be deeply sceptical about their ability to behave honourably towards us, or to have good motives. I'm not saying that out of the box they will seek to abuse this relationship, but it doesn't inspire confidence. Neither does the zeal with which our Tory leaders are apparently desperate to give away key bits of UK interest to them, all the time lost in admiration for their slave labour-based economy.


So... allow me to enlighten you about this thing called money. In the business world, when someone gives you money, they expect something in return. This exchange of money for things is usually written in a contract. When you break a contract, bad things happen.

It's in China's interest to fulfil the contract, otherwise their investment goes down the toilet and they lose money. The vast majority of the investment is CapEx, so it won't be China's responsibility to operate the plant anyway. They're financing the construction. EDF in the UK are running the plant and are contracted to meet the standards laid out by the UK regulators, and EDF have to make good on their commitments, or they end up in court and all over the press.

The Chinese labour/human rights issue isn't really relevant here. The Chinese are one of the most cash-rich banks in town and the government has given the green light for these investors to add their backing to EDF's plan. This is pretty simple economics - sure the Chinese will make a profit from this, but that's capitalism. Without this investment, we wouldn't be building this plant - nor would we have the jobs it'll create, or the energy security we desperately need.
Original post by Mad Vlad
So... allow me to enlighten you about this thing called money. In the business world, when someone gives you money, they expect something in return. This exchange of money for things is usually written in a contract. When you break a contract, bad things happen.

It's in China's interest to fulfil the contract, otherwise their investment goes down the toilet and they lose money. The vast majority of the investment is CapEx, so it won't be China's responsibility to operate the plant anyway. They're financing the construction. EDF in the UK are running the plant and are contracted to meet the standards laid out by the UK regulators, and EDF have to make good on their commitments, or they end up in court and all over the press.

The Chinese labour/human rights issue isn't really relevant here. The Chinese are one of the most cash-rich banks in town and the government has given the green light for these investors to add their backing to EDF's plan. This is pretty simple economics - sure the Chinese will make a profit from this, but that's capitalism. Without this investment, we wouldn't be building this plant - nor would we have the jobs it'll create, or the energy security we desperately need.


You're just taking an extremely cynical and exploitative position, that it doesn't matter how China makes its money, what sort of abusive and disgraceful government it has, how degraded its own population - so long as they have money and can invest it here.

I find it utterly intriguing and incredibly revealing how Tories are lining up to praise the 'communist' government of China because they now have money. Lost in admiration for their banned trade unions, abolished human rights, forced student labour, non-existent social care and rampant pollution, the Tory Right is eager to have Britain join them.
Original post by MatureStudent36
He's not selling HS2 to the Chinese and even if he did. So what?

Are you promoting protectionist policies?

Do you want a trade war? Do you not want British companies to trade in China?


He tried to interest them in HS2 previously and they turned it down.

The protectionism point is nonsense - where is the level playing field? Should we really be trying to out-compete a country with zero labour protection, incredibly low wages and massive forced labour, or allowing the profits that accrue from that to gain control of our key strategic industries?
Original post by Fullofsurprises
You're just taking an extremely cynical and exploitative position, that it doesn't matter how China makes its money, what sort of abusive and disgraceful government it has, how degraded its own population - so long as they have money and can invest it here.

I find it utterly intriguing and incredibly revealing how Tories are lining up to praise the 'communist' government of China because they now have money. Lost in admiration for their banned trade unions, abolished human rights, forced student labour, non-existent social care and rampant pollution, the Tory Right is eager to have Britain join them.


They're growing we'll though because of it and improving the lives of it's citizens in the process.

What's student labour?
Reply 46
Original post by Fullofsurprises
You're just taking an extremely cynical and exploitative position, that it doesn't matter how China makes its money, what sort of abusive and disgraceful government it has, how degraded its own population - so long as they have money and can invest it here.

I find it utterly intriguing and incredibly revealing how Tories are lining up to praise the 'communist' government of China because they now have money. Lost in admiration for their banned trade unions, abolished human rights, forced student labour, non-existent social care and rampant pollution, the Tory Right is eager to have Britain join them.


Perhaps we should re-nationalise everything and reinstate the National Electricity Board? They did a great job keeping the lights on. :rolleyes:

We're out of other options. All the "ethical" countries are as bankrupt as we are.
Original post by Fullofsurprises
He tried to interest them in HS2 previously and they turned it down.

The protectionism point is nonsense - where is the level playing field? Should we really be trying to out-compete a country with zero labour protection, incredibly low wages and massive forced labour, or allowing the profits that accrue from that to gain control of our key strategic industries?


Well you are advocating protectionist policies by saying we shouldn't do business with them.

China out competes only many levels. Labour costs is one of them. Productivity is another. But because of them they've developed the country immensely. Or would you just prefer to keep non whites in poverty?


how are they gaining control of our key industries?

edit. Are you aware that with increasing labour rates in china British industry is now becoming more viable. Reshoring is the new buzz word in industry.
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by MatureStudent36
They're growing we'll though because of it and improving the lives of it's citizens in the process.

What's student labour?


Foxconn uses forced student interns, 'supplied' by colleges as conscripts.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/forced-labout-china-economic-miracle
Original post by Mad Vlad
Perhaps we should re-nationalise everything and reinstate the National Electricity Board? They did a great job keeping the lights on. :rolleyes:

We're out of other options. All the "ethical" countries are as bankrupt as we are.


Actually the nationalised electricity setup in the UK, setting aside the issue of miner's strikes, was significantly better at keeping the lights on - there have been many more non-strike related power cuts under privatisation than before.

However, the key issues are that power was cheaper in real terms to the end consumer then (arguably it was produced from cheap coal, admittedly) and most importantly that there was proper long-term national and strategic forward planning over multiple decades. The privatised mess left behind by the Thatcher and Major governments is incapable of generating such plans and the results will soon be with us, with rota cuts predicted as soon as this winter.
Original post by Fullofsurprises
Foxconn uses forced student interns, 'supplied' by colleges as conscripts.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/forced-labout-china-economic-miracle


Somebody seems to have a burr up their arse about unpaid interns. You want a job, you need experience.
Original post by MatureStudent36
Well you are advocating protectionist policies by saying we shouldn't do business with them.

China out competes only many levels. Labour costs is one of them. Productivity is another. But because of them they've developed the country immensely. Or would you just prefer to keep non whites in poverty?


I would prefer that non-whites, like whites, are given the democracy and accountable government that so many of them want so desperately and are denied. I would also prefer that right wing governments from privileged countries like Britain actually practise what they preach and advocate that democracy for them, rather than turning a massive blind eye to all the abuse in the interests of getting some cash.

All the evidence of history is that we should side with the oppressed people of China, not with their brutal, corrupt oligarchic and kleptocratic rulers. When (inevitably) revolution comes again to China, probably in the not to distant future, we can only hope that the people who replace them achieve more democracy and that (hopefully) they don't hate us too much for siding with their hated overlords.

For further information, see World, Arab - dictatorships and the way the west supported them.
Original post by Fullofsurprises
Actually the nationalised electricity setup in the UK, setting aside the issue of miner's strikes, was significantly better at keeping the lights on - there have been many more non-strike related power cuts under privatisation than before.

However, the key issues are that power was cheaper in real terms to the end consumer then (arguably it was produced from cheap coal, admittedly) and most importantly that there was proper long-term national and strategic forward planning over multiple decades. The privatised mess left behind by the Thatcher and Major governments is incapable of generating such plans and the results will soon be with us, with rota cuts predicted as soon as this winter.



LMFAO!!!!!!


Even without a miners strike putting us on a three day working week and rolling brown outs it was no where near as efficient as it is now. I remember pre privatisation power cuts being a not uncommon occurrence with at least two power cuts a year. These days you rarely get them.
Reply 53
Original post by Fullofsurprises
He tried to interest them in HS2 previously and they turned it down.


Yes, I too agree that it's utterly despicable that we ask a country that runs the world's two fastest train services how to run a high speed train network.
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by Fullofsurprises
I would prefer that non-whites, like whites, are given the democracy and accountable government that so many of them want so desperately and are denied. I would also prefer that right wing governments from privileged countries like Britain actually practise what they preach and advocate that democracy for them, rather than turning a massive blind eye to all the abuse in the interests of getting some cash.

All the evidence of history is that we should side with the oppressed people of China, not with their brutal, corrupt oligarchic and kleptocratic rulers. When (inevitably) revolution comes again to China, probably in the not to distant future, we can only hope that the people who replace them achieve more democracy and that (hopefully) they don't hate us too much for siding with their hated overlords.

For further information, see World, Arab - dictatorships and the way the west supported them.


You'll generally tend to find that the best way to develop a democracy is to get a stable economy first. Once that happens it'll happen naturally.

Funnily enough though, I haven't heard any Chinese I've studies with over the last two years complain. Then again its difficult to complain about a system that is developing your country.

Western style democracies work in the west. There's huge swathes of the world that aren't ready for a democratic system yet.
Original post by MatureStudent36


Western style democracies work in the west. There's huge swathes of the world that aren't ready for a democratic system yet.


A completely racist position, by the way. Never mind though, its much loved by dictators the world over as an excuse, so you're in good company.
Original post by Fullofsurprises
A completely racist position, by the way. Never mind though, its much loved by dictators the world over as an excuse, so you're in good company.



How's it racist treacle? There are massive cultural differences between Europe, Russia, North Africa, southern Africa, the Middle East, the Far East, South America , south east Asia and Japan.


Clash of civilisations baby. Clash of civilisations.
How did this thread devolve into full-on capitalism bashing?

Original post by Fullofsurprises

I find it utterly intriguing and incredibly revealing how Tories are lining up to praise the 'communist' government of China because they now have money. Lost in admiration for their banned trade unions, abolished human rights, forced student labour, non-existent social care and rampant pollution, the Tory Right is eager to have Britain join them.


They ban trade unions? That explains why they actually have an economy growing at ~8% a year!

But seriously, in your desperation to denigrate any system except a very socialist democracy, you miss a crucial point. The country which has done the most for its poor people in the last two decades is . . . yes, that's right, non-democratic China. In fact the number in poverty in China has been cut from 800 million to less than 200million; 600 million people's lives are infinitely better off. Don't believe the Chinese government? Even the United Nations says so: the millennium poverty goals for 2015, which was to halve global poverty, have already been achieved. Guess which country has contributed over 80% of this reduction.

I wonder why all this poverty reduction only took place after the 80s when they deregulated their economy - we all know social safety nets and trade unionism is how you really improve people's living standards. I also wonder how a non-democratic state has managed to do so much more for its people than democracies like India or Brazil or the Philippines. But by all means, continue to believe that the Chinese are far worse off than any of them - don't let the facts stand in your way.
Reply 58
Original post by Fullofsurprises
A completely racist position, by the way. Never mind though, its much loved by dictators the world over as an excuse, so you're in good company.

That isn't remotely racist. Maybe you should take a look at a proceedings of a Parliament in Taiwan to see what's it like to have a democracy in a country that isn't ready for it.

When a country is developing generally a strong state is required and a democratic form of government may not always be the best.

Ever wondered why Singapore is today a strong and developed economy while the rest of SE Asia with significantly better democratic institutions remain 3rd World?

Original post by Fullofsurprises
I would prefer that non-whites, like whites, are given the democracy and accountable government that so many of them want so desperately and are denied. I would also prefer that right wing governments from privileged countries like Britain actually practise what they preach and advocate that democracy for them, rather than turning a massive blind eye to all the abuse in the interests of getting some cash.



There are very good reasons why most Western countries don't bulldoze their values in China, in fact it is a very simple reason, do so and you are told where the door is and that sets back all your existing trading relationships, are you only happy when your own industries are bankrupt and struggling to survive?

Do you for one think by antagonizing China into democratic reforms it's going to get anywhere other than being told to **** off?
Reply 59
Original post by Fullofsurprises
Well, theoretically at least, the US is a democracy, a fellow member of NATO and a long-time close ally. Perhaps their monitoring of us is like having a friend being over-curious and going through one's bag in the pub when one is visiting the toilet. At least, that's a friendly interpretation.

The government of China, by contrast, has an utter contempt for democracy and is currently, far from liberalising, actually intensifying their vicious internal campaigns against people who dare to speak up against the corruption and mendacity of the ruling Communist Party.

Comically, China is currently trying to become a member of the UN Human Rights Council.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/22/china-challenged-human-rights-un

They continue to disappear people on an industrial scale who raise any of these issues within the country.


Please ... recite more lines from the international aid groups. You act like the perfect puppy, i hope you bark more when the US tells you to.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending