Is National Socialism inherently racist?

I believe it can exist in a state that doesn't require racial descrimination; of course the term has been polluted by German nazism to such an extent where it is simply seen as a racist ideology.

I would like to remember the UK had a NS party before the II world war.

or do it on the basis of blond hair and blue eyes t.

I share your dislike for nationalism, it's important to celebrate your (or your countries accomplishments) to some degree but often nationalism is limiting.

Personally i think the bigger shame is the stain that the Nazi's put on eugenics. While it's wrong to kill those deemed undesirable or do it on the basis of blond hair and blue eyes there is nothing inherently wrong with the goal of creating superior genetic stock, in this day and age that can be done via selective breeding of the smartest people or most healthy or even altering the genome of a child before their birth to weed out certain genes.



Most ideologues are banded as being left or right dependent on their economic stance and in that sense the word socialist is a correct definition given the anti-rich, communist sympathies and heavily taxing, interventionist policies followed by Hitler and the Nazi's. Clearly however their variation of it was substantially different socially when compared to the likes of Marx.

I have to say, posting this type of thing makes us anti-racists look foolish to the educated person. The Nazis never ever said anything about blonde hair and blue eyed master race. It's a myth. Find me evidence from Nazi doctrine to support this. You won't believe me i have looked. Let's keep things to facts.

In fact they were much more interested in occultism and indian spirituality.. they viewed indo-european Aryans as the superior race and considering the history you can't disagree with that.

I don't think what we would call Indians today are what the Nazis were interested in. The theory is that White Europeans populated those lands many thousands of years ago but were blended out of existence through miscegenation so to speak. I believe the Nazis were interested in that part of history.

Yes they did think the so called white people were "superior" but that wasn't just blonde, blue eyed white people-that would have been kind of silly considering most of the high profile Nazis didn't fit that description themselves. You have to keep in mind though, at that time (and lets be honest even today) pretty much all "races" thought their "race" was superior.

They were interested in India:
-they sent SS to Nepal to study ancient hindu books
-Himmler, highest SS general, always carried with him a copy of the Bhagavad Gita
-the Swastika is a Indian spiritual symbol

-the Swastika is a Indian spiritual symbol

Another myth. What you are talking about is really called a "Hakenkreuz". It's of ancient Norse and Germanic origin.

It certainly was used in Europe before, but the origins are from India.

Perhaps (and forgetting about the orientation of the various symbols that are similar in shape that have been found around the world), but as i have said three times already, according to the Nazis and other historians of the time, the people in the area we now called India were not the same people as those that inhabited the lands thousands of years ago--the story is they were white European folk-- if we understand that it kinda makes sense why the Nazis were interested in that geographical area, doesn't it.

Well if the theory of an Indo-European invasion of the Indus Valley is true then I would think current indians come from that civilazation. In fact they have similair racial characteristics to europeans, except the skin color slightly darker because of more sun they have.

In fact they were much more interested in occultism and indian spirituality.. they viewed indo-european Aryans as the superior race and considering the history you can't disagree with that.

The Aryan Invasion theory is also false, quite simply, nothing more to say. It's a way for Europe to feel responsible for Sanskrit, the Vedas and the Indian civilisations. Aryan and Dravidians are not as much of a reality as people believe.

Sources please or is sounds like the work of Indian supremacists.

The Aryan Invasion theory is the work of white supremacists. Show me some proof for this stupid theory. There is no evidence of a mass migration of white people into India.



Posted from TSR Mobile