The Student Room Group

Ethnic minority communities being left by police to 'take law into their own hands'

The Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Tom Winsor, said some ethnic minority communities are turning their backs on the police and rarely, if ever, call them to deal with/investigate crimes, even those as serious as murder, sex crimes and pedophilia, instead dealing with them 'in their own way' (Guardian, 2014)

"There are cities in the Midlands where the police never go because they are never called. They never hear of any trouble because the community deals with that on its own ... They just have their own form of community justice" (Tom Winsor, 2014)

This is what people mean by 'state multiculturalism has failed' (Cameron, 2011). It's time (ivory tower) liberals woke up to what is going on in our towns and cities. The West is turning into The Wild West, even Mr. Winsor went as far as to compare the situation in some parts of the UK to Northern Ireland during 'the Troubles'
(edited 5 years ago)

Scroll to see replies

Very misleading thread title.

There is a significant difference between the police leaving a community to sort itself out and a community refusing to get the police involved.
Reply 2
Original post by Foo.mp3
The Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Tom Winsor, said some ethnic minority communities are turning their backs on the police and rarely, if ever, call them to deal with/investigate crimes, even those as serious as murder, sex crimes and pedophilia, instead dealing with them 'in their own way' (Guardian, 2014)

"There are cities in the Midlands where the police never go because they are never called. They never hear of any trouble because the community deals with that on its own ... They just have their own form of community justice" (Tom Winsor, 2014)

This is what people mean by 'state multiculturalism has failed' (Cameron, 2011). It's time (ivory tower) liberals woke up to what is going on in our towns and cities. The West is turning into The Wild West, even Mr. Winsor went as far as to compare the situation in some parts of the UK to Northern Ireland during 'the Troubles'


I will drive you home and keep you safe FooFoo. :sexface:
Original post by maskofsanity
There is a significant difference between the police leaving a community to sort itself out and a community refusing to get the police involved.


On the other hand it does suggest that the police are tolerating vigilantism. Who exactly in "the community" "deals with that"? Were they elected? Do they assemble juries? Do they require proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt?

This sort of thing can range from benign (immigrants don't call the police because they don't commit or become victims of crimes!) to the deeply sinister (immigrants have established underground states that are excluding the British state from increasingly large areas of the country).

If natives did the latter there would be tanks in the streets.
Reply 4
Yep, the title is completely wrong. They aren't being left by police to be vigilantes, they are simply refusing to use the police.

However in regard to what was said, this is what happens when you have a culture of immigrants who do not wish to integrate with the newly chosen society but instead create a satellite community.
Original post by Observatory
On the other hand it does suggest that the police are tolerating vigilantism. Who exactly in "the community" "deals with that"? Were they elected? Do they assemble juries? Do they require proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt?

This sort of thing can range from benign (immigrants don't call the police because they don't commit or become victims of crimes!) to the deeply sinister (immigrants have established underground states that are excluding the British state from increasingly large areas of the country).

If natives did the latter there would be tanks in the streets.


Yes the issue is how to deal with community-wide vigilantism (which is an incredibly delicate situation and has no simple answer), not that the police are just leaving the community. The community has left the police. It's also worth mentioning that no evidence has been given yet, as shown in the second half of the article which the OP conveniently left out:

But Chris Sims, chief constable of West Midlands police, told the paper there was "no evidence" of crimes being under-reported in the region's minority communities.

Sims added: "The experience of West Midlands police's officers and staff who actively work day in day out with our communities could not be more different than suggested by Mr Winsor, assuming he's referring to West Midlands.

"There is no evidence to suggest that the under reporting of crimes is a significant issue here in the West Midlands and that some communities therefore feel compelled to take the law into their own hands."

He added that areas with a high density of minority communities accounted for high volumes of calls to his force.

home affairs select committee chairman and Leicester MP Keith Vaz said he was concerned by Winsor's claims. He said: "I have represented an inner city Midlands constituency, which is home to many diverse communities, for 26 years and have not seen any evidence to support the idea of a sub culture of secondary justice.

"It is hazardous to suggest that some communities have lost faith with the justice system of this country without providing specific evidence.
Original post by maskofsanity
Yes the issue is how to deal with community-wide vigilantism (which is an incredibly delicate situation and has no simple answer), not that the police are just leaving the community. The community has left the police.

This would explain why the police find it difficult to prosecute ordinary crimes in these areas but not why they are not cracking down on the vigilantes who have taken their place.

It's also worth mentioning that no evidence has been given yet, as shown in the second half of the article which the OP conveniently left out:

At the moment we have two competing claims, one by the Chief Inspector of Police, and another by a Chief Constable who probably stands to lose his job if these claims are substantiated. I suggest that Chief Constable Sim's assertion that the claim cannot be substantiated (note, he did not say it was false) does not settle the matter.
Original post by Observatory
This would explain why the police find it difficult to prosecute ordinary crimes in these areas but not why they are not cracking down on the vigilantes who have taken their place.


The community-wide vigilantism is a trend that has been recognised, which will now lead to discussions and solutions. Cracking down on something takes time - you first need to observe what exactly you are cracking down on! West Midlands police have certainly not observed anything at all. It's very unlikely that the police were consciously acknowledging that communities were not communicating with them and just thought "bah, leave 'em to it!". Rather, a lack of communication and co-operation has resulted in a lack of ability to police certain communities, which now needs to be tackled. Let's also bear in mind the massive and continuous cuts that the police has experienced - their priorities are reported crimes not a quiet community.

Original post by Observatory
At the moment we have two competing claims, one by the Chief Inspector of Police, and another by a Chief Constable who probably stands to lose his job if these claims are substantiated. I suggest that Chief Constable Sim's assertion that the claim cannot be substantiated (note, he did not say it was false) does not settle the matter.


Of course, but there is still no evidence.
Original post by maskofsanity
The community-wide vigilantism is a trend that has been recognised, which will now lead to discussions and solutions.

Why now? It's not a new trend. And seemingly even now it has not in fact been recognised, since the Chief Constable for the West Midlands denies that this trend exists.

It's very unlikely that the police were consciously acknowledging that communities were not communicating with them and just thought "bah, leave 'em to it!".

It's more likely they knew exactly what was going on and chose to permit it so as to avoid being painted as racists, as we already saw with the recent pedophile ring cases.

Of course, but there is still no evidence.

That may or may not be true. The BBC did not present any evidence, but the BBC is not the one making the claim. The Chief Inspector of Police likely has access to a great deal of evidence to reach his conclusions.
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by Observatory
Why now? It's not a true trend. And clearly it has not been recognised, since the Chief Constable for the West Midlands denies that this trend exists.


It has to be observed at some point. Problems don't just magically get solved without recognising them and formulating a plan. And that's exactly my point - it's early stages, there is disagreement throughout the force as this is a phenomenon that is just being recognised.

Original post by Observatory
It's more likely they knew exactly what was going on and chose to permit it so as to avoid being painted as racists, as we already saw with the recent pedophile ring cases.


I see no reason to believe why that's more likely but, regardless, reports are priorities and this is a difficult situation to manage, especially under budgetary pressure. Trying to twist this into an attack on the police is clearly wrong when Tom Winsor is openly stating his concerns in an attempt to resolve the problem. It's not as if this has been leaked - it is a direct statement from the chief inspector who clearly feels that the police are limited in what they can do.

Original post by Observatory
That may or may not be true. The BBC did not present any evidence, but the BBC is not the one making the claim.


Yes it is true:

"I hope that Mr Winsor will back up his statements in his report. The home affairs select committee will also ask Bob Jones, the police and crime commissioner for the West Midlands, about this matter when he gives evidence to us on Tuesday."
Original post by maskofsanity
It has to be observed at some point. Problems don't just magically get solved without recognising them and formulating a plan. And that's exactly my point - it's early stages, there is disagreement throughout the force as this is a phenomenon that is just being recognised.

You claim on the one hand that there is no evidence for this trend. You claim on the other to know that 1. it exists 2. when it started (apparently very recently). Please provide me with the evidence on which you base those claims, particularly the second.

I see no reason to believe why that's more likely but, regardless, reports are priorities and this is a difficult situation to manage, especially under budgetary pressure. Trying to twist this into an attack on the police is clearly wrong when Tom Winsor is openly stating his concerns in an attempt to resolve the problem. It's not as if this has been leaked - it is a direct statement from the chief inspector who clearly feels that the police are limited in what they can do.

Because the police do not generally regard vigilantism as a minor matter with a low priority. The relation to immigration is the distinguishing factor here. Furthermore immigration did not begin during the financial crisis.

Winsor did not state that the police could not tackle this problem he said that they did not. Winsor is already hated by the police for repeatedly stating awkward facts that the senior management of the police would rather keep private. I suspect that Chief Constable Sims is checking his pension provision as we type.

Yes it is true:

"I hope that Mr Winsor will back up his statements in his report. The home affairs select committee will also ask Bob Jones, the police and crime commissioner for the West Midlands, about this matter when he gives evidence to us on Tuesday."

None of which implies that there is no evidence for his claim. I would think the fact he is about to release a report suggests that he will have evidence for the claim in the report. It's of course possible that Winsor has gone round the bend and made this up on the spot, and we shall see, but I assign that a relatively low probability.
Original post by Observatory
You claim on the one hand that there is no evidence for this trend. You claim on the other to know that 1. it exists 2. when it started (apparently very recently). Please provide me with the evidence on which you base those claims, particularly the second.


I didn't claim that, I simply added as an off-hand note that half the article contradicts Tom Winsor's claims. You are digressing further and further from the original point and splitting unnecessary hairs to be honest but I will try and clarify. I have said that it's early stages because it is - the police are in disagreement and no report has been released - that is the definition of early stages.

Original post by Observatory
Winsor did not state that the police could not tackle this problem he said that they didi not. Winsor is already hated by the police for repeatedly stating awkward facts that the senior management of the police would rather keep private. I suspect that Chief Constable Sims is checking his pension provision as we type.


Yes he did, i.e. due to lack of information/communication: "It's almost a closed book because we can't go there so don't know."

Original post by Observatory
None of which implies that there is no evidence for his claim. I would think the fact he is about to release a report suggests that he will have evidence for the claim in the report. It's of course possible that Winsor has gone round the bend and made this up on the spot, and we shall see, but I assign that a relatively low probability.


I never said there isn't any possibility of evidence existing, I said none has been provided.
Reply 12
This is the kind of **** which allows sharia councils to thrive, so must be stopped.
Largely BS and scaremongering.

Where are the statistics on this "issue"?

I have no doubt some ghettoised communities may engage in this behaviour. However, this is not the approach by the majority of people.
Reply 14
Original post by Foo.mp3
Haha, in your dreams girlfriend..

Spoiler




Oh, so you're one of those types of girls. :rolleyes:
I am getting too old and jaded for games, i just want you. :tong:


Don't worry Rapunzel, i will rescue you from your tower. :perv:
Reply 15
Original post by Foo.mp3
The Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Tom Winsor, said some ethnic minority communities are turning their backs on the police and rarely, if ever, call them to deal with/investigate crimes, even those as serious as murder, sex crimes and pedophilia, instead dealing with them 'in their own way' (Guardian, 2014)

"There are cities in the Midlands where the police never go because they are never called. They never hear of any trouble because the community deals with that on its own ... They just have their own form of community justice" (Tom Winsor, 2014)

This is what people mean by 'state multiculturalism has failed' (Cameron, 2011). It's time (ivory tower) liberals woke up to what is going on in our towns and cities. The West is turning into The Wild West, even Mr. Winsor went as far as to compare the situation in some parts of the UK to Northern Ireland during 'the Troubles'


I bet they mean Spark Hill.

All I can say is the people there did a much better job of controlling the riots than the police did.
Original post by Foo.mp3
Based on what?

Do you seriously think the police would keep stats on neighbourhoods they elect to allow to 'police themselves'? :laugh:


Sorry but if the police do not even know the basic statistics on approximately how many murders or rapes are being committed then I have no reason to believe that such an issue is an extensive issue for immigrant communities.
It's extremely implausible that whole cities do not call the police. I assume he means particular districts. The language is very confusing and propagandistic, since we are presumably talking about areas of a few thousand people at most. It's reasonable to draw attention to it, but not with such inflammatory language.
Original post by Foo.mp3
Your logic, and extension, baffles me :dontknow: What is the basis for this comment?


It baffles me why you continue a conversation that finished months ago.

Maybe you are not getting any attention.

In any case, I don't care any longer. I am not going back through the thread to find out what was written.
Original post by Foo.mp3
I've been busy

From whom? :holmes:

Thank you for your riveting and telling contribution. You, sir, are the picture of maturity and refinement :top2:


Stop talking BS. You have made plenty of other posts in the past 5 months.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending