The racist - someone who does not accept liberal totalitarianism

The Stephen Lawrence case still goes on over two decade later and his mother is in the House of Lords.

But Charlene Downes who was murdered by immigrants is relatively unknown and her mother is not assisted in the same way.

One of Charlene's relatives spoke to a Police chief and asked why Steven Lawrence' mother was made a Peer but Charlene's mother is not even helped, he went on to suggest that its to do with race which clearly it is! The response was to call him a racist. So now a racist is someone who challenges affirmative actions, progressivism, liberal totalitarianism. The term racist for this is about as meaningful as calling someone a taco yet it's used shamelessly to try and usher people through the gate.

For those who have not followed, some background about why the Stephen Lawrence case is liberal totalitarianism:

GVc4Fp5PnAM

Reply 1

The_Duck

7

Well, you're going to last about a day.
In the case you aren't a massive troll, don't use phrases like liberal totalitarianism without knowing what either word means.

Reply 2

Green Marble

Racist is simply another term for white person. Didn't you know all white people are racist

Reply 3

thesabbath

2

Original post by The_Duck

Well, you're going to last about a day.
In the case you aren't a massive troll, don't use phrases like liberal totalitarianism without knowing what either word means.

One might use it to refer to those who hounded Dr Frank Ellis out of academia on account of his being a "racist". Hold the wrong views and the closed club of self-serving intelligentsia will kick you out. Liberal?

Reply 4

KingStannis

3

"liberal totalitarianism" -- just lol.

Are you a troll, an idiot, or an American?

Reply 5

thesabbath

2

Original post by KingStannis

"liberal totalitarianism" -- just lol.

Are you a troll, an idiot, or an American?

You may find this essay of interest:

"The foundation of Liberal Totalitarianism can be simply stated: the unchallenged assumption that liberalism is exempt from liberalism."

-- http://rulingclass.wordpress.com/2012/05/07/liberal-totalitarianism/

Reply 6

KingStannis

3

Original post by thesabbath

You may find this essay of interest:

"The foundation of Liberal Totalitarianism can be simply stated: the unchallenged assumption that liberalism is exempt from liberalism."

-- http://rulingclass.wordpress.com/2012/05/07/liberal-totalitarianism/

Thanks for this. It was an interesting read; although I admit much of it was beyond me.

I can now accept that this "liberal totalitarianism" could exist, as the author of that essay describes it to be. However, this was the initial point I was trying to make, and is echoed by the author:

"In the end, “Liberal Totalitarianism,” is not liberal."

Reply 7

yo radical one

6

There is no liberal totalitarianism

it's just White Supremacist morons like yourself who think you're the victim of some sort of conspiracy.

Stephen Lawrence gets a lot of attention not because he is Black and the evil elite want to destroy White people, but rather because after his racially motivated murder, the metropolitan police which is supposed to protect everybody, systemically failed to investigate the case properly. After this, undercover police tried to destroy the reputation of his family in an effort to quell the demands for a new investigation.

If you think this has anything to do with anti-White racism, you probably have a sub 70 IQ and spend your evenings parading around in piss-stained White sheets.

Reply 8

imtelling

4

The police messed up the Stephen Lawrence case.

The police messed up the Charlene Downes case.

The difference in how these two cases were treated proves that the Politically Correct power structure which dominates British society is anti-white in its outlook.

Reply 9

yo radical one

6

Original post by imtelling

The police messed up the Stephen Lawrence case.

The police messed up the Charlene Downes case.

The difference in how these two cases were treated proves that the Politically Correct power structure which dominates British society is anti-white in its outlook.

The circumstances are totally different

The failings in Charlene Downes' case were not a result of her being White and the police having an anti-White bias, further, the police did not try to damage the reputation of her family to cover themselves. They did try to reopen the case and find her killer(s).

How does this support the narrative you believe; they took a bunch of Asians to court and accused them of literally using her body as kebab meat (which if true would have been absolutely horrific) but there was no evidence. Were the Asian men taken to court because of anti-Asian biases? It's possible, if you think you are a victim, you really are very wrong indeed.

Reply 10

imtelling

4

Original post by yo radical one

The circumstances are totally different

The failings in Charlene Downes' case were not a result of her being White and the police having an anti-White bias, further, the police did not try to damage the reputation of her family to cover themselves. They did try to reopen the case and find her killer(s).

How does this support the narrative you believe; they took a bunch of Asians to court and accused them of literally using her body as kebab meat (which if true would have been absolutely horrific) but there was no evidence. Were the Asian men taken to court because of anti-Asian biases? It's possible, if you think you are a victim, you really are very wrong indeed.

The circumstances are exactly the same. The only difference was the reaction to the mistakes the police made.

There was no evidence that the police deliberately messed up the Stephen Lawrence case because of anti-black bias. Even the Macpherson report provided no evidence of deliberate police sabotage.

Regarding the Charlene Downes case, the police had audio confession from the racist murderers but because of technicalities it was inadmissible in court.

Two cases. Two police blunders. But a world apart in how the politically correct establishment went about correcting those mistakes.

The racist murderers of Charlene Downes got 6 figure pay off's because of police mistakes. The racist murderers of Stephen Lawrence got hounded for over 20 years by the establishment until they were brought to justice.

The Charlene Downes case is proof of the multi-tiered level of racism ordinary white working class people have to endure in this country.

Reply 11

yo radical one

6

Original post by imtelling

The circumstances are exactly the same. The only difference was the reaction to the mistakes the police made.

There was no evidence that the police deliberately messed up the Stephen Lawrence case because of anti-black bias. Even the Macpherson report provided no evidence of deliberate police sabotage.

Regarding the Charlene Downes case, the police had audio confession from the racist murderers but because of technicalities it was inadmissible in court.

Two cases. Two police blunders. But a world apart in how the politically correct establishment went about correcting those mistakes.

The racist murderers of Charlene Downes got 6 figure pay off's because of police mistakes. The racist murderers of Stephen Lawrence got hounded for over 20 years by the establishment until they were brought to justice.

The Charlene Downes case is proof of the multi-tiered level of racism ordinary white working class people have to endure in this country.

Er no

The transcripts were found to have been inaudible and the investigating officer admitted he might have written out the transcript wrong and there was a suggestion of a past history between him and the accused

The report did suggest that the Met was institutionally racist and condemned errors made

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/24/newsid_2518000/2518591.stm

So tell me, are you a liar or just stupid? :wink:

Reply 12

imtelling

4

Original post by yo radical one

Er no

The transcripts were found to have been inaudible and the investigating officer admitted he might have written out the transcript wrong and there was a suggestion of a past history between him and the accused

The report did suggest that the Met was institutionally racist and condemned errors made

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/24/newsid_2518000/2518591.stm

So tell me, are you a liar or just stupid? :wink:

The macpherson report found no evidence of deliberate sabotage. The mistakes the police made, unfortunately, were not uncommon. The false charge of 'institutional racism' was a blanket statement about the Met itself, and in no way related to the specific Lawrence case.

As for Charlene Downes case, its far more sinister than police incompetence. The police actually covered up the grooming and rape of underage white girls in the exact area where Charlene Downes went missing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Charlene_Downes

This, of course, was part of a country wide cover up which was thankfully exposed in 2012 by the times newspaper:

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article3547661.ece

You have to stop being so naive and start to see why the police and politically correct establishment deliberately covered up these events and why the murderers of Charlene Downes were given 6 figure pay offs despite the police having evidence against them.

If the police really, really wanted to they could hound the suspects, like the hounded the suspects in the Lawrence case, but they will not.

Reply 13

anarchism101

17

http://www.darkmatter101.org/site/2008/02/19/%E2%80%98liberal-multiculturalism-is-the-hegemony-%E2%80%93-its-an-empirical-fact%E2%80%99-a-response-to-slavoj-zizek/

"The hegemonic position is that liberal multiculturalism is the hegemony"

Reply 14

Three Mile Sprint

14

Original post by imtelling

The macpherson report found no evidence of deliberate sabotage. The mistakes the police made, unfortunately, were not uncommon. The false charge of 'institutional racism' was a blanket statement about the Met itself, and in no way related to the specific Lawrence case.

As for Charlene Downes case, its far more sinister than police incompetence. The police actually covered up the grooming and rape of underage white girls in the exact area where Charlene Downes went missing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Charlene_Downes

This, of course, was part of a country wide cover up which was thankfully exposed in 2012 by the times newspaper:

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article3547661.ece

You have to stop being so naive and start to see why the police and politically correct establishment deliberately covered up these events and why the murderers of Charlene Downes were given 6 figure pay offs despite the police having evidence against them.

If the police really, really wanted to they could hound the suspects, like the hounded the suspects in the Lawrence case, but they will not.

I applaud you for this post , beautifully made.

Reply 15

Green Marble

Original post by imtelling

The macpherson report found no evidence of deliberate sabotage. The mistakes the police made, unfortunately, were not uncommon. The false charge of 'institutional racism' was a blanket statement about the Met itself, and in no way related to the specific Lawrence case.

As for Charlene Downes case, its far more sinister than police incompetence. The police actually covered up the grooming and rape of underage white girls in the exact area where Charlene Downes went missing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Charlene_Downes

This, of course, was part of a country wide cover up which was thankfully exposed in 2012 by the times newspaper:

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article3547661.ece

You have to stop being so naive and start to see why the police and politically correct establishment deliberately covered up these events and why the murderers of Charlene Downes were given 6 figure pay offs despite the police having evidence against them.

If the police really, really wanted to they could hound the suspects, like the hounded the suspects in the Lawrence case, but they will not.

fantastic post

Reply 16

the_lost_boy

7

Original post by KingStannis

"liberal totalitarianism" -- just lol.

Are you a troll, an idiot, or an American?

Correction: *Republican American

Half of Americans aren't like this. The half that is Republican resides in the South, and the only reason they make up such a large portion of the population is because they also don't teach about contraception in sex education courses in those states. (I'm not even kidding, they only teach birth control via abstinence in the South. It's like Church and State were never separated.)

Reply 17

Green Marble

Original post by the_lost_boy

Correction: *Republican American

Half of Americans aren't like this. The half that is Republican resides in the South, and the only reason they make up such a large portion of the population is because they also don't teach about contraception in sex education courses in those states. (I'm not even kidding, they only teach birth control via abstinence in the South. It's like Church and State were never separated.)