please take this rape test! spread rape awareness!
Scroll to see replies
Darn it I got the last one wrong, I knew I should have stuck with the "what would a bat**** crazy feminist think" mentality!
Though it's sort of a backhanded compliment coming from the sort of feminist who would actually follow such a train of thought, because it says the man must have said things to trick her, so they admit the male can outsmart the female.
Though it's sort of a backhanded compliment coming from the sort of feminist who would actually follow such a train of thought, because it says the man must have said things to trick her, so they admit the male can outsmart the female.
Original post by Law-Hopeful
The 'forces herself' implied a lack of consent, so I thought it was.
Depends how you interpret it I guess.
Depends how you interpret it I guess.
By law, only a man can commit rape:
http://humanrights.ie/criminal-justice/the-law-of-rape-in-the-uk-and-ireland/
that's what I was going by on the quiz.
I personally see it as wrong, but I didn't think the quiz was asking for personal opinion?
Original post by Mutleybm1996
Oh dear, looks like SOMEONE wasn't sharp enough to realise it's a FAKE TEST! Oh well, it does take a pretty smart cookie to figure that out!
A woman is not capable of raping a man, and the man should know better.
Lolwut
Lolwut
Original post by ILovePancakes
By law, only a man can commit rape:
http://humanrights.ie/criminal-justice/the-law-of-rape-in-the-uk-and-ireland/
that's what I was going by on the quiz.
I personally see it as wrong, but I didn't think the quiz was asking for personal opinion?
http://humanrights.ie/criminal-justice/the-law-of-rape-in-the-uk-and-ireland/
that's what I was going by on the quiz.
I personally see it as wrong, but I didn't think the quiz was asking for personal opinion?
So if a woman spikes a man's drink and he becomes unconcious, then proceeds to tie him to a chair so he can't move and then feeds forcefully feeds him viagra and takes off his trousers and keep riding him.
It's not rape in the eyes of the law?
wtf
Original post by Law-Hopeful
Which one did you get 'right'?
Which one did you get 'right'?
The woman forcing herself onto a man isn't rape, as you need a penis to rape.
Original post by Jimothy rodgers
So if a woman spikes a man's drink and he becomes unconcious, then proceeds to tie him to a chair so he can't move and then feeds forcefully feeds him viagra and takes off his trousers and keep riding him.
It's not rape in the eyes of the law?
wtf
It's not rape in the eyes of the law?
wtf
I didn't write the law... but no.
I think that's a very extreme case though?
Read the article - it tells all
.Original post by ILovePancakes
By law, only a man can commit rape:
http://humanrights.ie/criminal-justice/the-law-of-rape-in-the-uk-and-ireland/
that's what I was going by on the quiz.
I personally see it as wrong, but I didn't think the quiz was asking for personal opinion?
http://humanrights.ie/criminal-justice/the-law-of-rape-in-the-uk-and-ireland/
that's what I was going by on the quiz.
I personally see it as wrong, but I didn't think the quiz was asking for personal opinion?
In the US I believe rape can be committed by a woman too.
But if you're taking the UK definition of rape then you're obviously correct.
Perhaps it is sexual assault or something of the like.
Original post by Law-Hopeful
In the US I believe rape can be committed by a woman too.
But if you're taking the UK definition of rape then you're obviously correct.
Perhaps it is sexual assault or something of the like.
But if you're taking the UK definition of rape then you're obviously correct.
Perhaps it is sexual assault or something of the like.
Is the US law just woman-minor?
I was just thinking of UK law
.It's classed under 'aggravated sexual assault'.
Original post by Law-Hopeful
The 'forces herself' implied a lack of consent, so I thought it was.
Depends how you interpret it I guess.
Depends how you interpret it I guess.
In law a woman can not rape a man, it's not about interpretation.
Original post by Chief Wiggum
The woman forcing herself onto a man isn't rape, as you need a penis to rape.
I see.
If a woman intentionally penetrated the anus of a man with an object (or vice versa) would this then be classed as 'assault by penetration'? Why is there a distinction made between this and the offence of rape?
Original post by wat a wizard
I scored 0/5
This website has to be troll made.
http://www.onlinequizcreator.com/rape-awareness/exam-3103
This website has to be troll made.
http://www.onlinequizcreator.com/rape-awareness/exam-3103
But everything on it is true?
Maybe a troll but just reminds me of trick questions and brain teasers when you are a kid (obvs not about rape though)
I got 4/4, it's based on uk law.
4/4 
Spoiler
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Law-Hopeful
I see.
If a woman intentionally penetrated the anus of a man with an object (or vice versa) would this then be classed as 'assault by penetration'? Why is there a distinction made between this and the offence of rape?
If a woman intentionally penetrated the anus of a man with an object (or vice versa) would this then be classed as 'assault by penetration'? Why is there a distinction made between this and the offence of rape?
I have no idea, I'm afraid. I'm no lawyer - I hope that post of mine that you quoted was accurate, I think it is.
"1-(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life."
Original post by ILovePancakes
I didn't write the law... but no.
I think that's a very extreme case though?
Read the article - it tells all.
I think that's a very extreme case though?
Read the article - it tells all
.Brb moving to Russia
Original post by Georgie_M
But everything on it is true?
Maybe a troll but just reminds me of trick questions and brain teasers when you are a kid (obvs not about rape though)
I got 4/4, it's based on uk law.
Maybe a troll but just reminds me of trick questions and brain teasers when you are a kid (obvs not about rape though)
I got 4/4, it's based on uk law.
lol, there is absolutely no way that answering according to UK law gives you 4/4 on that test. You can still consent to sex when you're drunk.
Original post by Jimothy rodgers
Brb moving to Russia
Don't kill too many Ukrainians.
Original post by Chief Wiggum
I have no idea, I'm afraid. I'm no lawyer - I hope that post of mine that you quoted was accurate, I think it is.
"1-(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life."
"1-(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life."
That's from S.1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, s.2 is the part I was referring to. S.1 means that a woman can't commit rape (as you stated), but s.2 appears to show that women can commit 'assault by penetration'.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- Is it alright if my boyfriend slaps me?
- Prime - law work experience!!!
- Does Warwick still have a rape culture?
- Students accused of rape at university bringing lawyers to hearings
- Master's Dissertation Participants
- Why do some soldiers rape?
- Unconscious bias - is it time to rethink how we address VAWG?
- Participants needed!!
- Capital Punishment Survey
- Compelling personal reasona
- I've found St Andrews to be a racist university
- can someone give feedback on my eng lit essay?
- can someone give me feedback and help on my eng lit essay? (A level)
- Atonement question about concealment
- Bad dreams in Islam during ramadhan 2024
- BMAT or UCAS
- Participants needed
- Examples of unjust laws in the UK
- Girls boxing, your views
- DBS check
Latest
Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
If you could instantly become fluent in any foreign language which one would it be?Last reply 3 months ago
About the NCUK IFY Program for university Studies in the UKTrending
Last reply 3 days ago
If you could instantly become fluent in any foreign language which one would it be?Last reply 3 months ago
About the NCUK IFY Program for university Studies in the UK
